Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1980

• Venue

  British heart journal

• Publication date

  1980-03-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1136/hrt.43.3.284PMID 7437175PMCID PMC482277
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

  1978cited by this paper
• Diagnosis of valvular heart disease using transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound.

  1977cited by this paper
• Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with a non-invasive ultrasound Doppler technique.

  1976cited by this paper
• Assessing the Severity of Aortic Stenosis by Phonocardiography and External Carotid Pulse Recordings

  1973cited by this paper
• Assessment of site and severity in congenital aortic stenosis.

  1967cited by this paper
• Accuracy of the Phonocardiogram in Assessing Severity of Aortic and Pulmonic Stenosis

  1964cited by this paper

• Invasive Versus Echocardiographic Transvalvular Pressure Gradients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort

  2026cites this paper
• From Gorlin and Doppler Equations to Deep Learning: Is Aortic Stenosis Quantification on the Brink of a New Era?

  2026cites this paper
• Hemodynamics and Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Valve-in-Valve TAVR With Balloon-Expandable Valves.

  2026cites this paper
• Normal reference values of three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived aortic valve annular dimensions in healthy adults—a detailed analysis from the MAGYAR-Healthy Study

  2025cites this paper
• Understanding the Transvalvular Gradient in Aortic Stenosis: A Multifaceted Perspective

  2025cites this paper
• Ophthalmic artery flow reversal and pressure reducing carotid stenosis

  2025cites this paper
• Relevance of using the right parasternal projection in ultrasound assessing the severity of aortic stenosis. Results of a single-center prospective study

  2025cites this paper
• The Dimensions of the Aortic Valve Annulus Are Not Associated with Systolic Excursion of Its Plane in the Same Healthy Adults: Detailed Insights from the Three-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiographic MAGYAR-Healthy Study

  2025cites this paper
• My Approach to Estimate Pulmonary Pressures: Practical Aspects

  2025cites this paper
• Management of aortic stenosis and chronic heart failure: A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC

  2025cites this paper
• Left ventricle function and post-transcriptional events with exercise training in pigs

  2024cites this paper
• Prognostication and Interventional Guidance Using Acceleration-Ejection Time Ratio in Undifferentiated Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

  2024cites this paper
• Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment Is Mandatory to Confirm Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction and Failure Following TAVR

  2024cites this paper
• Diagnostic Contexts of Echocardiographic Nonapical Window

  2024cites this paper
• Predominant determinants for evaluation of right parasternal approach in transthoracic echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a study based on three-dimensional cardiac computed tomography analysis

  2024cites this paper
• Echocardiography: Past, Present, and Future.

  2024cites this paper
• Energy-loss index does not improve risk prediction in aortic stenosis compared to conventional aortic valve area assessment

  2023cites this paper
• Is There Still a Role for Invasive Assessment of Aortic Gradient?

  2023cites this paper
• Echocardiographic Versus Invasive Aortic Valve Gradients In Different Clinical Scenarios.

  2023cites this paper
• Comparison of Echocardiographic and Catheter Mean Gradient to Assess Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

  2023cites this paper
• Assessment of pulmonary artery stiffness by multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance-surrogate for right heart catheterization

  2023cites this paper
• Reduced order modelling for direct and inverse problems in haemodynamics

  2023cites this paper
• Utilization of Engineering Advances for Detailed Biomechanical Characterization of the Mitral–Ventricular Relationship to Optimize Repair Strategies: A Comprehensive Review

  2023cites this paper
• 4Dflow‐VP‐Net: A deep convolutional neural network for noninvasive estimation of relative pressures in stenotic flows from 4D flow MRI

  2023influential citation
• Perioperative and Anesthetic Considerations in Pediatric Valvar and Subvalvar Aortic Stenosis

  2023cites this paper
• Diagnostic capabilities of echocardiographic indicators of acceleration time and the ratio of acceleration time to total left ventricular ejection time in the assessment of severe aortic stenosis in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

  2023cites this paper
• Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Hemodynamics: Definitions, Outcomes, and Evidence Gaps: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

  2022cites this paper
• A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance

  2022cites this paper
• Additive value of the right parasternal view for the assessment of aortic stenosis

  2022cites this paper
• Transvalvular Pressure Gradients and All-Cause Mortality Following TAVR: A Multicenter Echocardiographic and Invasive Registry.

  2022cites this paper
• A concise history of echocardiography: timeline, pioneers, and landmark publications

  2022cites this paper
• Comparative analysis of echocardiographic indicators of acceleration time and the ratio of acceleration time to total left ventricular ejection time with catheterization indicators in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with Normal flow High Gradient

  2022cites this paper
• Contemporary advances in medical imaging

  2021cites this paper
• MEDICAL PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL

  2021influential citation
• Pressure Recovery Phenomenon in Aortic Stenosis. An Inconvenient Truth?

  2021cites this paper
• Comparison of stenosis models for usage in the estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation

  2021cites this paper
• Acceleration Time in Aortic Stenosis: A New Life for an Old Parameter.

  2021cites this paper
• Pressure Difference Estimation in Non-stenotic Carotid Bifurcation Phantoms Using Vector Flow Imaging.

  2021cites this paper
• Evaluation of aortic stenosis: from Bernoulli and Doppler to Navier-Stokes

  2021cites this paper
• Relationship Between the Ratio of Acceleration Time/Ejection Time and Mortality in Patients With High‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis

  2021cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: The Present and Future of Aortic Stenosis Assessment, Prognostication and Management.

  2021cites this paper
• Echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography

  2021cites this paper
• Hemodynamic Modeling of Biological Aortic Valve Replacement Using Preoperative Data Only

  2021cites this paper
• Echocardiography for Congenital Heart Disease: Fundamental Approach

  2020cites this paper
• New Model for Non-Invasive Echocardiographic Assessment of Pulmonary-Capillary Wedge Pressure in Patients With Aortic and Mitral Regurgitation

  2020cites this paper
• Progression of aortic stenosis and echocardiographic criteria for its severity.

  2020cites this paper
• Assessing the true severity of low-gradient aortic stenosis using resting echocardiography.

  2020cites this paper
• EFSUMB History of Ultrasound

  2020cites this paper
• Effects of Heart Rate on the Pulsatile Flow Characteristics of a Stenotic Aortic Valve Model: An In Vitro Experimental Study

  2020cites this paper
• Flow Complexity Estimation in Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Dialysis Fistulas using Vector Flow Imaging.

  2020cites this paper
• Reconstructing haemodynamics quantities of interest from Doppler ultrasound imaging

  2020cites this paper
• Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states

  2019cites this paper
• Pressure Difference Estimation in Carotid Bulbs using Vector Flow Imaging - A Phantom Study

  2019cites this paper
• The Role of Imaging in Measuring Disease Progression and Assessing Novel Therapies in Aortic Stenosis

  2019influential citation
• Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis

  2019cites this paper
• Patient-specific non-invasive estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation using magnetic resonance imaging.

  2019cites this paper
• Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity

  2019cites this paper
• Impact of left ventricular outflow tract flow acceleration on aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis

  2019cites this paper
• Echocardiography - State of the Art in 2019: Contemporary Imaging of Aortic Stenosis.

  2019cites this paper
• Prognostic Impact of the Ratio of Acceleration Time to Ejection Time in Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

  2019cites this paper
• 3 Anaesthetic Considerations for Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis

  2018cites this paper
• Osteocardiology: The Go/No Go Theory for Clinical Trials

  2018cites this paper
• Towards Personalized Models of the Cardiovascular System Using 4 D Flow MRI

  2018cites this paper
• The Integration of Doppler Ultrasound With Two-Dimensional Echocardiography and the Noninvasive Cardiac Hemodynamic Revolution of the 1980s.

  2018cites this paper
• Evaluation of Hemodynamic Behavior of a Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis under Stress by Exercise Echocardiography

  2018cites this paper
• Non-Invasive Assessment of Intravascular Pressure Gradients: A Review of Current and Proposed Novel Methods

  2018cites this paper
• Assessment of Reynolds stress components and turbulent pressure loss using 4D flow MRI with extended motion encoding

  2018cites this paper
• Osteocardiology: Defining the Go/No-Go Time Point for Therapy

  2018cites this paper
• Clinical Implementation of Continuous‐Wave Doppler: It Made All the Difference

  2018cites this paper
• University of New Mexico School of Medicine & Veterans Hospital

  2017cites this paper
• Determination of pressure data from velocity data with a view towards its application in cardiovascular mechanics. Part 2: A study of aortic valve stenosis

  2017cites this paper
• The History of Ultrasound and Its Use at Point of Care: Neonatal Ultrasound in Transport

  2017cites this paper
• Feasibility and relevance of right parasternal view for assessing severity and rate of progression of aortic valve stenosis in primary care.

  2017cites this paper
• Acceleration Time and Ratio of Acceleration Time to Ejection Time in Aortic Stenosis: New Echocardiographic Diagnostic Parameters

  2017cites this paper
• Patient-Specific Left Ventricular Flow Simulations From Transthoracic Echocardiography: Robustness Evaluation and Validation Against Ultrasound Doppler and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  2017cites this paper
• Evolving new concepts in the assessment of aortic stenosis

  2017cites this paper
• Noninvasive Estimation of the Severity of Aortic Stenosis: Going Beyond Bernoulli.

  2017cites this paper
• The History of Ultrasound and Its Use at Point of Care: Neonatal Ultrasound in Transport

  2017cites this paper
• Risk of Pregnancy in Moderate and Severe Aortic Stenosis: From the Multinational ROPAC Registry.

  2016cites this paper
• [A history of the clinical research in cardiology].

  2016cites this paper
• HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF DOBUTAMINE IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION SECONDARY TO MITRAL STENOSIS - A DOPPLER ECHO STUDY

  2016cites this paper
• Methodological inaccuracies in clinical aortic valve severity assessment: insights from computational fluid dynamic modeling of CT-derived aortic valve anatomy

  2016cites this paper
• Une histoire de la recherche clinique en cardiologie

  2016cites this paper
• METHODS Determination of Aortic Valve Area by Two-Dimensional and Doppoler Echocardiography in Patients With Normal and Stenotic Valves

  2016cites this paper
• On the accuracy of viscous and turbulent loss quantification in stenotic aortic flow using phase‐contrast MRI

  2016cites this paper
• Advances in cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity and turbulence quantification

  2016cites this paper
• SEMINAR ON IN VITRO STUDIES OF CARDIAC FLOW AND THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-V”

  2016cites this paper
• 4D Flow MRI‐based pressure loss estimation in stenotic flows: Evaluation using numerical simulations

  2016cites this paper
• Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging measured Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in asymptomatic patients with Aortic Stenosis: a comparison with Exercise Testing

  2016influential citation
• Identification of Factors that Predict whether the Right Parasternal View Is Required for Accurate Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis Severity

  2016influential citation
• all Stress Modulates Brain Natriuretic Peptide roduction in Pressure Overload Cardiomyopathy arc

  2016cites this paper
• Estenosis aórtica grave sintomática: ¿qué es grave, qué es sintomática y qué dicen las guías de práctica clínica sobre su manejo?

  2015cites this paper
• Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis

  2015cites this paper
• Évolution échocardiographique et prédicteurs de progression de la sténose valvulaire aortique

  2015cites this paper
• Pressure Recovery in Congenital Aortic Stenosis.

  2015cites this paper
• Analysis of Specified Bernoulli Constant for Semilunar Valve Stenosis in Humans.

  2015cites this paper
• The Clinical Assessment of Intraventricular Flows

  2015cites this paper
• Methodological inaccuracies in clinical aortic valve severity assessment: insights from computational fluid dynamic modeling of CT-derived aortic valve anatomy

  2015cites this paper
• Semi-automation of Doppler Spectrum Image Analysis for Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity

  2015cites this paper
• Detection by Non invasive Methods

  2015cites this paper