Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary research evidence. We argue that systematic reviews and narrative reviews serve different purposes and should be viewed as complementary. Conventional systematic reviews address narrowly focused questions; their key contribution is summarising data. Narrative reviews provide interpretation and critique; their key contribution is deepening understanding. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?
T. Greenhalgh,S. Thorne,K. Malterud
Published 2018 in European Journal of Clinical Investigation
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Publication date
2018-04-16
- Fields of study
Medicine, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-50 of 50 references · Page 1 of 1