Using pre-test explanations to improve test-taker reactions: Testing a set of “wise” interventions

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

• Publication date

  2017-07-01

• Fields of study

  Business, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.OBHDP.2017.04.002
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Applicant Perspectives During Selection: A Review Addressing “So What?,” “What’s New?,” and “Where to Next?”

  2017cited by this paper
• The Impracticality of Recruitment Research

  2017cited by this paper
• Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness Perceptions in Personnel Selection

  2017cited by this paper
• Investigating the Effects of Applicant Justice Perceptions on Job Offer Acceptance

  2016cited by this paper
• Antecedents and Consequences of Procedural Fairness Perceptions in Personnel Selection: A Three-Year Longitudinal Study

  2016cited by this paper
• Inattentive Responding in MTurk and Other Online Samples

  2015cited by this paper
• A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment

  2015cited by this paper
• Correlational effect size benchmarks.

  2015influential reference
• The New Science of Wise Psychological Interventions

  2014influential reference
• A century of selection.

  2014cited by this paper
• A Unified Framework of Recruiter Behavior With Implications for Using the Best to Recruit the Rest

  2014cited by this paper
• The role of trustworthiness in recruitment and selection: A review and guide for future research

  2013cited by this paper
• Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.

  2013cited by this paper
• Is This How I Will Be Treated? Reducing Uncertainty through Recruitment Interactions

  2013cited by this paper
• Personnel selection as a signaling game.

  2012cited by this paper
• A Field Study of Pretest and Posttest Reactions to a Paper-and-Pencil and a Computerized In-Basket Exercise

  2012cited by this paper
• Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

  2012cited by this paper
• Helping Parents to Motivate Adolescents in Mathematics and Science

  2012cited by this paper
• Recruiting Through the Stages: A Meta‐Analytic Test of Predictors of Applicant Attraction at Different Stages of the Recruiting Process

  2012cited by this paper
• Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self

  2011cited by this paper
• LMX, Coaching Attributions, and Employee Performance

  2011cited by this paper
• Writing About Testing Worries Boosts Exam Performance in the Classroom

  2011cited by this paper
• How leaders stimulate employee learning: A leader-member exchange approach

  2010cited by this paper
• Causes and Effects of Employee Downsizing: A Review and Synthesis

  2010cited by this paper
• Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks

  2009cited by this paper
• Rejected But Still There: Shifting the Focus in Applicant Reactions to the Promotional Context

  2009cited by this paper
• When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don't.

  2009cited by this paper
• PROGRESSION THROUGH THE RANKS: ASSESSING EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO HIGH-STAKES EMPLOYMENT TESTING

  2009cited by this paper
• Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A Meta-Analytic Review

  2009cited by this paper
• Not much more than platitudes? A critical look at the utility of applicant reactions research

  2008cited by this paper
• Reassurance: Help or hinder in the treatment of pain

  2008cited by this paper
• G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

  2007cited by this paper
• The Influence of Perceived Interviewer and Job and Organizational Characteristics on Applicant Attraction and Job Choice Intentions: The Role of Applicant Anxiety

  2007cited by this paper
• The influence of prefeedback selection justice on perceptions of overall procedural justice and organizational attractiveness in a real-life selection procedure

  2007cited by this paper
• Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis

  2006cited by this paper
• Effects of another person’s fair treatment on one’s own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much the other cares for you

  2006cited by this paper
• Stages of the Recruitment Process and the Referrer's Performance Effect

  2006cited by this paper
• Selection in the Information Age: The Impact of Privacy Concerns and Computer Experience on Applicant Reactions

  2006cited by this paper
• Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review

  2005cited by this paper
• Testing the Rules of Justice: The Effects of Frame-of-Reference and Pre-Test Validity Information on Personality Test Responses and Test Perceptions

  2005cited by this paper
• Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes.

  2005cited by this paper
• Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis

  2004influential reference
• An Agenda for Future Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: A Construct-Oriented Approach

  2004cited by this paper
• Sorting things out: valuation of new firms in uncertain markets

  2004cited by this paper
• Measuring job interview anxiety: Beyond weak knees and sweaty palms.

  2004cited by this paper
• Designing Personable and Informative Job Recruiting Web Sites: Testing the Effect of the Design on Attractiveness and Intent to Apply

  2004cited by this paper
• Manipulation de l'intolérance a l'incertitude et inquiétudes.

  2004cited by this paper
• The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining When Selection Fairness Really Matters

  2004cited by this paper
• To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations.

  2003cited by this paper
• Effective Interventions on Test Anxiety Reduction

  2003cited by this paper
• Understanding Racial Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests in Selection Contexts: An Integration of Stereotype Threat and Applicant Reactions Research

  2003cited by this paper
• Reciprocity in Manager-Subordinate Relationships: Components, Configurations, and Outcomes

  2003cited by this paper
• Applicant Perceptions of Selection Procedures: The Role of Selection Information, Belief in Tests, and Comparative Anxiety

  2003cited by this paper
• Procedural justice and organizational staffing: a tale of two paradigms

  2003cited by this paper
• Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships.

  2002cited by this paper
• Perceived Beneficiary of Employee Development Activity: A Three-Dimensional Social Exchange Model

  2002cited by this paper
• Coworker exchange: relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes.

  2002cited by this paper
• Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.

  2002cited by this paper
• Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study.

  2002cited by this paper
• When fairness works : Toward a general theory of uncertainty management

  2002cited by this paper
• Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.

  2001influential reference
• Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.

  2001cited by this paper
• APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS)

  2001cited by this paper
• The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory

  2001cited by this paper
• Organizational Attractiveness as an Employer on College Campuses: An Examination of the Applicant Population

  2001cited by this paper
• Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders: A Step-by-Step Treatment Manual

  2001cited by this paper
• Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory.

  2001cited by this paper
• IMPROVING APPLICANTS' REACTIONS TO REJECTION LETTERS: AN APPLICATION OF FAIRNESS THEORY

  2001cited by this paper
• Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance.

  2001cited by this paper
• Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation.

  2000cited by this paper
• Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future

  2000cited by this paper
• Experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty: a study of a theoretical model of worry.

  2000cited by this paper
• The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions.

  2000cited by this paper
• Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework

  1999cited by this paper
• Longitudinal Assessment of Applicant Reactions to Employment Testing and Test Outcome Feedback

  1998cited by this paper
• Applicant Perceptions of Test Fairness: Integrating Justice and Self-Serving Bias Perspectives

  1998cited by this paper
• Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management

  1998cited by this paper
• Applicant Attraction to Firms: Influences of Organization Reputation, Job and Organizational Attributes, and Recruiter Behaviors.

  1998cited by this paper
• Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions

  1997cited by this paper
• Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next.

  1997cited by this paper
• Alternative Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off?

  1997cited by this paper
• Racial subgroup differences in predictive validity perceptions on personality and cognitive ability tests.

  1997cited by this paper
• How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.

  1997cited by this paper
• Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective

  1997cited by this paper
• The Effect of Selection Ratio on Perceptions of the Fairness of a Selection Test Battery

  1997cited by this paper
• Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future.

  1997cited by this paper
• Does humor moderate the effects of experimentally-induced stress?

  1996cited by this paper
• Is Humor Only Fun, An Alternative Cure or Magic? The Cognitive Therapeutic Potential of Humor

  1996cited by this paper
• Perceived fairness of personality tests and the impact of explanations for their use

  1995cited by this paper
• Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective

  1995cited by this paper
• Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system.

  1994cited by this paper
• THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTs' REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT CENTER

  1994cited by this paper
• Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectives

  1993cited by this paper
• Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results.

  1993cited by this paper
• The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice.

  1993cited by this paper
• The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective

  1993cited by this paper
• When small effects are impressive

  1992cited by this paper
• Interdisciplinary Examination of the Costs and Benefits of Enlarged Jobs: A Job Design Quasi-Experiment

  1991cited by this paper
• Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

  1990cited by this paper
• MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING

  1990influential reference

• Green Interviews? The Influence of Explaining the Environmental Benefits of Video Interviews on Applicant Reactions

  2026cites this paper
• Personalizing explanations in AI-based decisions: The effects of personalization and (mis)aligning with individual preferences

  2025cites this paper
• Applicant reactions to digital selection procedures

  2025cites this paper
• Role Models in Action Through YouTube Videos for Engineering Community College Students

  2024cites this paper
• Examining the efficacy of inoculation and value‐affirmation interventions in improving precandidate reactions among prospective military recruits

  2024cites this paper
• Improving Reactions to Forced-Choice Personality Measures in Simulated Job Application Contexts Through the Satisfaction of Psychological Needs

  2023cites this paper
• Evaluation of warning strategies to reduce faking during military recruitment

  2023cites this paper
• Simulated job applicant test-taker reactions to rejection: comparing absolute and social-comparative feedback

  2023influential citation
• Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures

  2023cites this paper
• Spare me the details: How the type of information about automated interviews influences applicant reactions

  2021influential citation
• Horse-Sized Ducks or Duck-Sized Horses? Oddball Personality Questions Are Likable (but Useless) for Organizational Recruitment

  2021cites this paper
• Can explanations improve applicant reactions towards gamified assessment methods?

  2021cites this paper
• Expanding conceptual understanding of interview anxiety and performance: Integrating cognitive, behavioral, and physiological features

  2021cites this paper
• Distressed and distracted by COVID-19 during high-stakes virtual interviews: The role of job interview anxiety on performance and reactions.

  2021cites this paper
• Reactions to some ICT-based personnel selection tools

  2021cites this paper
• Horse-Sized Ducks or Duck-Sized Horses? Oddball Personality Questions Are Likable (but Useless) for Organizational Recruitment

  2021cites this paper
• Smile for the camera! The role of social presence and impression management in perceptions of technology-mediated interviews

  2020cites this paper
• An examination of the relationship between applicant race and accrued recruitment source information: Implications for applicant withdrawal and test performance

  2020cites this paper
• ‘SELF-IE’ MODULE: A COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY INTERVENTION TO SUPPORT SELF-CHANGE AND WORK-PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT OF LOW-PERFORMING CIVIL SERVANTS

  2020cites this paper
• The development and validation of the Privacy and Data Security Concerns Scale (PDSCS)

  2020cites this paper
• Is It Possible to Improve Test Takers’ Perceptions of Ability Tests by Providing an Explanation?

  2019cites this paper
• Fair and Flexible?! Explanations Can Improve Applicant Reactions Toward Asynchronous Video Interviews

  2019cites this paper
• The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants’ Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction

  2019cites this paper
• Akceptacja różnych form narzędzi selekcyjnych - przegląd literatury i wstępne wyniki badania

  2019cites this paper
• Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes

  2019cites this paper
• The Use of Online Panel Data in Management Research: A Review and Recommendations:

  2019cites this paper
• Introducing and Testing the Creepiness of Situation Scale (CRoSS)

  2018cites this paper
• Assessing and Preventing Applicant Faking on Personality Tests

  2018cites this paper
• Information as a double-edged sword: The role of computer experience and information on applicant reactions towards novel technologies for personnel selection

  2018influential citation
• Examining Digital Interviews for Personnel Selection: Applicant Reactions and Interviewer Ratings

  2017cites this paper
• Personnel Assessment and Personnel Assessment and Decisions Decisions

  year unknowncites this paper