Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice

• Publication date

  2018-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/jep.12805PMID 29076631
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets

  2017cited by this paper
• From Dyadic Ties to Information Infrastructures : Care-Coordination between Patients , Providers , Students and Researchers Contribution of the Health Informatics Education Working Group

  2017cited by this paper
• The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research

  2017cited by this paper
• A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis

  2017cited by this paper
• Development and testing of a medline search filter for identifying patient and public involvement in health research

  2017cited by this paper
• Mind the gap in clinical trials: A participatory action analysis with citizen collaborators

  2017cited by this paper
• The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research

  2016cited by this paper
• The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative.

  2016cited by this paper
• Quality of reporting on patient and public involvement within surgical research: a systematic review.

  2015cited by this paper
• Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)

  2015cited by this paper
• Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch

  2015cited by this paper
• From Dyadic Ties to Information Infrastructures: Care-Coordination between Patients, Providers, Students and Researchers

  2015cited by this paper
• ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research

  2015cited by this paper
• Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework

  2015cited by this paper
• The SWAT (study within a trial) programme; embedding trials to improve the methodological design and conduct of future research

  2015cited by this paper
• Six ‘biases’ against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine

  2015cited by this paper
• Research priority setting in kidney disease: a systematic review.

  2015cited by this paper
• ‘Talking the talk or walking the walk?’ A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009

  2015cited by this paper
• Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.

  2015cited by this paper
• Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting

  2015cited by this paper
• Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding for Clinical Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

  2015cited by this paper
• Involving disabled children and young people as partners in research: a systematic review.

  2015cited by this paper
• ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study

  2015cited by this paper
• Patient Engagement and Canada ’ s SPOR Initiative

  2015cited by this paper
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

  2015cited by this paper
• Patient engagement in research: a systematic review

  2014cited by this paper
• Current Practice of Public Involvement Activities in Biomedical Research and Innovation: A Systematic Qualitative Review

  2014cited by this paper
• Key concepts in consumer and community engagement: a scoping meta-review

  2014cited by this paper
• A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

  2014cited by this paper
• Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review

  2014cited by this paper
• Using the Delphi Method for Qualitative, Participatory Action Research in Health Leadership

  2014cited by this paper
• Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation

  2014cited by this paper
• Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review

  2014cited by this paper
• Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis.

  2014cited by this paper
• Accumulating Research: A Systematic Account of How Cumulative Meta-Analyses Would Have Provided Knowledge, Improved Health, Reduced Harm and Saved Resources

  2014cited by this paper
• Patient Involvement in Outcome Measures for Psoriatic Arthritis

  2014cited by this paper
• A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

  2014cited by this paper
• A Systematic Review of Approaches for Engaging Patients for Research on Rare Diseases

  2014cited by this paper
• Ethical Considerations of Community-based Participatory Research: Contextual Underpinnings for Developing Countries

  2014cited by this paper
• Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.

  2014cited by this paper
• Service user involvement in the evaluation of psycho-social intervention for self-harm: a systematic literature review

  2013cited by this paper
• Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews

  2013cited by this paper
• Understanding GRADE: an introduction

  2013cited by this paper
• ‘Best practice’ in developing and evaluating palliative and end-of-life care services: A meta-synthesis of research methods for the MORECare project

  2013cited by this paper
• Engagement in research: an innovative three-stage review of the benefits for health-care performance

  2013cited by this paper
• Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind Initiative, 2003–2013

  2013cited by this paper
• The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.

  2012cited by this paper
• Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice

  2012cited by this paper
• [GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].

  2012cited by this paper
• Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature

  2012cited by this paper
• Involving the public in systematic reviews: a narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples.

  2012cited by this paper
• Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities

  2011cited by this paper
• Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review

  2011cited by this paper
• GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.

  2011cited by this paper
• The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research

  2011cited by this paper
• Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions

  2011cited by this paper
• The Evidence Base for Interventions Delivered to Children in Primary Care: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews

  2011cited by this paper
• Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

  2010cited by this paper
• Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?

  2010cited by this paper
• Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples.

  2010cited by this paper
• An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC)

  2010cited by this paper
• The PIRICOM study : a systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research

  2010cited by this paper
• Controlling conflict of interest--proposals from the Institute of Medicine.

  2009cited by this paper
• The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

  2009cited by this paper
• Systematic review of reviews of risk factors for intracranial aneurysms

  2008influential reference
• A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research

  2008cited by this paper
• Involving people affected by cancer in research: a review of literature.

  2008cited by this paper
• Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice.

  2008cited by this paper
• External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)

  2007cited by this paper
• Involving older people in health research.

  2007cited by this paper
• Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.

  2007cited by this paper
• Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material.

  2006cited by this paper
• Systematic review of the role of service users as researchers in mental health studies

  2005cited by this paper
• Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach.

  2004cited by this paper
• Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review

  2002cited by this paper
• The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research.

  2000cited by this paper

• Walking the walk: a case study of partnering with patients in designing and delivering a patient and public involvement implementation plan

  2026cites this paper
• Understanding the Unique Ethical Challenges in Randomized Controlled Trials of Delirium Interventions for Older Adults: A Rapid Review.

  2026cites this paper
• A rapid evaluation of the reporting and publishing practices of patient and public involvement and engagement in health research within a UK university institute.

  2026cites this paper
• Evaluating the utility of a patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) end-of-trial event to re-engage with cell-based therapy participants.

  2025cites this paper
• Recognition, remuneration and reimbursement of patient and public involvement partners in pragmatic randomised controlled trials. A survey of author practices

  2025cites this paper
• Patient engagement and shared decision-making in trial recruitment intervention studies: a systematic review

  2025cites this paper
• Patient and public involvement and engagement in methodology research: process, experiences, and recommendations from the SPIRIT- and CONSORT-Surrogate project

  2025cites this paper
• Adapted Safety Plans to Address Self-Harm and Suicide Behaviours in Autistic Adults: single arm feasibility trial and external pilot RCT.

  2025cites this paper
• Engaging longitudinal cohort participants in a research priority setting process for the Raine Study

  2025cites this paper
• The Menopause - Diet Connection: A Critical Review of Nutritional Influences on Women’s Midlife Health

  2025cites this paper
• Participants’ Perspectives on Health Impact, Barriers and Facilitators to Adherence in a Mediterranean Diet Lifestyle Trial

  2025cites this paper
• Improving patient engagement in clinical trials: Launching the BOAT trial with key stakeholders.

  2025cites this paper
• OPENing the door for patient and public involvement in medical research in Singapore

  2025cites this paper
• European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2025 Ethics in Resuscitation.

  2025cites this paper
• Rigor and equity in intervention study design in pediatric psychology: a focus on comparator conditions from diabetes research.

  2025cites this paper
• Gaps in the Engagement of People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Qualitative Study of Untapped Potential

  2025cites this paper
• Randomised clinical trials integrity and patient, carer and public involvement: A scoping umbrella review

  2025influential citation
• Protocol for an umbrella review of the state-of-science on public and patient involvement in health and social care research with children, young people and families.

  2025cites this paper
• Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

  2025cites this paper
• Nutrition Outcomes and Interventions in Older People in Africa: A Systematic Umbrella and Scoping Review.

  2025cites this paper
• Patient and Caregiver Involvement in Identifying and Designing Interventions for Trials in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review

  2025cites this paper
• Engaging community members in health-related research and interventions

  2025cites this paper
• SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials

  2025cites this paper
• CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials

  2025cites this paper
• 'Flexibility is the name of the game’: Clinicians’ Views of Optimal Dose of Psychological Interventions for Psychosis and Paranoia

  2025cites this paper
• Reporting the involvement of patients and caregivers in identifying and designing healthcare interventions: the IDEAS framework.

  2025cites this paper
• Partnering with periodontal patients and care providers to establish research priorities for patient engagement in specialized periodontal care: A study protocol

  2025cites this paper
• Patient and public involvement and engagement in real world data and evidence research across the medicines development cycle: a rapid review of peer-reviewed literature and NICE technology appraisals

  2025cites this paper
• Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?

  2025cites this paper
• “I Feel like the Virtual Reality Really Gives You that Power Back”: A Focus Group Study Exploring Breast Cancer Surgery Patients’ Experiences with a Preoperative Virtual Reality Intervention

  2025cites this paper
• Involving patients and clinicians in the development of a randomised clinical trial protocol to assess spinal manual therapy versus nerve root injection for patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a patient and public involvement project to inform the SALuBRITY trial design

  2024cites this paper
• How can patients shape digital medicine? A rapid review of patient and public involvement and engagement in the development of digital health technologies for neurological conditions

  2024cites this paper
• Evaluation of the design and structure of electronic medication labels to improve patient health knowledge and safety: a systematic review

  2024cites this paper
• Improving completion rates of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer clinical trials: Scoping review investigating the implications for trial designs.

  2024cites this paper
• Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework

  2024cites this paper
• Redefining Collaborative Dynamic in Drug Development: Patient Organizations as New Stakeholders for Oncology Clinical Trials in the U.S.

  2024cites this paper
• Presentation of the first international research network to foster high-quality clinical trials testing non-pharmacological interventions (TRACTION network)

  2024cites this paper
• The Development of Principles for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: A Modified Delphi Study

  2024cites this paper
• Developing a minifesta for effective academic-activist collaboration in the context of the climate emergency

  2024cites this paper
• Head Injury Evaluation and Ambulance Diagnosis (HOME) Study protocol: a feasibility study assessing the implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule in the prehospital setting

  2024cites this paper
• Public Involvement to Enhance Care Home Research; Collaboration on a Minimum Data Set for Care Homes

  2024cites this paper
• Editorial: Driving innovation: harnessing the power of patient input in research

  2024cites this paper
• Asking those who know their needs best: A framework for active engagement and involvement of childhood cancer survivors and parents in the process of psychosocial research—A workshop report

  2024cites this paper
• Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in the Development of a Platform Clinical Trial for Parkinson’s Disease: An Evaluation Protocol

  2024cites this paper
• Experiences of Participation in a Study Investigating Feasibility of the Implantable Doppler Probe in Kidney Transplantation: An Embedded Qualitative Study.

  2024cites this paper
• The critical need to accelerate cerebral palsy research with consumer engagement, global networks, and adaptive designs

  2024cites this paper
• Public involvement in Australian clinical trials: A systematic review

  2024cites this paper
• Sustaining connections: feasibility and impact of long-term virtual patient engagement

  2024cites this paper
• Navigating meaningful engagement: lessons from partnering with youth and families in brain-based disability research

  2024cites this paper
• The applicability of nature-based interventions to support mothers’ postnatal wellbeing: A conceptual review

  2024cites this paper
• The eXpectations of Parents regarding Anesthesiology Study (XPAS) from a parental perspective: a two‐phase observational cross‐sectional cohort study

  2023cites this paper
• A review of reviews exploring patient and public involvement in population health research and development of tools containing best practice guidance

  2023cites this paper
• “I Assumed It Would Be Somebody Who Had a Stroke That Was Doing This”: Views of Stroke Survivors, Caregivers, and Health Professionals on Tailoring a Relaxation and Mindfulness Intervention

  2023cites this paper
• Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned

  2023cites this paper
• Assessment of the Relationship Between Protocol Adherence, Study Complexity and Personnel in Surgical Clinical Trials

  2023cites this paper
• Recruitment rates and strategies in exercise trials in cancer survivorship: a systematic review

  2023cites this paper
• Development of a video-based evidence synthesis knowledge translation resource: Drawing on a user-centred design approach

  2023cites this paper
• Systematic review on the involvement and engagement of patients as advisers for the organisation of organ transplantation services

  2023cites this paper
• Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research

  2023cites this paper
• Are People with Aphasia Included in Stroke Trials? A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

  2023cites this paper
• Patient and Public Involvement in Research: Lessons for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

  2023cites this paper
• Reporting of PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials—a systematic review

  2023cites this paper
• Whose knowledge counts? Involving communities in intervention and trial design using community conversations

  2023influential citation
• Optimizing expert and patient input in pediatric trial design: Lessons learned and recommendations from a collaboration between conect4children and European Patient‐CEntric ClinicAl TRial PLatforms

  2023cites this paper
• Starting a conversation about estimands with public partners involved in clinical trials: a co-developed tool

  2023cites this paper
• Real-world evidence research in metastatic colorectal cancer: raising awareness of the need for patient contributions.

  2023cites this paper
• A Study Protocol Exploring the Role of an Implantable Doppler Probe in Kidney Transplantation: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial with an Embedded Qualitative Study.

  2023cites this paper
• A global neuronopathic gaucher disease registry (GARDIAN): a patient-led initiative

  2023cites this paper
• Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a systematic review of reported practices

  2023cites this paper
• Enriching a randomized controlled treatment trial for anorexia nervosa by lived experience-Chances and effects of a lived experience council in the SUSTAIN study.

  2023cites this paper
• Involving patients and the public in nursing PhD projects: practical guidance, potential benefits and points to consider.

  2023cites this paper
• Management of fraudulent participants in online research: Practical recommendations from a randomized controlled feasibility trial.

  2023cites this paper
• Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey

  2023cites this paper
• Patient and public involvement in lifestyle randomized controlled trials: a systematic review

  2023cites this paper
• Challenges of conducting a randomised placebo-controlled trial of spinal surgery: the SUcceSS trial of lumbar spine decompression

  2023cites this paper
• Assessing Needs and Perceptions of Research Participation in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Multistakeholder Survey.

  2023cites this paper
• Opening up ideas: an advent calendar for patient and public engagement in clinical trials research

  2023cites this paper
• Reducing ‘avoidable research waste’ in applied linguistics research: Insights from healthcare research

  2023cites this paper
• Gaps between needs of patient and public involvement and interests of researchers on pancreatic cancer.

  2023cites this paper
• How common is patient and public involvement (PPI)? Cross-sectional analysis of frequency of PPI reporting in health research papers and associations with methods, funding sources and other factors

  2022cites this paper
• Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis

  2022influential citation
• A Systematic Review of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Bariatric Research Trials: The Need for More Work

  2022cites this paper
• Clinical outcome measures in dementia with Lewy bodies trials: critique and recommendations

  2022cites this paper
• A Systemic Approach to the Oversight of Machine Learning Clinical Translation

  2022cites this paper
• How to design high quality acupuncture trials—a consensus informed by evidence

  2022cites this paper
• Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids

  2022cites this paper
• Patient-prioritized primary endpoints in clinical trials

  2022cites this paper
• Are digital citizen panels an innovative, deliberative approach to cardiovascular research?

  2022cites this paper
• Learnings from user feedback of a novel digital mental health assessment

  2022cites this paper
• Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation

  2022cites this paper
• Comparing the effects of a patient-designed-and-informed participant information leaflet in comparison with a standard, researcher-designed information leaflet on recruitment, retention and understanding: A study-within-a-trial

  2022cites this paper
• Benefits of Participation in Clinical Trials: An Umbrella Review

  2022cites this paper
• Commentary: an industry perspective on the importance of incorporating participant voice before, during, and after clinical trials

  2022cites this paper
• Patient engagement as a core element of translating clinical evidence into practice- application of the COM-B model behaviour change model

  2022cites this paper
• Are you ready for patient engagement in health care?

  2022cites this paper
• Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison to not reading a book in bed? The People’s Trial—an online, pragmatic, randomised trial

  2021cites this paper
• Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers

  2021cites this paper
• Who should I involve in my research and why? Patients, carers or the public?

  2021cites this paper
• Children and young people’s contributions to public involvement and engagement activities in health-related research: A scoping review

  2021cites this paper
• Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review

  2021influential citation