CAN HYPOTHETICAL, QUESTIONS PREDICT ACTUAL, PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROGRAMS? A FIELD VALIDITY TEST USING A PROVISION POINT MECHANISM

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1997

• Venue

  Research Papers in Economics

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Economics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Voluntary revelation of the demand for public goods using a provision point mechanism

  1999cited by this paper
• Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method

  1999cited by this paper
• Green power marketing: increasing customer demand for renewable energy

  1998cited by this paper
• Alternative Rebate Rules in the Provision of a Threshold Public Good: An Experimental Investigation

  1998cited by this paper
• Embedding and calibration in measuring non-use values

  1998cited by this paper
• Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods

  1997cited by this paper
• A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs

  1997cited by this paper
• The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction

  1997cited by this paper
• Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good

  1996cited by this paper
• Willingness to pay for electricity from renewable energy

  1996influential reference
• Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?

  1995cited by this paper
• Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent

  1995cited by this paper
• How precise are monetary representations of environmental improvements

  1995cited by this paper
• Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.

  1994cited by this paper
• Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research

  1994cited by this paper
• Report of the NOOA Panel on Contingent Valuation

  1993cited by this paper
• Provision of step‐level public goods with continuous contribution

  1992cited by this paper
• Provision of Step-Level Public Goods

  1990cited by this paper
• Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment

  1990cited by this paper
• Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications, Rebecca L. Johnson and Gary V. Johnson, eds. 1990. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 240 pages. ISBN: 0-8133-7838-9. $32.50

  1990cited by this paper
• The assurance problem in a laboratory market

  1989cited by this paper
• Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method

  1989cited by this paper
• Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study

  1987cited by this paper
• Organizing Groups for Collective Action

  1986cited by this paper
• Public goods provision in an experimental environment

  1985cited by this paper
• Experimental Tests of an Allocation Mechanism for Private, Public or Externality Goods*

  1984cited by this paper
• Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses

  1984cited by this paper
• Behavioral explanations of efficient public good allocations

  1982influential reference
• Economists free ride, does anyone else? : Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV

  1981cited by this paper
• Experiments with a Decentralized Mechanism for Public Good Decisions

  1980cited by this paper
• Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method

  1979cited by this paper
• Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?

  1979cited by this paper
• An Experimental Comparison of Three Public GOod Decision Mechanisms

  1979cited by this paper
• Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the 'Free Rider Problem'

  1977cited by this paper
• The Pure Theory of Public Expanditure

  1954cited by this paper

• Economic valuation of environmental and health impacts from mining: the case of Peru

  2022cites this paper
• The sample median as an estimator of population mean true willingness to pay under valuation uncertainty: a synthesis and analysis of the literature

  2022cites this paper
• Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field

  2007cites this paper
• The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values : Evidence from a field study

  2005cites this paper
• Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?

  2002cites this paper
• The private provision of public goods: tests of a provision point mechanism for funding green power programs

  2002cites this paper
• Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles

  2002cites this paper
• Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias

  2001cites this paper
• Forecasting the Growth of Green Power Markets in the United States

  2001cites this paper
• ALTERNATIVE CALIBRATION AND AUCTION INSTITUTIONS FOR PREDICTING CONSUMER WILLINGESS TO PAY FOR NONGENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN CHIPS

  2001cites this paper
• Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards

  2001cites this paper
• Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method

  1999cites this paper
• Green power marketing: increasing customer demand for renewable energy

  1998cites this paper
• ESTIMATES OF INDIVIDUAL DAIRY FARM SUPPLY ELASTICITIES

  1998cites this paper
• A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs

  1997cites this paper
• An Exploration of the Differences in National Growth: Some Implications for Future Environmental Policy

  1997cites this paper