Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Resource and Energy Economics

• Publication date

  2014-08-01

• Fields of study

  Economics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.RESENEECO.2014.05.002
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Learning how to choose - effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments

  2015cited by this paper
• Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice experiment using respondents' own money

  2014cited by this paper
• Does it matter why power outages occur? An example of information-induced gender-heterogeneous preference on the intensive and extensive margins of choice

  2014cited by this paper
• Does gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments prevail among well-informed respondents: evidence from an empirical study

  2013cited by this paper
• Out Sight, Out of the Constrained Mind: Testing the Effect of a Cheap Talk in Choice Experiments

  2013cited by this paper
• The influence of cheap talk on willingness-to-pay ranges: some empirical evidence from a contingent valuation study

  2012cited by this paper
• Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Bias on the Intensive and Extensive Margins of Choice?

  2012cited by this paper
• The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments

  2012cited by this paper
• Can perceived task complexity influence cheap talk's effectiveness in reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice studies?

  2012cited by this paper
• Effects of third-party information on the demand for more sustainable consumption: A choice experiment on the transition of winter tourism

  2011cited by this paper
• Cheap Talk Scripts and Online Choice Experiments: “Looking Beyond the Mean”

  2011cited by this paper
• The Effect of Power Outages and Cheap Talk on Willingness to Pay to Reduce Outages

  2011cited by this paper
• A Test of Cheap Talk in Different Hypothetical Contexts: The Case of Air Pollution

  2011cited by this paper
• Does gender matter when using cheap talk in contingent valuation studies

  2010cited by this paper
• Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment

  2010cited by this paper
• Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods

  2010cited by this paper
• Documents de Travail du Centre d ’ Economie de la Sorbonne Social psychology and environmental economics : a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation

  2010cited by this paper
• Testing for Hypothetical Bias in a Choice Experiment Using a Local Public Good: Riparian Forest Restoration

  2010cited by this paper
• Exchange Rules and the Incentive Compatibility of Choice Experiments

  2010cited by this paper
• Do you do what you say or do you do what you say others do

  2010cited by this paper
• Reducing Status Quo Bias in Choice Experiments - An Application of a Protest Reduction Entreaty

  2010cited by this paper
• Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments

  2010cited by this paper
• A penny for your thoughts: Inducing truth-telling in stated preference elicitation

  2010cited by this paper
• Reducing Protest Zero Bias in Stated Preference Surveys - Testing a Protest Reduction Entreaty in a Health Economic Choice Experiment

  2009cited by this paper
• Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care.

  2009cited by this paper
• Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity

  2009cited by this paper
• What Motivates Common Pool Resource Users? Experimental Evidence from the Field

  2009cited by this paper
• A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods

  2009cited by this paper
• Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change

  2009cited by this paper
• Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies

  2009cited by this paper
• Hurdle and Latent Class Approaches to Serial Non-Participation in Choice Models

  2009cited by this paper
• The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions

  2008cited by this paper
• How is Donation Behaviour Affected by the Donations of Others

  2008cited by this paper
• The role of attribute processing strategies in estimating the preferences of road freight stakeholders

  2008cited by this paper
• Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods

  2008cited by this paper
• Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness

  2008cited by this paper
• Social Networks, Self Denial, and Median Preferences: Conformity as an Evolutionary Strategy

  2008cited by this paper
• Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica

  2008influential reference
• Using Flexible Taste Distributions to Value Collective Reputation for Environmentally Friendly Production Methods

  2008influential reference
• Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study

  2008influential reference
• Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment

  2008cited by this paper
• Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments

  2007cited by this paper
• Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit

  2007cited by this paper
• Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Derive Individual-Specific WTP Estimates for Landscape Improvements under Agri-Environmental Schemes: Evidence from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland

  2006cited by this paper
• Cheap Talk Reconsidered: New Evidence From CVM

  2006cited by this paper
• Ajae Appendix: Consumers’ Willingness To Pay For The Color Of Salmon: A Choice Experiment With Real Economic Incentives

  2006cited by this paper
• Using Choice Experiments to Value Non-Market Goods and Services: Evidence from Field Experiments

  2006influential reference
• Do Experience and Cheap Talk influence Willingness to Pay in an Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey?

  2006cited by this paper
• The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons.

  2006cited by this paper
• The Impact of Social Comparisons on Nonprofit Fund Raising

  2006cited by this paper
• Measuring Welfare Effects in Models with Random Coefficients

  2006cited by this paper
• Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?

  2006cited by this paper
• How and How Much

  2006cited by this paper
• Willingness to Pay for Reduced Risk of Foodborne Illness: A Nonhypothetical Field Experiment

  2006cited by this paper
• Modeling Disinterest and Dislike: A Bounded Bayesian Mixed Logit Model of the UK Market for GM Food

  2006cited by this paper
• How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load

  2006influential reference
• Field experiments in charitable contribution: The impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods

  2006cited by this paper
• Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments

  2005influential reference
• Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments

  2005cited by this paper
• The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values : Evidence from a field study

  2005cited by this paper
• Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism?

  2005cited by this paper
• Mixed Logit with Bounded Distributions of Correlated Partworths

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates

  2005cited by this paper
• Serial Nonparticipation in Repeated Discrete Choice Models

  2005cited by this paper
• Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space

  2005cited by this paper
• A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation

  2005cited by this paper
• Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer

  2005cited by this paper
• ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS

  2005cited by this paper
• None-of-These Bias in Stated Choice Experiments

  2005cited by this paper
• Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory.

  2004cited by this paper
• Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment

  2004cited by this paper
• Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks

  2004cited by this paper
• In a field experiment

  2004cited by this paper
• Learning Effects in Repeated Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions

  2004cited by this paper
• Assessing the impacts of alternative 'Opt-out' formats in choice experiment studies: Consumer preferences for genetically modified content and production information in food

  2003cited by this paper
• The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice

  2003influential reference
• Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Golden Rice

  2003cited by this paper
• Contingent Valuation in Practice

  2003cited by this paper
• Does market experience eliminate market anomalies

  2003cited by this paper
• Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments

  2003influential reference
• Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland

  2003cited by this paper
• A Comparison of Cheap Talk and Alternative Certainty Calibration Techniques in Contingent Valuation

  2003cited by this paper
• Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation by Kenneth E. Train

  2003influential reference
• Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation

  2003cited by this paper
• Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency

  2002cited by this paper
• Estimating Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias

  2002cited by this paper
• Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries

  2001cited by this paper
• What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?

  2001cited by this paper
• Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment

  2001cited by this paper
• Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards

  2001influential reference
• Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice

  2001cited by this paper
• Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications

  2000influential reference
• Stated Choice Methods: Relaxing the IID assumption – introducing variants of the MNL model

  2000influential reference
• Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method

  1999influential reference
• Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level

  1998cited by this paper
• Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment

  1998cited by this paper
• THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE-RESPONSE CV DATA

  1996cited by this paper
• Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments versus Contingent Valuation

  1995influential reference
• Decision Making When Choices Are Complex: A Test of Heiner's Hypothesis

  1995cited by this paper
• Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation

  1994cited by this paper

• Tapping more trees less often or fewer trees more often? Evaluating choices for forest resources governance.

  2026cites this paper
• Small steps in the right direction: Preferences of small-scale farmers for sustainable cattle systems in Guaviare, Colombian Amazon

  2026cites this paper
• Farmers’ preferences and willingness to accept incentives for adopting sustainable agricultural practices in India

  2026cites this paper
• Who should control the provider of ecosystem services in buyer-driven governance? A choice experiment on orchards in Germany

  2025cites this paper
• Information Videos Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in Discrete Choice Experiments

  2025cites this paper
• What are Canadians willing to pay for bird habitat conservation? A contingent valuation approach

  2025cites this paper
• Cost vector effects in forced-choice discrete choice experiments: Assessing the acceptability of future glyphosate policies

  2025cites this paper
• Assessing individual and social values of cultural services of a protected area through online deliberation

  2025cites this paper
• Healthy but also traceable: consumer choices for traits of food waste-reducing innovations

  2025cites this paper
• Mitigating cost vector effects in stated choice experiments using cheap talk and opt-out reminders

  2024cites this paper
• The invisible risks of the trans-Ecuadorian oil pipeline system: An analysis of social preferences in Quito

  2024cites this paper
• Who values urban community gardens and how much?

  2024cites this paper
• Enhancing the face validity of choice experiments: A simple diagnostic check

  2024cites this paper
• Putting a New ‘Spin’ on Energy Information: Measuring the Impact of Reframing Energy Efficiency Information on Tumble Dryer Choices in a Multi-country Experiment

  2024cites this paper
• The Value of National Defense: Assessing Public Preferences for Defense Policy Options

  2024cites this paper
• On the impact of decision rule assumptions in experimental designs on preference recovery: An application to climate change adaptation measures

  2024cites this paper
• High Public Good Values for Ecosystem Service Attributes of on-farm Quinoa Diversity Conservation in Peru

  2024cites this paper
• Factors affecting Missouri land managers’ willingness-to-adopt agroforestry practices

  2024cites this paper
• Public demand for carbon capture and storage varies with information, development magnitude and prior familiarity

  2024cites this paper
• From Niche to Mainstream: US Consumer Trends and Preferences for Elderberry Products

  2024cites this paper
• The country-of-origin dilemma: domestic bias or need for transparency? Assessing consumer’s value of information for country-of-origin labelling in Italy

  2024cites this paper
• Do consumers care about organic when consuming speciality bakery products or is it all about indulgence?

  2024cites this paper
• Distance to offshore wind farms, onshore wind power spillover relationships, and the willingness to pay for farshore, large-scale wind power development

  2024cites this paper
• Agro-input dealers' perspectives on the design of a certification scheme for pesticide risk reduction.

  2024cites this paper
• What does it take to revolutionize Chinese diets: evidence from a choice experiment on urban Chinese consumers

  2024cites this paper
• Reshaping Preferences Over Coastal and Marine Environment Evaluating Temporal Effects on Preferences Raised by Information Campaigns

  2023cites this paper
• An attempt to decrease social desirability bias: the effect of cheap talk mitigation on internal and external validity of discrete choice experiments

  2023cites this paper
• Early Exposure to Nature and Willingness to Pay for It: The Value of Tallgrass Prairie Grassland Restoration

  2023cites this paper
• Analysis of Pig Farmers’ Preference and Adoption Behavior for Food Safety Information Labels in China

  2023cites this paper
• Nexus between land development and the value of ecosystem services in Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study

  2023cites this paper
• Scotland ' s Rural College The relative performance of ex-ante and ex-post measures to mitigate hypothetical and strategic bias in a stated preference

  2022cites this paper
• The relative performance of ex‐ante and ex‐post measures to mitigate hypothetical and strategic bias in a stated preference study

  2022cites this paper
• Distance and Regional Effects on the Value of Wild Bee Conservation

  2022cites this paper
• The future adoption of community shared solar: An unlabeled choice experiment in Guangdong, China

  2022cites this paper
• Modeling farmers' preference and willingness to pay for improved climate services in Rwanda

  2022cites this paper
• Trust in the publicly financed care system and willingness to pay for long-term care: A discrete choice experiment in Denmark.

  2022cites this paper
• Understanding Farmers’ Preferences Towards Insurance Schemes that Promote Biosecurity Best Management Practices

  2022cites this paper
• Environmental information disclosure and public choice decisions for urban river restoration: A comparative study between Brussels (Belgium) and Guangzhou (China).

  2022cites this paper
• Exploring science park location choice: A stated choice experiment among Dutch technology-based firms

  2022cites this paper
• Information, Consequentiality and Credibility in Stated Preference Surveys: A Choice Experiment on Climate Adaptation

  2022cites this paper
• Heterogeneity in willingness to pay for the location of offshore wind power development: An application of the willingness to pay space model

  2021cites this paper
• Household preferences for load restrictions: Is there an effect of pro-environmental framing?

  2021cites this paper
• Mitigating hypothetical bias by defaulting to opt-out in an online choice

  2021cites this paper
• Does the origin of inputs and processing matter? Evidence from consumers’ valuation for craft beer

  2021cites this paper
• COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics

  2021cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity

  2021cites this paper
• Eliciting farmers’ preferences and willingness to pay for land use attributes in Northwest Ethiopia: A discrete choice experiment study

  2021cites this paper
• The opportunity cost of delaying climate action: Peatland restoration and resilience to climate change

  2021cites this paper
• Preferences for tree fruit market attributes among smallholder farmers in Eastern Rwanda

  2021cites this paper
• The heterogeneity of residents’ preference over a wide array of services, provided by a master planned community (MPC)

  2021cites this paper
• Farmer preferences for adopting drought-tolerant maize varieties: evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria

  2021cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods

  2021cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging

  2021cites this paper
• Identifying Roles for Public Administrators to Foster Anticipatory Altruism for Severe Weather Preparedness

  2021cites this paper
• Videos Improve Attention and Cheap Talk in Online Surveys

  2021cites this paper
• Preferences for coastal adaptation to climate change: evidence from a choice experiment

  2020cites this paper
• Developing the Questionnaire

  2020cites this paper
• Overlooked Benefits of Nutrient Reductions in the Mississippi River Basin

  2020cites this paper
• Citizens' preferences for research programs on forest genetic resources: A case applied to Pinus pinaster Ait. in Spain

  2020cites this paper
• Octopus’s garden under the blade: Boosting biodiversity increases willingness to pay for offshore wind in the United States

  2020cites this paper
• Public preferences for ecological indicators used in Everglades restoration

  2020cites this paper
• Demand-driven solutions to reduce aggression between pigs

  2020cites this paper
• Willingness to pay for long-term home care services: Evidence from a stated preferences analysis

  2020cites this paper
• Trading off positive and negative service changes in childcare: a choice experiment using a latent class modelling approach

  2020cites this paper
• Assessing the value of surface water and groundwater quality improvements when time lags and outcome uncertainty exist Results from a choice experiment survey across four different countries

  2020cites this paper
• How Consumers in the UK and Spain Value the Coexistence of the Claims Low Fat, Local, Organic and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions

  2020influential citation
• Public preferences for co-benefits of riparian buffer strips in Denmark: An economic valuation study.

  2019cites this paper
• Untangling perceptions around indicators for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services

  2019cites this paper
• Preferences for environmental quality across the rural-urban divide

  2019cites this paper
• Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs

  2019cites this paper
• Price Elasticity of Bushmeat Demand in the Greater Serengeti Ecosystem: Insights for Managing the Bushmeat Trade

  2019cites this paper
• Consumer Preferences for ‘Localness’ and Organic Food Production

  2019cites this paper
• Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual Hypothetical Bias: A meta-analysis

  2019cites this paper
• The preference for sustainable coffee and a new approach for dealing with hypothetical bias

  2019cites this paper
• Constraints to adopting soil fertility management practices in Malawi: A choice experiment approach

  2019cites this paper
• A web survey application of real choice experiments

  2019cites this paper
• Economic Incentives to Strengthen Ecosystem Connectivity in a Central Sumatran Agricultural Landscape

  2019cites this paper
• Local Benefits and Willingness to Pay to Reduce Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico

  2019cites this paper
• Consumer preference for infant milk-based formula with select food safety information attributes: Evidence from a choice experiment in China

  2018cites this paper
• Inducing value and institutional learning effects in stated choice experiments using advanced disclosure and instructional choice set treatments

  2018cites this paper
• Public preferences for biomass electricity in China

  2018cites this paper
• Hypothetical bias and decision-rule effect in modelling discrete directional choices

  2018cites this paper
• Public willingness to pay for improvements in ecosystem services and landowner willingness to accept for wetlands conservation: An assessment of benefit transfer validity and reliability using choice experiments in several Canadian watersheds

  2018cites this paper
• Can cheap talk scripts in combination with opt-out reminders nail down fat yes-tails in choice experiments ?

  2018cites this paper
• Mitigating strategic misrepresentation of values in open-ended stated preference surveys by using negative reinforcement

  2018cites this paper
• Landowner preferences for wetlands conservation programs in two Southern Ontario watersheds.

  2017cites this paper
• Divergence in stakeholders' preferences: Evidence from a choice experiment on forest landscapes preferences in Sweden

  2017cites this paper
• The landscape of olive groves as a driver of the rural economy

  2017cites this paper
• Payments for ecosystem services and agricultural intensification: Evidence from a choice experiment on deforestation in Zambia

  2017cites this paper
• Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products

  2017influential citation
• Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Techniques in Choice Experiments: Do Cheap Talk and Honesty Priming Effects Fade with Repeated Choices?

  2017cites this paper
• What do trout eat: Acceptance of insects in animal feed∗

  2017cites this paper
• Testing spatial preferences response patterns in Choice experiments: A comparison between Cheap Talk, Opt-Out Reminder and a control group

  2016cites this paper
• Reconciling Global and Local Benefits from Communally Managed Forests: Evidence from a Choice Experiment on PES in Zambia

  2016cites this paper
• A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods.

  2016cites this paper
• On a way to overcome strategic overbidding in open-ended stated preference surveys: A recoding approach

  2016cites this paper
• Spatial preferences in a choice experiment Visual impact of offshore wind turbines as a case

  2016cites this paper
• Is Willingness to Pay for Visualised Landscape Amenities Sensitive to Screen Size When Using Web Surveys

  2015cites this paper
• Willingness to pay for threatened and endangered marine species: a review of the literature and prospects for policy use

  2015cites this paper
• Hypothetical Bias Mitigation in Choice Experiments: Effectiveness of Cheap Talk and Honesty Priming Fade with Repeated Choices

  2015cites this paper