Environmental problems are usually framed by a repertoire of arguments articulated by a network of individuals (scientists and policymakers) and their affiliated institutions. Given the complexity of this network, it is important to conduct network analyses on both individual and organizational levels to achieve a better understanding of the underlying political structure that influences science-policy communication. Through an empirical study of a policy network related to grassland management in China, our study examines the underlying political structure of the network as well as its political impact on the problem-framing processes. The analysis reveals that political polarization and power imbalances in the network, the product of existing institutional arrangements, have confined the framing of environmental problems to specific areas and impeded the development of comprehensive policies.
Polarization and clustering in scientific debates and problem framing: network analysis of the science-policy interface for grassland management in China
Published 2017 in Ecology and Society
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
Ecology and Society
- Publication date
2017-08-01
- Fields of study
Political Science, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-44 of 44 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-35 of 35 citing papers · Page 1 of 1