The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Story C. Landis,S. Amara,K. Asadullah,Chris P. Austin,R. Blumenstein,Eileen W. Bradley,R. Crystal,R. Darnell,R. Ferrante,H. Fillit,R. Finkelstein,M. Fisher,H. Gendelman,R. Golub,J. Goudreau,R. Gross,A. Gubitz,Sharon E. Hesterlee,D. Howells,J. Huguenard,Katrina L. Kelner,W. Koroshetz,D. Krainc,S. Lazic,M. S. Levine,M. Macleod,J. Mccall,R. Moxley,K. Narasimhan,L. Noble,S. Perrin,J. Porter,O. Steward,E. Unger,U. Utz,S. Silberberg
Published 2012 in Nature
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2012
- Venue
Nature
- Publication date
2012-10-10
- Fields of study
Medicine, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-75 of 75 references · Page 1 of 1