SCIENCE@home

Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.

S. Regenbogen,Jesse M. Ehrenfeld,S. Lipsitz,C. Greenberg,M. Hutter,A. Gawande

Published 2009 in Archives of Surgery

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES To confirm the utility of a 10-point Surgical Apgar Score to rate surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients. DESIGN Using electronic intraoperative records, we calculated Surgical Apgar Scores during a period of 2 years (July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2005). SETTING Major academic medical center. PATIENTS Systematic sample of 4119 general and vascular surgery patients enrolled in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical outcomes database at a major academic medical center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incidence of major postoperative complications and/or death within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS Of 1441 patients with scores of 9 to 10, 72 (5.0%) developed major complications within 30 days, including 2 deaths (0.1%). By comparison, among 128 patients with scores of 4 or less, 72 developed major complications (56.3%; relative risk, 11.3; 95% confidence interval, 8.6-14.8; P < .001), of whom 25 died (19.5%; relative risk, 140.7; 95% confidence interval, 33.7-587.4; P < .001). The 3-variable score achieves C statistics of 0.73 for major complications and 0.81 for deaths. CONCLUSIONS The Surgical Apgar Score provides a simple, immediate, objective means of measuring and communicating patient outcomes in surgery, using data routinely available in any setting. The score can be effective in identifying patients at higher- and lower-than-average likelihood of major complications and/or death after surgery and may be useful for evaluating interventions to prevent poor outcomes.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-32 of 32 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-100 of 179 citing papers · Page 1 of 2

12
Next