Effects of Mental Health and Neuroscience Evidence on Juror Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant: the Moderating Role of Political Orientation.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Behavioral sciences & the law

• Publication date

  2016-09-13

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Political Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/bsl.2251PMID 27620269
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Effects of Mental Health and Neuroscience Evidence on Juror Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant: the Moderating Role of Political Orientation.

  2016cited by this paper
• Juror perceptions of the interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict sentence severity in a white-collar criminal case

  2016cited by this paper
• Jurors report that risk measure scores matter in sexually violent predator trials, but that other factors matter more.

  2015cited by this paper
• The impact of DSM-5's alternative model for personality disorders on criminal defendants.

  2014cited by this paper
• The Impact of Neuroimages in the Sentencing Phase of Capital Trials

  2014cited by this paper
• Investigating the Role of the Psychopathy Checklist–revised in United States Case Law

  2014cited by this paper
• What Are the Best Predictors of Opinions of Mental Illness in the Indian Population?

  2014cited by this paper
• On the (non)persuasive power of a brain image

  2013cited by this paper
• Neuroimages in court: less biasing than feared.

  2013cited by this paper
• The Seductive Allure of “Seductive Allure”

  2013cited by this paper
• Look Again: Effects of Brain Images and Mind–Brain Dualism on Lay Evaluations of Research

  2013cited by this paper
• Jury panel member perceptions of interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict support for execution in a capital murder trial simulation.

  2013cited by this paper
• Visual Attention and the Neuroimage Bias

  2013cited by this paper
• Bold, smart, dangerous and evil: perceived correlates of core psychopathic traits among jury panel members.

  2013cited by this paper
• No sympathy for the devil: attributing psychopathic traits to capital murderers also predicts support for executing them.

  2013cited by this paper
• Persuasive images in popular science: Testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility

  2012cited by this paper
• The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges' Sentencing of Psychopaths?

  2012cited by this paper
• Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.

  2012cited by this paper
• The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.

  2011cited by this paper
• Neuroimages as Evidence in a Mens Rea Defense: No Impact

  2011cited by this paper
• The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.

  2010cited by this paper
• Jurors' discussions of a defendant's history of child abuse and alcohol abuse in capital sentencing deliberations

  2010cited by this paper
• Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.

  2010cited by this paper
• Through a glass darkly: functional neuroimaging evidence enters the courtroom.

  2009cited by this paper
• Law & Psychiatry: Through a Glass Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging Evidence Enters the Courtroom

  2009cited by this paper
• Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.

  2009cited by this paper
• Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning

  2008cited by this paper
• The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses.

  2008cited by this paper
• Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: how do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors?

  2008cited by this paper
• The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations

  2008cited by this paper
• Five Factor Model Personality Traits, Jury Selection, and Case Outcomes in Criminal and Civil Cases

  2007cited by this paper
• A Double-Edged Sword: The Role of Neuroimaging in Federal Capital Sentencing

  2007cited by this paper
• Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Neuroimaging in the Courtroom

  2007cited by this paper
• Diagnostic Labeling in Juvenile Court: How Do Descriptions of Psychopathy and Conduct Disorder Influence Judges?

  2007cited by this paper
• Differential Impact of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Case Sentencing

  2007cited by this paper
• Gender differences in attitudes toward psychopathic sexual offenders.

  2006cited by this paper
• Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI

  2006cited by this paper
• NGRI Revisited: Venirepersons' Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense.

  2006cited by this paper
• Neuroscience and legal determination of criminal responsibility

  2006cited by this paper
• The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death?

  2005cited by this paper
• Psychopathic traits predict attitudes toward a juvenile capital murderer.

  2003cited by this paper
• The impact of contact on stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness

  2003cited by this paper
• The Case for Jury Sentencing

  2003cited by this paper
• Diagnostic test usage by forensic psychologists in emotional injury cases.

  1999cited by this paper
• The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out?

  1999cited by this paper
• Objective Brains, Prejudicial Images

  1999cited by this paper
• The Capital Jury and Absolution: The Intersection of Trial Strategy, Remorse and the Death Penalty

  1998cited by this paper
• An Attributional Analysis of Punishment Goals and Public Reactions to O. J. Simpson

  1997cited by this paper
• Forensic Psychological Expertise in the Wake of Daubert

  1997cited by this paper
• Neighborhood types and community reaction to the mentally ill: a paradox of intensity.

  1980cited by this paper

• Impact of Offender Schizophrenia Diagnosis on Public Perceptions of Crime and Punishment.

  2026cites this paper
• Exploring structural stigma towards mental disorders: An analysis of trial verdicts.

  2025cites this paper
• A mixed-methods analysis of the influence of bio-behavioral scientific evidence on U.S. judges' reasoning and sentencing decision-making.

  2025cites this paper
• The effect of psychopathy trait descriptions on mock juror decision-making

  2025cites this paper
• Judging the unseen: The impact of onset controllability in shaping perceptions of defendants with traumatic brain injury

  2025cites this paper
• Public Estimations and Attitudes Towards the Insanity Plea in the United States: A Replication of Seminal Studies From the 1980's.

  2025cites this paper
• Machine learning analysis of a national sample of U.S. case law involving mental health evidence

  2024cites this paper
• Issues Behind the Measurement of Political Orientation

  2024cites this paper
• Mock jurors’ conservative ideology and punitiveness: the role of criminal justice orientations

  2024cites this paper
• Mental health in the courtroom: how victim mental health status impacts juror decision-making in a rape case

  2024cites this paper
• Neuroscience explanations really do satisfy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seductive allure of neuroscience

  2023cites this paper
• Opening the Black Box of Judicial Decision-Making in Cases with Forensic Mental Health Reports: A Qualitative Study from the Netherlands

  2023cites this paper
• Brain science in American courts: the culpable neurotransmitters

  2023cites this paper
• The effect of neuroscientific evidence on sentencing depends on how one conceives of reasons for incarceration

  2022cites this paper
• Psychopathy evidence in legal proceedings

  2022cites this paper
• COVID-19 in the Courtroom: The Role of Mask Mandates and Source of Exposure on Negligence and Recklessness Decisions

  2022cites this paper
• The effects of forensic mental health reports on decisions about guilt in the Netherlands: An experimental approach.

  2021cites this paper
• Het effect van een pro Justitia-rapportage op de bewijsbeslissing: een empirische verkenning

  2020cites this paper
• Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review

  2020cites this paper
• Perceptions of Mental Health Conditions in Criminal Cases: A Survey Study Involving Swedish Lay Judges

  2020cites this paper
• The potential effect of neurobiological evidence on the adjudication of criminal responsibility of psychopathic defendants in involuntary manslaughter cases

  2020cites this paper
• Does Psychopathy Influence Juror Decision-Making in Capital Murder Trials? “The Devil is in the (Methodological) Details”

  2020cites this paper
• Biological Evidence Regarding Psychopathy Does Not Affect Mock Jury Sentencing.

  2019cites this paper
• Dangerous, depraved, and death-worthy: A meta-analysis of the correlates of perceived psychopathy in jury simulation studies.

  2019cites this paper
• Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review

  2019cites this paper
• Evaluating the Impact of Clinical Evidence about FASD on Attributions and Decisions in a Criminal Justice Context

  2019influential citation
• 08 / 23 / 2019 04 : 35 : 07 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PINELLAS COUNTY , FLORIDA 15-00226-CF SECTION I STATE OF FLORIDA Vs .

  2019cites this paper
• Effects of genetic and environmental explanations of psychopathy and gender on perceptions of criminal behaviors

  2019cites this paper
• Neuroscientific, Neuropsychological, and Psychological Evidence Comparably Impact Legal Decision Making: Implications for Experts and Legal Practitioners

  2018cites this paper
• The influence of risk assessment evidence on judicial sentencing decisions

  2018cites this paper
• Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant

  2018cites this paper
• Neurolaw today - A systematic review of the recent law and neuroscience literature.

  2018cites this paper
• The Use of Neuroscience for Mitigation During Sentencing in Non-Capital Cases

  2017cites this paper
• Triarchic Model Personality Traits and Their Impact on Mock Juror Perceptions of a White-Collar Criminal Defendant

  2017cites this paper
• Effects of Mental Health and Neuroscience Evidence on Juror Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant: the Moderating Role of Political Orientation.

  2016cites this paper