Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Law and Human Behavior

• Publication date

  2012-06-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1037/h0093923PMID 22667814
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion.

  2011cited by this paper
• Sequential Lineup Laps and Eyewitness Accuracy

  2011cited by this paper
• Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.

  2010cited by this paper
• Exploring the Sequential Lineup Advantage Using WITNESS

  2010cited by this paper
• The Effect of Retention Interval on the Confidence–Accuracy Relationship for Eyewitness Identification

  2010cited by this paper
• Public policy and sequential lineups

  2009cited by this paper
• Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.

  2009cited by this paper
• Instruction Bias and Lineup Presentation Moderate the Effects of Administrator Knowledge on Eyewitness Identification

  2009cited by this paper
• Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy

  2009cited by this paper
• Can a Lineup Procedure Designed for Child Witnesses Work for Adults? Comparing Simultaneous, Sequential, and Elimination Lineup Procedures

  2008cited by this paper
• Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.

  2008cited by this paper
• Regularities in Eyewitness Identification

  2008cited by this paper
• Theory, Logic and Data : Paths to a More Coherent Eyewitness Science

  2008cited by this paper
• The importance (necessity) of computational modelling for eyewitness identification research

  2008cited by this paper
• Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.

  2008cited by this paper
• PC_Eyewitness: Evaluating the New Jersey method

  2007cited by this paper
• Positive versus negative face recognition decisions: confidence, accuracy, and response latency

  2006cited by this paper
• A signal detection model of compound decision tasks

  2006cited by this paper
• Sequential vs. Simultaneous Lineups: A Review of Methods, Data, and Theory.

  2006cited by this paper
• A POLICY EVALUATION OF SIMULTANEOUS AND SEQUENTIAL LINEUPS

  2006cited by this paper
• Eyewitness Evidence

  2006cited by this paper
• The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.

  2006cited by this paper
• Comparing identification procedures when the perpetrator has changed appearance

  2006cited by this paper
• Accuracy of eyewitnesses with a two-culprit crime: Testing a new identification procedure

  2006cited by this paper
• An analysis of multiple choices in MSL lineups, and a comparison with simultaneous and sequential ones

  2006cited by this paper
• Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis

  2005cited by this paper
• Non-biased lineup instructions do matter – a problem for older witnesses

  2005cited by this paper
• PC_Eyewitness and the Sequential Superiority Effect: Computer-Based Lineup Administration

  2005cited by this paper
• Aiding the Performance of Older Eyewitnesses: Enhanced Non-Biased Line-Up Instructions and Line-Up Presentation

  2005cited by this paper
• The Target-to-Foils Shift in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups

  2005cited by this paper
• Multiple independent identification decisions: a method of calibrating eyewitness identifications.

  2004cited by this paper
• Sequential lineups: shift in criterion or decision strategy?

  2004cited by this paper
• A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification

  2003influential reference
• Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help?

  2003cited by this paper
• Simultaneous v. sequential lineups: What do we really know?

  2002cited by this paper
• Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Sequential and Simultaneous Lineup Presentations: A Meta-Analytic Comparison

  2001cited by this paper
• Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses.

  2001cited by this paper
• Elimination lineups : An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses

  1999cited by this paper
• N Guilty Men

  1997cited by this paper
• Simultaneous Lineups, Sequential Lineups, and Showups: Eyewitness Identification Decisions of Adults and Children

  1997cited by this paper
• What do we know about eyewitness identification?

  1993cited by this paper
• An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children's and adults' eyewitness identifications

  1993cited by this paper
• Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups

  1993cited by this paper
• Testing global memory models using ROC curves.

  1992cited by this paper
• Sequential lineup presentation : technique matters

  1991cited by this paper
• Detection Theory: A User's Guide

  1991cited by this paper
• Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.

  1991cited by this paper
• Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups

  1991cited by this paper
• Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.

  1989cited by this paper
• Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.

  1988cited by this paper
• Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation.

  1985cited by this paper
• Meta-analytic procedures for social research

  1984cited by this paper
• The Psychology of Lineup Identifications1

  1984cited by this paper
• Reasons for confidence.

  1980cited by this paper
• Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

  1980cited by this paper
• Visual detection and localization of radiographic images.

  1975cited by this paper
• Sokal, R. R., and I. J. Rohlf: Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco 1969, XXI + 776 S., 89 Abb., 56 Tab., Preis 126/—

  1970cited by this paper
• Signal detection theory and psychophysics

  1966cited by this paper
• Handbook of Social Psychology.

  1955cited by this paper

• Protecting the innocent in eyewitness identification: An analysis of simultaneous and ranking lineups

  2025cites this paper
• The cognitive science of eyewitness memory.

  2025cites this paper
• A multi-item signal detection theory model for eyewitness identification

  2025cites this paper
• Clarifying the effects of sequential item presentation in the police lineup task.

  2024cites this paper
• Improving the diagnostic value of lineup rejections.

  2024cites this paper
• Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects

  2024cites this paper
• Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.

  2024cites this paper
• Appearances can be deceiving: how naturalistic changes to target appearance impact on lineup-based decision-making

  2023cites this paper
• Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups

  2022cites this paper
• Modeling face similarity in police lineups.

  2022cites this paper
• A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data

  2022cites this paper
• Improving face identification of mask-wearing individuals

  2022cites this paper
• Confidence judgments are associated with face identification accuracy: Findings from a confidence forced-choice task

  2022cites this paper
• University of Birmingham Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy

  2021cites this paper
• Can Familiarity Between an Adolescent Eyewitness and a Perpetrator Influence Identification Accuracy?

  2021cites this paper
• The potential for qualitative triangulation to mitigate investigative negligence

  2021cites this paper
• Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance

  2020cites this paper
• Running head: EYEWITNESS MEMORY 1 Eyewitness Memory

  2020cites this paper
• Threshold Escalation in Product Lineups

  2020cites this paper
• “Only your first yes will count”: The impact of pre-lineup instructions on sequential lineup decisions

  2020cites this paper
• Live Presentation for Eyewitness Identification is Not Superior to Photo or Video Presentation

  2020cites this paper
• “All I remember is the black eye”: A distinctive facial feature harms eyewitness identification

  2020cites this paper
• Refining the blank line‐up procedure: How should we instruct eyewitnesses?

  2020cites this paper
• The effects of explicit “Not Present” and “Don't Know” response options on identification decisions in computer‐administered lineups

  2020cites this paper
• Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

  2020influential citation
• A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification

  2020cites this paper
• Line-Up Image Position in Simultaneous and Sequential Line-Ups: The Effects of Age and Viewing Distance on Selection Patterns

  2020cites this paper
• Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists

  2020cites this paper
• Product Lineups: The More You Search, The Less You Find

  2020cites this paper
• The distance threshold of reliable eyewitness identification.

  2019cites this paper
• Designing police lineups to maximize memory performance.

  2019cites this paper
• The Influence of Recall Instructions on the Verbal Overshadowing Effect

  2019cites this paper
• Absolute and Relative Decision Processes in Eyewitness Identification

  2019cites this paper
• Victims as aggressors: Does victim-bystander status influence eyewitness decision-making in showup procedures?

  2019cites this paper
• Identifying the masked perpetrator: A new hope

  2019influential citation
• Pitfalls in using eyewitness confidence to diagnose the accuracy of an individual identification decision.

  2019cites this paper
• Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?

  2019cites this paper
• The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications

  2019cites this paper
• The Open University ’ s repository of research publications and other research outputs Identification Evidence Book Section

  2019cites this paper
• Identification Performance from Multiple Lineups: Should Eyewitnesses Who Pick Fillers Be Burned?

  2019cites this paper
• Identification Accuracy of Adolescent Eyewitnesses: The Role of Familiarity and Lineup Procedure

  2018cites this paper
• Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification

  2018cites this paper
• Does Filler Database Size Influence Identification Accuracy?

  2018cites this paper
• Running head : MODELS OF LINEUP MEMORY 1 Models of Lineup Memory

  2018cites this paper
• Models of lineup memory.

  2018cites this paper
• Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups

  2018cites this paper
• Racial Bias Increases False Identification of Black Suspects in Simultaneous Lineups

  2018cites this paper
• Same-Race and Other-Race Eyewitness Identification Accuracy - The Bracket Lineup is as Good as Old

  2018influential citation
• The effects of sequential and simultaneous lineup procedures on confidence and accuracy of identity judgements

  2018cites this paper
• University of Birmingham A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan

  2018cites this paper
• Undermining Position Effects in Choices From Arrays, With Implications for Police Lineups

  2017cites this paper
• Why eyewitnesses fail

  2017cites this paper
• 2.29 – Eyewitness Identification☆

  2017cites this paper
• Assessing Law Enforcement Performance in Behavior-Based Threat Detection Tasks Involving a Concealed Weapon or Device

  2017cites this paper
• Memory Strength and Lineup Presentation Moderate Effects of Administrator Influence on Mistaken Identifications

  2017cites this paper
• How Sure Are You That This Is the Man You Saw? Child Witnesses Can Use Confidence Judgments to Identify a Target

  2017cites this paper
• A Repeated Forced‐choice Line‐up Procedure Provides Suspect Bias Information with No Cost to Accuracy for Older Children and Adults

  2017cites this paper
• Fair Lineups Are Better Than Biased Lineups and Showups, but Not Because They Increase Underlying Discriminability

  2017cites this paper
• A Repeated Forced-Choice Lineup Procedure: Examining the Impact on Child and Adult Eyewitnesses

  2017cites this paper
• The elimination-plus lineup: Testing a modified lineup procedure with confidence

  2017cites this paper
• Using Measurement Models to Understand Eyewitness Identification

  2017influential citation
• A Signal-Detection Analysis of Eyewitness Identification Across the Adult Lifespan

  2017cites this paper
• The Effect of Backloading Instructions on Eyewitness Identification from Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups

  2016cites this paper
• Identifying the Culprit: An International Perspective on the National Academy of Sciences Report on Eyewitness Identification Evidence

  2016cites this paper
• 1 Eyewitness Identification

  2016cites this paper
• Face-off: A new identification procedure for child eyewitnesses.

  2016cites this paper
• Eyewitness Identification: Research, Reform, and Reversal

  2016cites this paper
• Theoretical and real-world applications of superior face recognition

  2016cites this paper
• Eyewitness identification performance on lineups for distinctive suspects

  2016cites this paper
• From the Pigeon Lab to the Courtroom

  2016cites this paper
• Simultaneous, Sequential, Elimination, and Wildcard: A Comparison of Lineup Procedures

  2016cites this paper
• Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures

  2016cites this paper
• The effects of allowing a second sequential lineup lap on choosing and probative value

  2015cites this paper
• Assessing the Reliability of Multiple-Showup Procedures With a Single Eyewitness

  2015cites this paper
• Age and lineup type differences in the own-race bias

  2015cites this paper
• First impressions in familiar eyewitness identifications improve accuracy in target absent lineups

  2015cites this paper
• Field study of response accuracy and decision confidence with regard to lineup composition and lineup presentation

  2015influential citation
• Lineup Composition and Lineup Fairness

  2015cites this paper
• Confidence and Accuracy of Eyewitness Identification

  2015cites this paper
• Choice deferral can arise from absolute evaluations or relative comparisons.

  2015cites this paper
• Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.

  2015cites this paper
• Eyewitness Identification and the Accuracy of the Criminal Justice System

  2015cites this paper
• Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.

  2015cites this paper
• Simultaneous, Sequential, Elimination, and Wildcard: A Comparison of Lineup Procedures

  2015cites this paper
• An evaluation of lineup presentation, weapon presence, and a distinctive feature using ROC analysis

  2014cites this paper
• System-Based Research on Eyewitness Identification

  2014cites this paper
• A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.

  2014cites this paper
• ommentary issing the information needed to perform ROC analysis ? Then ompute d ′ , not the diagnosticity ratio

  2014cites this paper
• Running head: THE SUGGESTIVE INFLUENCE OF LINEUPS THE SUGGESTIVE INFLUENCE OF LINEUPS ON MEMORY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS

  2014cites this paper
• Eyewitness identification discriminability: ROC analysis versus logistic regression

  2014cites this paper
• Eyewitness Identification

  2014influential citation
• Missing the information needed to perform ROC analysis? Then compute d , not the diagnosticity ratio

  2014cites this paper
• Sequential lineups reduce unconscious transference and mistaken lineup identification: but at what cost?

  2013cites this paper
• Understanding gender bias in face recognition: effects of divided attention at encoding.

  2013cites this paper
• A Signal-Detection-Based Diagnostic-Feature Model of Eyewitness Identification

  2013cites this paper
• Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.

  2013cites this paper
• Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform

  2013cites this paper
• Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.

  2012cites this paper
• Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.

  2012cites this paper
• Using confidence ratings to identify a target among foils

  2012cites this paper