Over the past few decades, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support has extended the lives of many patients with end-stage heart failure. The most common devices are continuous-flow (CF) LVADs. The use of the CF-LVADs has required that clinicians learn the physiological and clinical consequences of long-term continuous blood flow. While this alteration in the normal physiology still offers advantages from mechanical circulatory support, the lack of pulsatility may also increase the likelihood of adverse events. However, it is currently unknown whether newly evolved devices should incorporate pulsatility. In this article, we discuss the possible benefits of incorporating pulsatility, while maintaining the benefits of the CF-LVAD, to maximize the treatment of patients.
The Physiological Rationale for Incorporating Pulsatility in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
L. Grosman-Rimon,F. Billia,J. Kobulnik,Stacey Pollock Bar-Ziv,D. Cherney,V. Rao
Published 2018 in Cardiology in Review
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
Cardiology in Review
- Publication date
2018-11-01
- Fields of study
Medicine, Engineering
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
CITED BY
Showing 1-11 of 11 citing papers · Page 1 of 1