Abstract Context There has been a rapid growth in the use of data analytics to underpin evidence-based software engineering. However the combination of complex techniques, diverse reporting standards and poorly understood underlying phenomena are causing some concern as to the reliability of studies. Objective Our goal is to provide guidance for producers and consumers of software analytics studies (computational experiments and correlation studies). Method We propose using “bad smells”, i.e., surface indications of deeper problems and popular in the agile software community and consider how they may be manifest in software analytics studies. Results We list 12 “bad smells” in software analytics papers (and show their impact by examples). Conclusions We believe the metaphor of bad smell is a useful device. Therefore we encourage more debate on what contributes to the validity of software analytics studies (so we expect our list will mature over time).
"Bad smells" in software analytics papers
Published 2018 in Information and Software Technology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
Information and Software Technology
- Publication date
2018-03-14
- Fields of study
Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
CITED BY
Showing 1-39 of 39 citing papers · Page 1 of 1