Conditioning and Intervening

Christopher Meek,C. Glymour

Published 1994 in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

ABSTRACT

We consider the dispute between causal decision theorists and evidential decision theorists over Newcomb-like problems. We introduce a framework relating causation and directed graphs developed by Spirtes et al. (1993) and evaluate several arguments in this context. We argue that much of the debate between the two camps is misplaced; the disputes turn on the distinction between conditioning on an event E as against conditioning on an event I which is an action to bring about E. We give the essential machinery for calculating the effect of an intervention and consider recent work which extends the basic account given here to the case where causal Knowledge is incomplete.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    1994

  • Venue

    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

  • Publication date

    1994-12-01

  • Fields of study

    Sociology, Philosophy

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-29 of 29 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-100 of 145 citing papers · Page 1 of 2