ABSTRACT Science is often romanticised as a flawless system of knowledge building, where scientists work together to systematically find answers. In reality, this is not always the case. Dissemination of results are straightforward when the findings are positive, but what happens when you obtain results that support the null hypothesis, or do not fit with the current scientific thinking? In this Editorial, we discuss the issues surrounding publication bias and the difficulty in communicating negative results. Negative findings are a valuable component of the scientific literature because they force us to critically evaluate and validate our current thinking, and fundamentally move us towards unabridged science.
Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture
Natalie Matosin,E. Frank,Martin Engel,Jeremy S. Lum,Kelly A. Newell
Published 2014 in Disease Models & Mechanisms
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2014
- Venue
Disease Models & Mechanisms
- Publication date
2014-02-01
- Fields of study
Sociology, Medicine, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-20 of 20 references · Page 1 of 1