Are Randomized Controlled Trials Controlled? Patient Preferences and Unblind Trials

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1997

• Venue

  Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

• Publication date

  1997-12-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/014107689709001205PMID 9496288PMCID PMC1296732
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Assessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer.

  1998cited by this paper
• Should breast reduction surgery be rationed?

  1997cited by this paper
• Pandora and the problem of evil.

  1996cited by this paper
• Financial hijacking of conferences.

  1996cited by this paper
• Letters to the EditorCreutzfeldt-Jakob disease

  1996cited by this paper
• Pandora and the problem of evil.

  1996cited by this paper
• Patients' preferences and randomised trials.

  1996cited by this paper
• Patient Preferences in Randomised Trials: Threat or Opportunity?

  1996cited by this paper
• Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

  1996cited by this paper
• Patients' preferences and randomised trials.

  1996cited by this paper
• Placebo mania

  1996cited by this paper
• Effect of random versus nonrandom assignment in a comparison of inpatient and day hospital rehabilitation for male alcoholics.

  1995cited by this paper
• Equipoise and the ethics of randomization.

  1995cited by this paper
• Harnessing placebo effects in health care.

  1994cited by this paper
• Placebo effect in double-blind clinical trials: a review of interactions with medications.

  1994cited by this paper
• The Cochrane Lecture. The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making.

  1994cited by this paper
• Patients' preferences and randomised trials.

  1994cited by this paper
• Psychology and survival.

  1994cited by this paper
• Comparison of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping at 10-13 weeks' gestation.

  1994cited by this paper
• Diseases with passion.

  1993cited by this paper
• Psychology and survival.

  1993cited by this paper
• Tribulations for clinical trials.

  1991cited by this paper
• Persistently low natural killer cell activity, age, and environmental stress as predictors of infectious morbidity.

  1991cited by this paper
• Physiologic and psychobehavioral research in oncology

  1991cited by this paper
• Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.

  1989cited by this paper
• A two-stage trial design for testing treatment, self-selection and treatment preference effects.

  1989cited by this paper
• The Ceremonial Order of the Clinic: Parents, Doctors and Medical Bureaucracies (Book).

  1981cited by this paper
• Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the coronary drug project.

  1980cited by this paper

• Preference, Dropout, and Clinical Outcomes in Face-to-Face Versus Video-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents

  2025cites this paper
• Unlocking Patient Voices: Advancing Physical Therapist Practice with Discrete Choice Experiments.

  2024cites this paper
• Design and analysis of partially randomized preference trials with propensity score stratification

  2022cites this paper
• Yoga for chronic non-specific low back pain.

  2022cites this paper
• The effect of choice interventions on retention-related, behavioural and mood outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis

  2021cites this paper
• Exposure Therapy: Stimulus Intensity as a Factor in Treatment Preference

  2021cites this paper
• Factors associated with edentulous patients’ willingness about implant-supported complete denture: a multivariate analysis

  2021cites this paper
• Nonsurgical treatment outcomes for surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation: a comprehensive cohort study

  2021cites this paper
• Percutaneous Venous Angioplasty in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis And Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency: A Randomized Wait List Control Study.

  2020cites this paper
• Impact of patient characteristics on edentulous subjects’ preferences for prosthodontic rehabilitation with implants

  2019cites this paper
• Sample size and power for a stratified doubly randomized preference design

  2018cites this paper
• What Can We Learn From A Doubly Randomized Preference Trial?—An Instrumental Variables Perspective

  2017cites this paper
• Hip resurfacing: Perceptions after the storm

  2017cites this paper
• Treatment expectations but not preference affect outcome in a trial of CBT and exercise for pain

  2017cites this paper
• Yoga treatment for chronic non-specific low back pain.

  2017cites this paper
• Response from the authors

  2016cites this paper
• Factors associated with interest in receiving prison-based methadone maintenance therapy in Malaysia.

  2016cites this paper
• The Future of Opioid Agonist Therapies in Ukraine: A Qualitative Assessment of Multilevel Barriers and Ways Forward to Promote Retention in Treatment.

  2016cites this paper
• A measurement framework for adherence in patient decision aid trials applied in a systematic review subanalysis.

  2016cites this paper
• Qigong versus exercise therapy for chronic low back pain in adults – A randomized controlled non‐inferiority trial

  2015cites this paper
• “Bureaucracy & Beliefs”: Assessing the barriers to accessing opioid substitution therapy by people who inject drugs in Ukraine

  2015cites this paper
• An exploratory qualitative assessment of self-reported treatment outcomes and satisfaction among patients accessing an innovative voluntary drug treatment centre in Malaysia.

  2015cites this paper
• Randomized study designs for lifestyle interventions: a tutorial.

  2015cites this paper
• Preference and Expectation for Treatment Assignment in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Once- vs Twice-weekly Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain

  2015cites this paper
• Moderating factors for the effectiveness of group art therapy for schizophrenia: secondary analysis of data from the MATISSE randomised controlled trial

  2014cites this paper
• Sample Size and Power When Designing a Randomized Trial for the Estimation of Treatment, Selection, and Preference Effects

  2014cites this paper
• n exploratory qualitative assessment of self-reported treatment utcomes and satisfaction among patients accessing an innovative oluntary drug treatment centre in Malaysia ansur

  2014cites this paper
• Design and methods of "diaBEAT-it!": a hybrid preference/randomized control trial design using the RE-AIM framework.

  2014cites this paper
• Review of Designs for Accommodating Patients’ or Physicians’ Preferences in Randomized Controlled Trials

  2014cites this paper
• The influence of femoral head size following total hip replacement and hip resurfacing on hip biomechanics during walking, stair use and sit-to-stand

  2013cites this paper
• Insufficient evidence to determine the impact of patient preferences on clinical outcomes in acupuncture trials: a systematic review.

  2013cites this paper
• Understanding Patient Values and the Manifestations in Clinical Research with Traditional Chinese Medicine—With Practical Suggestions for Trial Design and Implementation

  2013cites this paper
• One-to-one therapy is not superior to group or home-based therapy after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, superiority trial.

  2013cites this paper
• Patient Preference Clinical Trials: Why and When They Will Sometimes Be Preferred

  2013cites this paper
• CARPET1 trial Women's views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the

  2013cites this paper
• Causal Effects Under Self-Selection

  2013cites this paper
• A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of exercise, spinal manipulation, and neuro emotional technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain

  2012cites this paper
• The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/07/011)

  2012cites this paper
• PATIENTS ’ PREFERENCES MATTER Stop the silent misdiagnosis

  2012cites this paper
• No clear influence of preference bias on satisfaction and early functional outcome in resurfacing hip arthroplasty

  2011influential citation
• Determining the Impact of Informed Choice

  2011cites this paper
• Women’s views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the CARPET1 trial

  2010cites this paper
• Participants' preferences for HIV prevention interventions.

  2010cites this paper
• Conceptual, Design, and Statistical Complications Associated with Participant Preference

  2010cites this paper
• Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).

  2009cites this paper
• Randomized controlled trials of the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: 1983-2007.

  2008cites this paper
• Patient Preferences and Expectations for Care: Determinants in Patients With Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

  2008cites this paper
• Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis

  2008cites this paper
• Do patients’ preferences matter?

  2008cites this paper
• Patient and clinician treatment preferences do not moderate the effect of exercise treatment in chronic whiplash‐associated disorders

  2008cites this paper
• Shouldn't standard rheumatology clinical care be evidence-based rather than eminence-based, eloquence-based, or elegance-based?

  2007cites this paper
• Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments

  2007cites this paper
• Placebo surgery research: a blinding imperative.

  2006cites this paper
• non-randomised studies the evidence: choosing between randomised and Methods in health services research: Interpreting

  2006cites this paper
• Understanding treatment decision making: Contexts, commonalities, complexities, and challenges

  2006cites this paper
• Primer: assessing the efficacy and safety of nonpharmacologic treatments for chronic rheumatic diseases

  2006cites this paper
• Optimizing Health: Improving the Value of Healthcare Delivery

  2006cites this paper
• A comparison of socio-demographic and psychological factors between patients consenting to randomisation and those selecting treatment (the ProtecT study).

  2006cites this paper
• Are the Results of Randomized Trials Influenced by Preference Effects? Part I. Findings from a Systematic Review

  2006cites this paper
• Are the Results of Randomized Trials Influenced by Preference Effects? Part II. Why Current Studies Often Fail to Answer this Question

  2006cites this paper
• The ethics of single blind trials.

  2005cites this paper
• Changes in beliefs identify unblinding in randomized controlled trials: a method to meet CONSORT guidelines.

  2005cites this paper
• Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.

  2005cites this paper
• An assessment of willingness to participate in a randomized trial of arthroscopic knee surgery in patients with osteoarthritis.

  2005cites this paper
• Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa.

  2005cites this paper
• Checking for interviewer bias in outcome assessment: a method for strengthening the design of prospective, randomised trials in surgery

  2004cites this paper
• What influences participants' treatment preference and can it influence outcome? Results from a primary care-based randomised trial for shoulder pain.

  2004cites this paper
• Applying evidence to support ethical decisions: Is the placebo really powerless?

  2004cites this paper
• Evaluating the Feasibility of Developing National Outcomes Data Bases to Assist Patients with Making Treatment Decisions

  2004cites this paper
• Effectiveness of physical therapy for patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial.

  2004cites this paper
• The role of choice in health education intervention trials: a review and case study.

  2003cites this paper
• Generalizability of guidelines and physicians' adherence. Case study on the Sixth Joint National Commitee's guidelines on hypertension

  2003cites this paper
• Guidelines for monitoring of methotrexate therapy: "evidence-based medicine" outside of clinical trials.

  2003cites this paper
• Evaluating preference effects in partially unblinded, randomized clinical trials.

  2003cites this paper
• Osteoarthritis IV: Clinical therapeutic trials and treatment

  2002cites this paper
• Integrated Care Pathways in Mental Health: The Need for the ‘Human Touch’

  2002cites this paper
• The Placebo Effect in Alternative Medicine: Can the Performance of a Healing Ritual Have Clinical Significance?

  2002cites this paper
• Who will enroll? Predicting participation in a phase II AIDS vaccine trial.

  2001cites this paper
• Who Will Enroll? Predicting Participation in a Phase II AIDS Vaccine Trial

  2001cites this paper
• Mechanical Cardiac Support 2000: Current applications and future trial design.

  2001cites this paper
• Patients, preferences, and evidence.

  2001cites this paper
• Mechanical cardiac support 2000: current applications and future trial design. June 15-16, 2000 Bethesda, Maryland.

  2001cites this paper
• Evidence based medicine: the median is not the message.

  2001cites this paper
• Mechanical cardiac support 2000: current applications and future trial design.

  2001cites this paper
• Jugement clinique et médecine basée sur les preuves (evidence-based medicine)

  2001cites this paper
• Preferences and understanding their effects on health.

  2001cites this paper
• Será que ensaios clínicos aleatórios podem inspirar decisões clínicas sobre pacientes individuais

  2001cites this paper
• Preferences and understanding their effects on health

  2001cites this paper
• Mechanical cardiac support 2000: current applications and future trial design: June 15-16, 2000 Bethesda, Maryland.

  2001cites this paper
• Preferences and understanding their effects on health*

  2001cites this paper
• Clinical judgement and evidence-based medicine.

  2001cites this paper
• The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis.

  2000cites this paper
• Participation and innovation

  2000cites this paper
• Informed adherence: the need for shared medical decision making.

  2000cites this paper
• Commentary: patients, preferences, and evidence.

  2000cites this paper
• Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial.

  2000cites this paper
• A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.

  2000cites this paper
• Will you have a glass of red or white wine?

  1999cites this paper
• The impact of patient treatment preferences on the interpretation of randomised controlled trials.

  1999cites this paper
• Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies

  1999cites this paper