Family Physicians’ Awareness and Knowledge of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA)

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Journal of Genetic Counseling

• Publication date

  2012-04-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10897-011-9405-6PMID 21927977
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Consumers’ Use of Web-Based Information and Their Decisions About Multiplex Genetic Susceptibility Testing

  2010cited by this paper
• Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

  2010cited by this paper
• A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing

  2010cited by this paper
• Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers

  2010cited by this paper
• Health Insurance and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008: Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice

  2009cited by this paper
• Behind the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008.

  2009cited by this paper
• Beyond GINA

  2008cited by this paper
• Keeping pace with the times--the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008.

  2008influential reference
• Civilian and military genetics: nondiscrimination policy in a post-GINA world.

  2008cited by this paper
• Influence of genetic discrimination perceptions and knowledge on cancer genetics referral practice among clinicians

  2008influential reference
• Currents in Contemporary Ethics is GINA Worth the Wait?

  2008cited by this paper
• The new genetic privacy law

  2008cited by this paper
• Recording, using and sharing genetic information and test results: consent is the key in all medical specialties.

  2006cited by this paper
• Concerns in a primary care population about genetic discrimination by insurers

  2005cited by this paper
• Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: A global problem

  2005cited by this paper
• Genetic discrimination: the clinician perspective

  2004cited by this paper
• An Investigation of Genetic Counselors' Discussions of Genetic Discrimination with Cancer Risk Patients

  2003cited by this paper
• Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy: limited alertness and awareness about genetic risk factors among GPs.

  2003cited by this paper
• Genetic Information: Legal Issues Relating to Discrimination and Privacy

  2001cited by this paper
• Patients' fear of genetic discrimination by health insurers: the impact of legal protections

  2000cited by this paper
• What would you do? Specialists' perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination.

  2000cited by this paper
• Efforts to regulate the collection and use of genetic information.

  1999cited by this paper
• Genetic test information fears unfounded.

  1999cited by this paper
• Inducing Immune Tolerance

  1999cited by this paper
• Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services

  1998cited by this paper
• Genetic Discrimination: Perspectives of Consumers

  1996cited by this paper
• Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing.

  1992influential reference

• Revolutionising Cardio-Oncology Care with Precision Genomics

  2025cites this paper
• Shifting ownership, shifting protections: Patient privacy and genetic data ownership in the era of mergers and acquisitions

  2025influential citation
• Australian researcher's perspectives on the Australian industry‐led moratorium on genetic tests in life insurance

  2024cites this paper
• The impact of genetic education on referral of patients to genetic evaluation: Findings from a national survey of nephrologists.

  2023cites this paper
• General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review

  2022cites this paper
• Parental Attitudes Toward Clinical Genomic Sequencing in Children With Critical Cardiac Disease

  2021cites this paper
• Points to consider to avoid unfair discrimination and the misuse of genetic information: A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

  2021cites this paper
• Genetic testing and insurance implications: Surveying the US general population about discrimination concerns and knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA).

  2021cites this paper
• The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage

  2021cites this paper
• A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium

  2021cites this paper
• User engagement with web-based genomics education videos and implications for designing scalable patient education materials

  2020cites this paper
• Genomic Basis of Psychiatric Illnesses and Response to Psychiatric Drug Treatment Modalities

  2020cites this paper
• The future of precision medicine

  2020cites this paper
• An update on genetic risk assessment and prevention: the role of genetic testing panels in breast cancer

  2019cites this paper
• Integrating Genomics into Psychiatric Practice: Ethical and Legal Challenges for Clinicians

  2019cites this paper
• The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: early & active training for physicians in the genomic medicine era.

  2018cites this paper
• A comparative study of patients’ perceptions of genetic and genomic medicine services in California and Malaysia

  2018cites this paper
• 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

  2018cites this paper
• Views Of Primary Care Providers On Testing Patients For Genetic Risks For Common Chronic Diseases.

  2018cites this paper
• Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium

  2018cites this paper
• 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

  2018cites this paper
• Shared decision making: Implications for return of results from whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing.

  2018cites this paper
• Empirical Validation of the Genetic Psychosocial Risk Instrument – French Version (GPRI-F)

  2018cites this paper
• Genomic Pathology: Training for New Technology

  2018cites this paper
• Impact of an educational program on recognition and management of Ventricular arrhythmias guideline among critical care nurses in Khartoum City, Sudan

  2018cites this paper
• Ethical Issues in Contemporary Clinical Genetics

  2018cites this paper
• Overview of Policy, Ethical, and Social Considerations in Genomic and Personalized Medicine

  2017cites this paper
• Awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic testing for cancer risk among ethnic minority groups: a systematic review

  2017cites this paper
• Genomic translational research: Paving the way to individualized cardiac functional analyses and personalized cardiology.

  2017cites this paper
• Genetic Evaluation for Women at Increased Risk

  2017cites this paper
• 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

  2017cites this paper
• Genetics, Disability and the Law: Towards an EU Legal Framework

  2017cites this paper
• Managing BRCA Mutation Carriers

  2017cites this paper
• Precision Medicine and Challenges in Research and Clinical Implementation

  2017cites this paper
• Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?

  2016cites this paper
• Pharmacogenetics in Cardiovascular Medicine

  2016cites this paper
• Assessing Awareness of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) among Nurse Practitioners

  2016cites this paper
• Exploring Barriers to the Adoption of Pharmacogenomic Technology in the Clinical Setting by Clinical Healthcare Providers

  2016cites this paper
• Genetic Counseling and Risk Assessment

  2016cites this paper
• A Comparison of Perceived Barriers to Healthcare between Malaysian and Californian Patients with Rare Disease

  2016cites this paper
• Precision Medicine and Advancing Genetic Technologies—Disability and Human Rights Perspectives

  2016cites this paper
• Next-generation sequencing for hereditary breast and gynecologic cancer risk assessment

  2015cites this paper
• Implications for Health and Life Insurances and Other Legal Aspects of Genetic Testing

  2015cites this paper
• The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA): What They Mean for Breast Cancer Patients and Their Families

  2015cites this paper
• Military Health Care Dilemmas and Genetic Discrimination: A Family’s Experience with Whole Exome Sequencing

  2015cites this paper
• Confidentiality & the Risk of Genetic Discrimination: What Surgeons Need to Know.

  2015cites this paper
• Identification of Low‐Risk Adult Congenital LQTS Patients

  2015cites this paper
• Public Awareness of Genetic Nondiscrimination Laws in Four States and Perceived Importance of Life Insurance Protections

  2015cites this paper
• Decision aids help patients but still are not widely used.

  2014cites this paper
• The Critical Challenge of Educating the Public About Genetics

  2014cites this paper
• Genetic Information, Non-Discrimination, and Privacy Protections in Genetic Counseling Practice

  2014influential citation
• Sharing Genetic Information Online: An Exploration of GINA's 2.0 Frontier

  2014cites this paper
• “Would you test your children without their consent?” and other sticky dilemmas in the field of cancer genetic testing

  2014influential citation
• Genomic oncology education: an urgent need, a new approach.

  2014cites this paper
• Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature

  2014cites this paper
• Universal Tumor Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Identification of system-level implementation factors influencing patient reach

  2013cites this paper
• La pharmacothérapie personnalisée et la pharmacogénétique

  2013cites this paper
• Awareness of the US Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008: an online survey

  2013influential citation
• Getting the Word Out on GINA

  2013cites this paper
• Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

  2013cites this paper
• Public Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing

  2013cites this paper
• Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy.

  2013cites this paper
• eCHAT for Lifestyle and Mental Health Screening in Primary Care

  2013cites this paper
• Investigations and thoughts of the ethics in genetic discrimination

  2013cites this paper
• Preparing for Personalized Medicine in Massachusetts Enhancing

  2013cites this paper
• Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians.

  2012cites this paper
• Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

  2012cites this paper
• Personalized medicine approach in mycobacterial disease.

  2012influential citation
• Adverse Events in Cancer Genetic Testing: Medical, Ethical, Legal, and Financial Implications

  2012cites this paper
• Practical considerations to guide development of access controls and decision support for genetic information in electronic medical records

  2011cites this paper
• Veterans' experience in using the online Surgeon General's family health history tool.

  2011cites this paper
• Utilization of conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease

  2011cites this paper
• Genetic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Informed Consent Understanding: A Study of Parents of Pediatric Patients With Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Malformations

  2011cites this paper
• Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and Its Affect on Genetic Counseling Practice: A Survey of Genetic Counselors

  2011cites this paper
• ACMG STATEMENT Points to consider to avoid unfair discrimination and the misuse of genetic information: A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

  year unknowncites this paper