A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1997

• Venue

  Land Economics

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Economics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.2307/3147257
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Voluntary revelation of the demand for public goods using a provision point mechanism

  1999cited by this paper
• Mail versus Telephone Surveys: Potential Biases in Expenditure and Willingness-to-Pay Data

  1998influential reference
• Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods

  1997cited by this paper
• Real And Hypothetical Willingness To Pay For Environmental Preservation: A Non‐Experimental Comparison

  1997cited by this paper
• CAN HYPOTHETICAL, QUESTIONS PREDICT ACTUAL, PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROGRAMS? A FIELD VALIDITY TEST USING A PROVISION POINT MECHANISM

  1997cited by this paper
• The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources

  1996cited by this paper
• Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good

  1996cited by this paper
• Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context

  1996cited by this paper
• DEVELOPING A DEMAND REVEALING MARKET CRITERION FOR CONTINGENT VALUATION VALIDITY TESTS

  1996cited by this paper
• Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?

  1995cited by this paper
• Effect of social desirability bias and memory recall on reported contributions to a wildlife income tax checkoff program

  1994cited by this paper
• Comparison of Mail and Telephone-Mail Contingent Valuation Surveys

  1994cited by this paper
• Report of the NOOA Panel on Contingent Valuation

  1993cited by this paper
• Sample Non-response Bias and Aggregate Benefits in Contingent Valuation: an Examination of Early, Late and Non-respondents

  1993cited by this paper
• Evaluation of Mail and In-person Contingent Value Surveys: Results of a Study of Recreational Boaters

  1991cited by this paper
• The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys

  1991cited by this paper
• Voluntary Contribution Games: Efficient Private Provision of Public Goods

  1991cited by this paper
• Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment

  1990cited by this paper
• Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method

  1989cited by this paper
• Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques

  1988cited by this paper
• A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation

  1987cited by this paper
• Overlooked Biases in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Some Considerations

  1987cited by this paper
• USING DUAL FRAME DESIGNS TO REDUCE NONRESPONSE IN TELEPHONE SURVEYS

  1987cited by this paper
• A comparison of response effects in self-administered and telephone surveys

  1987cited by this paper
• RESEARCH ON SURVEY DATA QUALITY

  1987influential reference
• Expanding Contingent Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed Solutions

  1987cited by this paper
• The Consequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures

  1981cited by this paper
• Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method

  1979influential reference

• Driving desire: Exploring willingness to pay for a higher social status in automobiles

  2025cites this paper
• Reducing the Hypothetical Bias in Measuring Willingness to Pay for Mobile Communication Products

  2025cites this paper
• Assessment of willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year in the post COVID-19 pandemic era in Japan.

  2025cites this paper
• Americans' willingness to give to global immunization programs: Political heterogeneity in preferences for program management and response to priming communications.

  2024cites this paper
• Monetary value of health—a practical decision-making framework combining equity considerations and WTP

  2024cites this paper
• Renewable energy prosocial behavior, is it source dependent?

  2024cites this paper
• Mexican consumers' attitudes toward irradiated and imported apples

  2024cites this paper
• Experience in Engineering Complex Systems: Active Preference Learning With Multiple Outcomes and Certainty Levels

  2023cites this paper
• Informing decision makers about public preferences for different modalities of cancer treatment in the Rhône–Alps region in France

  2023cites this paper
• Perception towards time of use (TOU) electricity pricing amongst residential consumers in Maharashtra

  2023cites this paper
• Journalistien painostus ja uhkailu Suomessa: yleisyys ja vaikutukset

  2022cites this paper
• Body Image Distress and Its Associations From an International Sample of Men and Women Across the Adult Life Span: Web-Based Survey Study

  2021cites this paper
• Comparing Internet and phone survey mode effects across countries and research contexts*

  2021cites this paper
• Willingness to Pay to Improve Quality of Public Healthcare Services in Mauritius

  2021cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods

  2021cites this paper
• Can immersive virtual reality increase respondents’ certainty in discrete choice experiments? A comparison with traditional presentation formats

  2021cites this paper
• Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression

  2021cites this paper
• Examining Willingness-to-Pay and Zero Valuations for a Health Improvement with Logistic Regression

  2021cites this paper
• Public preference for the ecological restoration of coastal wetlands in Jiaozhou Bay in China based on a choice experiment

  2021cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods

  2021cites this paper
• A systematic review and meta-regression of studies eliciting willingness-to-pay per quality-adjusted life year in the general population

  2021cites this paper
• Consequentiality, Elicitation Formats, and the Willingness to Pay for Green Electricity: Evidence from Germany

  2021cites this paper
• Choice experiments in non-market value analysis: some methodological issues

  2020cites this paper
• The impact of gender, age, and engagement on survey response timing: 10 years of data collection from UK hunters

  2020cites this paper
• Consequentiality and Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Method: An Experimental Investigation

  2020cites this paper
• Willingness to Pay for Mandibular Overdentures: A Societal Perspective

  2020cites this paper
• Body Image Distress and Its Associations From an International Sample of Men and Women Across the Adult Life Span: Web-Based Survey Study (Preprint)

  2020cites this paper
• Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual Hypothetical Bias: A meta-analysis

  2019cites this paper
• Mitigating hypothetical bias in willingness to pay studies: post-estimation uncertainty and anchoring on irrelevant information

  2019cites this paper
• Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis

  2018influential citation
• Equity and the willingness to pay for green electricity in Germany

  2018cites this paper
• Does positive framing matter? An investigation of how framing affects consumers’ willingness to buy green electricity in Denmark

  2018cites this paper
• Méta-analyse du biais hypothétique dans l'évaluation des consentements à payer et répartition des marges dans la filière des oeufs

  2018cites this paper
• Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments

  2018cites this paper
• Chasing the thrill or just passing the time? Trialing a new mixed methods approach to understanding heterogeneity amongst recreational fishers based on motivations

  2018cites this paper
• WILLINGNESS TO RENT PUBLIC LAND FOR ROTATIONAL GRAZING: THE IMPORTANCE OF RESPONSE BEHAVIOR

  2018cites this paper
• Economic valuation of groundwater protection using a groundwater quality ladder based on chemical threshold levels

  2018cites this paper
• Green Electricity Markets as Mechanisms of Public-Goods Provision: Theory and Experimental Evidence

  2018cites this paper
• Ceny produktów ekologicznych a zachowania konsumentów

  2018cites this paper
• Comparison of Self-Reported Telephone Interviewing and Web-Based Survey Responses: Findings From the Second Australian Young and Well National Survey

  2017cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias: a new meta-analysis

  2017cites this paper
• Re-examining empirical evidence on stated preferences: importance of incentive compatibility

  2017cites this paper
• Green Electricity Markets as Mechanisms of Public-Goods Provision: Theory and Experimental Evidence

  2017cites this paper
• Green Energy Branding

  2017cites this paper
• Improving choice model parameter estimates by jointly modelling the SP choices with corresponding elicited certainty ratings

  2017cites this paper
• Homeowner willingness to pay for rooftop solar electricity generation

  2017cites this paper
• Consumer preferences for fair labour certification

  2017cites this paper
• Are you willing to pay more for the arts

  2017cites this paper
• Are American households willing to pay a premium for greening consumption of Information and Communication Technologies

  2016cites this paper
• Willingness to pay towards a public good: how does a refund option affect stated values?

  2016cites this paper
• Consumer Preference for Sustainable Attributes in Plants: Evidence from Experimental Auctions

  2016cites this paper
• Third-Party Certification, Sponsorship, and Consumers’ Ecolabel Use

  2016cites this paper
• Willingness to pay and the sensitivity of willingness to pay for interdisciplinary musculoskeletal clinics: a contingent valuation study in Quebec, Canada

  2016influential citation
• Consumer Demand for Green Electricity: A Study of Consumer Switching in New Zealand Retail Electricity Markets

  2016cites this paper
• Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error

  2016cites this paper
• 1 Payment for Ecosystem Services in the Bolivian Subandean Humid Forest Introduction

  2016cites this paper
• Kuwaiti consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental protection in Failaka island: a contingent valuation analysis

  2016cites this paper
• What is the Effect of Fuel Efficiency Information on Car Prices? Evidence from Switzerland

  2016cites this paper
• Respondent uncertainty and reliability in contingent valuation—A case of the Dalai Lake protected area

  2016cites this paper
• espondent uncertainty and reliability in contingent valuation — A ase of the Dalai Lake protected area

  2016cites this paper
• Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certainty

  2016cites this paper
• Valuing the non-market benefits of estuarine ecosystem services in a river basin context: testing sensitivity to scope and scale

  2016cites this paper
• Egyptian consumers' willingness to pay for carbon-labeled products: A contingent valuation analysis of socio-economic factors

  2016cites this paper
• Evaluation économique des aires marines protégées : apports méthodologiques et applications aux îles Kuriat (Tunisie)

  2016cites this paper
• Payment for Ecosystem Services in the Bolivian Sub-Andean Humid Forest

  2016cites this paper
• Third-Party Certification, Sponsorship, and Consumers’ Ecolabel Use

  2016cites this paper
• Hypothetical Bias in Risk Preferences as a Driver of Hypothetical Bias in Willingness to Pay: Experimental Evidence

  2016cites this paper
• Travel risk perceptions, travel intentions and influencing factors: A natural disaster context

  2015cites this paper
• Exploring residential energy consumers’ willingness to accept and pay to offset their CO2 emission

  2015cites this paper
• Re-examining empirical evidence on contingent valuation – Importance of incentive compatibility

  2015cites this paper
• Hypothetical Bias in Risk Preferences as a Driver of Hypothetical Bias in Willingness to Pay: Experimental Evidence

  2015cites this paper
• A comparison of mode effects between face-to-face and drop-off contingent valuation surveys

  2015cites this paper
• Optimal Integrated Strategies to Control an Invasive Weed

  2015cites this paper
• Examining lecturers' perspectives on the use of Facebook for academic purposes

  2015cites this paper
• Willingness to pay for ovulation induction treatment in case of WhO ii anovulation: a study using the contingent valuation method

  2014cites this paper
• Willingness to pay for ovulation induction treatment in case of WhO ii anovulation: a study using the contingent valuation method

  2014cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?

  2014cites this paper
• CER-ETH – Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich Does the Swiss Car Market Reward Fuel Efficient Cars? Evidence from Hedonic Pricing Regressions, Matching and a Regression Discontinuity Design

  2014cites this paper
• Willingness to pay for ovulation induction treatment in case of WHO II anovulation: a study using the contingent valuation method

  2014cites this paper
• Evaluating mitigation and calibration techniques for hypothetical bias in choice experiments

  2014cites this paper
• 2013WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys

  2014cites this paper
• Consistently inconsistent: The role of certainty, acceptability and scale in choice

  2013cites this paper
• Face-to-Face and Telephone Surveys – Comparing Different Sampling Methods in Wine Consumer

  2013cites this paper
• Oaths and hypothetical bias.

  2013cites this paper
• Using respondents’ uncertainty scores to mitigate hypothetical bias in community-based health insurance studies

  2013cites this paper
• Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research

  2013cites this paper
• The valuation of forest carbon services by Mexican citizens: the case of Guadalajara city and La Primavera biosphere reserve

  2013cites this paper
• Valuing the external effects of soil contamination: An empirical analysis of a polluted area in Belgium

  2013influential citation
• A Spatial Dynamic Panel Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in European Countries

  2013cites this paper
• HYPOTHETICAL MARKET FAMILIARITY AND THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN STATED AND OBSERVED VALUES FOR GREEN ENERGY

  2013cites this paper
• Keeping up appearances: Motivations for socially desirable responding in contingent valuation interviews

  2013cites this paper
• Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach

  2013cites this paper
• Measuring the Local Costs of Conservation: A Provision Point Mechanism for Eliciting Willingness to Accept Compensation

  2013influential citation
• Exploring Alternative Methodologies for Robust Inferences: Applications in Environmental and Health Economics

  2013cites this paper
• Does Paying More Mean Getting a Better Product: Comparison of Modes of Survey Administration

  2012cites this paper
• Hypothetical Bias, Consequentiality and Choice Experiments

  2012cites this paper
• Social desirability bias in survey research on sustainable development in small firms: an exploratory analysis of survey mode effect

  2012cites this paper
• Inhabitants' Willingness to Pay for Cultural Heritage: A Case Study in Valdivia, Chile, Using Contingent Valuation

  2012cites this paper
• Fossil energy versus nuclear, wind, solar and agricultural biomass: Insights from an Italian national survey

  2012cites this paper
• Measuring the Local Opportunity Costs of Conservation: A Provision Point Mechanism for Willingness-to-Accept.

  2012cites this paper