A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Medical Law Review

• Publication date

  2013-03-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Business

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1093/medlaw/fws040PMID 23325780
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets

  2012cited by this paper
• Solidarity in contemporary bioethics--towards a new approach.

  2012cited by this paper
• From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research

  2012cited by this paper
• Personal privacy, public benefits, and biobanks: a conjoint analysis of policy priorities and public perceptions

  2011cited by this paper
• Active choice but not too active: Public perspectives on biobank consent models

  2011cited by this paper
• Using electronic health records to drive discovery in disease genomics

  2011cited by this paper
• Biomarkers: better donor protection

  2011cited by this paper
• Reflexive governance in biobanking: on the value of policy led approaches and the need to recognise the limits of law

  2011cited by this paper
• Research ethics: Treat donors as partners in biobank research

  2011cited by this paper
• Viewpoint: How to avoid a dichotomy between autonomy and beneficence: from liberalism to communitarianism and beyond

  2011cited by this paper
• Consensus and controversies in best practices for molecular genetic testing of spinocerebellar ataxias

  2010cited by this paper
• Sustainable digital infrastructure

  2010cited by this paper
• Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.

  2010cited by this paper
• Semantic, pedantic or paradigm shift? Recruitment, retention and property in modern population biobanking.

  2009cited by this paper
• Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?

  2009cited by this paper
• What are the stakes? Genetic nondiscrimination legislation and personal genomics.

  2008cited by this paper
• Personal Genomes: When consent gets in the way

  2008cited by this paper
• From genetic privacy to open consent

  2008cited by this paper
• The Ethics of Research Biobanking: A Critical Review of the Literature

  2008cited by this paper
• Is respect for autonomy defensible?

  2007cited by this paper
• Tackling community concerns about commercialisation and genetic research: a modest interdisciplinary proposal.

  2007cited by this paper
• Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks

  2006cited by this paper
• The Flesh Made Word: Banking the Body in the Age of Information

  2006cited by this paper
• Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?

  2006cited by this paper
• Precaution and Solidarity

  2005cited by this paper
• Solidarity, Society and the Welfare State in the United Kingdom

  2004cited by this paper
• Lifestyle Solidarity in the Healthcare System

  2004cited by this paper
• Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent

  2004cited by this paper
• Some limits of informed consent

  2003cited by this paper
• Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases

  2001cited by this paper
• The impact of German health insurance reforms on redistribution and the culture of solidarity.

  1995cited by this paper

• Dispersed HLA variability and the making of solidarity in umbilical cord blood collection in Italy

  2026cites this paper
• Reconceptualizing the right to withdraw in stem cell research: Striking a balance between donor autonomy and scientific utility

  2026cites this paper
• Tendencias, perspectivas y desafíos de la gobernanza en salud. Un análisis bibliométrico

  2025cites this paper
• Storing Life in Public Hands: The Problem of Unfulfilled Mobiles in Biobanking

  2025cites this paper
• “It has to somehow permeate to the public”: expert views on the solidaristic potential of Israel’s National genomic biobank initiative

  2025cites this paper
• Conflicts and complexities around intellectual property and value sharing of artificial intelligence healthcare solutions in public-private partnerships: A qualitative study

  2025cites this paper
• A scoping review of ethical aspects of public-private partnerships in digital health

  2025cites this paper
• Technologies Do Not Build Trust, People Do: A Critical Response to Promises of Trust in Biobanking Through Blockchain and Generative AI

  2025cites this paper
• Knowledge and Recommendations of Stakeholders Regarding Ethical Oversight of Data Science Health Research: Protocol for a Qualitative Study

  2025cites this paper
• Community engagement conduct for genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders in Uganda

  2024cites this paper
• Public Perspectives on Consent for and Governance of Biobanking in Japan

  2024cites this paper
• A contextual integrity approach to genomic information: what bioethics can learn from big data ethics

  2024cites this paper
• A pathway to strengthening open science: comments on the draft South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines

  2024cites this paper
• Neuroimaging data repositories and AI-driven healthcare—Global aspirations vs. ethical considerations in machine learning models of neurological disease

  2024cites this paper
• Ethical and social reflections on the proposed European Health Data Space

  2024cites this paper
• Dynamic consent, communication and return of results in large-scale health data reuse: Survey of public preferences

  2023cites this paper
• How to Design Consent for Health Data Research? An Analysis of Arguments of Solidarity

  2023cites this paper
• Stop agonising over informed consent when researchers use crowdsourcing platforms to conduct survey research

  2023cites this paper
• Ethical considerations surrounding health-related big data research.

  2023cites this paper
• Precision Medicine for Whom? Public Health Outputs from “Genomics England” and “All of Us” to Make Up for Upstream and Downstream Exclusion

  2023cites this paper
• Health data governance in China: Emphasizing ‘sharing’ and ‘protection’ based on the right to health

  2022cites this paper
• Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language

  2022cites this paper
• Organoid biobanking, autonomy and the limits of consent

  2022cites this paper
• Toward a reciprocity-based relational autonomy for population biobanks: advantages and limitations

  2022cites this paper
• Characteristics of population biobanks

  2022cites this paper
• Is there a civic duty to support medical AI development by sharing electronic health records?

  2022cites this paper
• Best Practice in Multi-organisation Sensitive Health Data Sharing: A Comparative Analysis of Ireland's Data Governance Approach for the Covid-19 Data Research Hub

  2022cites this paper
• Trust and Trade-Offs in Sharing Data for Precision Medicine: A National Survey of Singapore

  2021cites this paper
• Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review

  2021cites this paper
• Mini-gut feelings: perspectives of people with cystic fibrosis on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking.

  2021cites this paper
• Genomics governance: advancing justice, fairness and equity through the lens of the African communitarian ethic of Ubuntu

  2021cites this paper
• Biobanking and risk assessment: a comprehensive typology of risks for an adaptive risk governance

  2021cites this paper
• Zwischen neuer Solidarität und Entsolidarisierung – Der Sozialstaat angesichts des digitalen Wandels

  2021cites this paper
• From the UK Welfare State to Digital Self-Care: Historical Context of Tracking Public Health and Quantifying Bodies

  2021cites this paper
• Die ethische Aufsicht über die Datenwissenschaft im Gesundheitswesen

  2021cites this paper
• Population Branding as Practices of Valuation

  2021cites this paper
• What does engagement mean to participants in longitudinal cohort studies? A qualitative study

  2021cites this paper
• Organoids for personalized treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: Professional perspectives on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking.

  2020cites this paper
• Reporting of secondary findings in genomic research: Stakeholders’ attitudes and preferences

  2020cites this paper
• COVID-19: Putting the GDPR to the test.

  2020cites this paper
• Ethische Analyse der klinischen Forschung mit humanen induzierten pluripotenten Stammzellen

  2020cites this paper
• Data Mining in Systems Medicine and the Project of Solidarity: The Interface of Genomics and Society Revisited

  2020cites this paper
• Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?

  2020cites this paper
• Return of Results in Population Studies: How Do Participants Perceive Them?

  2020cites this paper
• Problematizing consent: searching genetic genealogy databases for law enforcement purposes

  2020cites this paper
• COVID-19: Putting the General Data Protection Regulation to the Test

  2020cites this paper
• Trust and Justice in Big Data Analytics: Bringing the Philosophical Literature on Trust to Bear on the Ethics of Consent

  2019cites this paper
• Personalized Psychiatry

  2019cites this paper
• Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms

  2019cites this paper
• Informed Consent in Biomedical Research

  2019cites this paper
• Logged out: Ownership, exclusion and public value in the digital data and information commons

  2019cites this paper
• Ethics in the Era of Big Data

  2019cites this paper
• Facial recognition from DNA using face-to-DNA classifiers

  2019cites this paper
• Body data — data body : Tracing ambiguous trajectories of data bodies between empowerment and social control in the context of health

  2019cites this paper
• Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis

  2019cites this paper
• Patient attitudes towards faecal sampling for gut microbiome studies and clinical care reveal positive engagement and room for improvement

  2019cites this paper
• Relative solidarity: Conceptualising communal participation in genomic research among potential research participants in a developing Sub-Saharan African setting

  2018cites this paper
• The Digital Phenotype: a Philosophical and Ethical Exploration

  2018cites this paper
• Responsible regulation in action? Responsible research and innovation and the European Bank for induced pluripotent stem cells

  2018cites this paper
• The “We” in the “Me”

  2018cites this paper
• Big Data in Healthcare and the Life Sciences

  2018cites this paper
• Perspectives on Achieving Institutional Trust in Personalized Medicine

  2018cites this paper
• Is there a duty to participate in digital epidemiology?

  2018cites this paper
• Conceptual and Ethical Considerations for Citizen Science in Biomedicine

  2018cites this paper
• Ethical aspects of sudden cardiac arrest research using observational data: a narrative review

  2018cites this paper
• Every participant is a PI. Citizen science and participatory governance in population studies.

  2017cites this paper
• Motivations of participants in the citizen science of microbiomics: data from the British Gut Project

  2017cites this paper
• Trust and Justice in Big Data Analytics: Bringing the Philosophical Literature on Trust to Bear on the Ethics of Consent

  2017influential citation
• EPIGENETICS AND POLICY: CROSS-LINKING THE 'ENVIRONMENTAL TURN' IN THE LIFE SCIENCES AND THE 'MOLECULAR TURN' IN EPIDEMIOLOGY

  2017cites this paper
• Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States

  2017cites this paper
• Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms – which values should be considered?

  2017cites this paper
• Cultural aspects related to informed consent in health research

  2016cites this paper
• Ethical Reuse of Data from Health Care: Data, Persons and Interests

  2016cites this paper
• Big Data Governance: Solidarity and the Patient Voice.

  2016cites this paper
• Improving the informed consent process in international collaborative rare disease research: effective consent for effective research

  2016cites this paper
• Critical analysis and comparison of data protection techniques for genomics data sets

  2016cites this paper
• Biobanking: Relational obligations.

  2016cites this paper
• Modernizing biomedical regulation: foresight and values in the promotion of responsible research and innovation

  2016cites this paper
• Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte

  2016cites this paper
• Thinking ethical and regulatory frameworks in medicine from the perspective of solidarity on both sides of the Atlantic

  2016cites this paper
• Beyond clinical utility: The multiple values of DTC genetics

  2016cites this paper
• Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?

  2015cites this paper
• The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts

  2015cites this paper
• Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach

  2015cites this paper
• Evaluating the Consent Preferences of UK Research Volunteers for Genetic and Clinical Studies

  2015cites this paper
• Fundamental principles of human biobankdevelopment

  2015cites this paper
• Governing the research-care divide in clinical biobanking: Dutch perspectives

  2015cites this paper
• Biobanking strategies and regulative approaches in the eU: recent perspectives

  2015cites this paper
• Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: Tactical engagements with genetic testing

  2015cites this paper
• Genetic research on biospecimens poses minimal risk.

  2015cites this paper
• Biobank consent models - are we moving toward increased participant engagement in biobanking?

  2015cites this paper
• Public participation in genetic databases: crossing the boundaries between biobanks and forensic DNA databases through the principle of solidarity

  2015cites this paper
• Challenges of web-based personal genomic data sharing

  2015cites this paper
• The EuroBioBank Network: 10 years of hands-on experience of collaborative, transnational biobanking for rare diseases

  2014cites this paper
• Redefining Genomic Privacy: Trust and Empowerment

  2014cites this paper
• Banking (on) the brain: from consent to authorisation and the transformative potential of solidarity.

  2014cites this paper
• Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: Tactical engagements with genetic testing

  2014cites this paper
• Solidarność we współczesnej bioetyce – klasyczne problemy, nowe wyzwania

  2014cites this paper
• DIY genetics: the right to know your own genome

  2014cites this paper
• Comparing Social Solidarity Across Historical Societies

  2014cites this paper