Do Patients' Evaluations of a Future Health State Change When They Actually Enter That State?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1993

• Venue

  Medical Care

• Publication date

  1993-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00003PMID 8231333
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Making Health Care Decisions

  1992cited by this paper
• Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation.

  1991cited by this paper
• Evaluating health related quality of life: an indifference curve interpretation for the time trade-off technique.

  1990cited by this paper
• Patients versus surrogates: whose opinion counts on ethics review panels?

  1989cited by this paper
• Patients versus surrogates: whose opinion counts on ethics review panels?

  1989cited by this paper
• Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life

  1989cited by this paper
• Measuring satisfaction with health care: a comparison of single with paired rating strategies.

  1989cited by this paper
• KNOWING WHAT YOU WANT: MEASURING LABILE VALUES

  1988cited by this paper
• Measuring the wellbeing of family caregivers using the time trade-off technique.

  1988cited by this paper
• Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences.

  1987cited by this paper
• Measurement of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach.

  1987cited by this paper
• Quality of life measurement in breast cancer patients.

  1985cited by this paper
• Should study subjects see their previous responses?

  1985cited by this paper
• Linear analogue self-assessment of voice quality in laryngeal cancer.

  1984cited by this paper
• The assessment of values in laryngeal cancer: reliability of measurement methods.

  1984cited by this paper
• The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

  1984cited by this paper
• Developing Multiattribute Health Indexes

  1984cited by this paper
• Describing Health States: Methodologic Issues in Obtaining Values for Health States

  1984cited by this paper
• Discount Functions and the Measurement of Patients' Values

  1984cited by this paper
• Quality of Life in End-Stage Renal Disease

  1984cited by this paper
• Measurement of Values for States of Health with Linear Analog Scales

  1983cited by this paper
• Cancer of the larynx--the Toronto experience.

  1982cited by this paper
• The Measurement of Patients' Values in Medicine

  1982cited by this paper
• Weight loss in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective study.

  1982cited by this paper
• Values and long-term care

  1982cited by this paper
• The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure

  1981cited by this paper
• Clinical Decision Analysis

  1980cited by this paper
• Radiotherapy of early glottic cancer

  1980cited by this paper
• Radiotherapy of early glottic cancer--I.

  1979cited by this paper
• A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus?

  1978cited by this paper
• The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public.

  1978cited by this paper
• Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques

  1976cited by this paper
• A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs.

  1972cited by this paper
• Hedonic relativism and planning the good society

  1971cited by this paper
• A study of self‐explicated utility models

  1970cited by this paper

• La perception du compromis survie/préservation laryngée dans les cancers du larynx de stade T avancé

  2023cites this paper
• Perception of survival/laryngeal preservation trade-off in advanced T-stage laryngeal cancer.

  2023cites this paper
• The QALY at 50: One story many voices.

  2021cites this paper
• Valuing Follow-up Programs In Head and Neck Cancer

  2018cites this paper
• Utility approach to decision‐making in extended T1 and limited T2 glottic carcinoma

  2017cites this paper
• A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer

  2017cites this paper
• Perceived health state and willingness to pay for outdoor recreation: an analysis of forest recreationists and hunters

  2016cites this paper
• Fluorouracil plasma monitoring: systematic review and economic evaluation of the My5-FU assay for guiding dose adjustment in patients receiving fluorouracil chemotherapy by continuous infusion.

  2015cites this paper
• Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications

  2015cites this paper
• Demographic Differences in Health Preferences in the United States

  2014cites this paper
• Moving toward patient-centered care: Women's decisions, perceptions, and experiences of the induction of labor process.

  2014cites this paper
• Decision Support for Patients

  2013cites this paper
• in the

  2013cites this paper
• Are patients' judgments of health status really different from the general population?

  2011cites this paper
• Explorations of the Effect of Experience on Preferences for a Health-Care Service

  2010cites this paper
• Influence of outdoor recreation on self-rated human health: comparing three categories of Swedish recreationists

  2010cites this paper
• Health state valuation methods and reference points: the case of tinnitus.

  2009cites this paper
• Thrombolytic treatment for stroke: patient preferences for treatment, information, and involvement.

  2009cites this paper
• Interpretations of Utility and Their Implications for the Valuation of Health

  2008cites this paper
• When should ulcerative colitis patients undergo colectomy for dysplasia? Mismatch between patient preferences and physician recommendations

  2008cites this paper
• MAKING DECISIONS IN ADVANCED CANCER: THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF WOMEN AND THEIR RELEVANT OTHERS

  2008cites this paper
• A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utilities

  2007cites this paper
• Eliciting Utilities Using Functional Methodology: People’s Disutilities for the Adverse Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

  2006cites this paper
• Preferences and Utilities of Health Outcomes and Treatments Associated with Head and Neck Cancer

  2006cites this paper
• Doing the right thing: Systems support for decision quality in cancer care

  2006cites this paper
• Understanding treatment decision making: Contexts, commonalities, complexities, and challenges

  2006cites this paper
• Being There Is Important, but Getting There Matters Too: The Role of Path in the Valuation Process

  2006cites this paper
• The Transient Nature of Utilities and Health Preferences

  2006cites this paper
• Misremembering colostomies? Former patients give lower utility ratings than do current patients.

  2006cites this paper
• Men considering a hypothetical treatment for prostate cancer: a comparison to patients.

  2006cites this paper
• OUTCOME MEASUREMENT THE TIME TRADE-OFF METHOD : RESULTS FROM A GENERAL POPULATION STUDY

  2006cites this paper
• Living wills and the Mental Capacity Act: a postal questionnaire survey of UK geriatricians.

  2006cites this paper
• Explorations of the Effect of Experience on Preferences: Two Health-Care Case Studies

  2006cites this paper
• Advance directives and cancer decision making near the end of life.

  2005cites this paper
• Imagining the End of Life: On the Psychology of Advance Medical Decision Making

  2005cites this paper
• Valuing the health state 'tinnitus': differences between patients and the general public.

  2005cites this paper
• Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire.

  2005cites this paper
• Hypothetical valuations of health states versus patients’ self-ratings

  2005cites this paper
• Health Values, Preference Inconsistency, and Insurance Demand

  2005cites this paper
• Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable?--A systematic review of TTO methodologies.

  2005cites this paper
• How Perceived Risk and Personal and Clinical Experience Affect Medical Students’ Decisions to Seek Treatment for Major Depression

  2004cites this paper
• Long term survival and costs per life year gained after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

  2004cites this paper
• Roughly right or precisely wrong? Systematic review of quality-of-life weights elicited with the time trade-off method

  2004cites this paper
• Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods

  2004cites this paper
• The stability of utility scores: Test–retest reliability and the interpretation of utility scores in elective total hip arthroplasty

  2004cites this paper
• A comparison of ovarian cancer treatments: analysis of utility assessments of ovarian cancer patients, at-risk population, general population, and physicians.

  2004cites this paper
• Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: The roles for preference-based measures in support of cancer research and policy

  2004cites this paper
• Quantifying trade-offs: quality of life and quality-adjusted survival in a randomised trial of chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer

  2004cites this paper
• The of Rheumatology questionnaire.Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment

  2004cites this paper
• Preferences For Prolonging Life: A Prospect Theory Approach

  2003cites this paper
• Measuring quality of life and utilities in esophageal cancer

  2003cites this paper
• Effect of Assessment Method on the Discrepancy between Judgments of Health Disorders People have and do not have: A Web Study

  2003cites this paper
• What Do Patients Want?

  2003cites this paper
• Self-Management Decision Influences in Heart Failure

  2003cites this paper
• PAPER STANDARD GAMBLE

  2003cites this paper
• Stability of maternal preferences for pediatric health states in the perinatal period and 1 year later.

  2003cites this paper
• Paper Standard Gamble: The Reliability of a Paper Questionnaire to Assess Utility

  2003cites this paper
• Health utility estimation

  2002cites this paper
• Predicting Elderly Outpatients’ Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Time: The Majority Rules

  2002cites this paper
• Primary Prevention Drug Therapy: Can It Meet Patients’ Requirements for Reduced Risk?

  2002cites this paper
• Stability of time trade-off utilities for health states associated with the treatment of prostate cancer

  2002cites this paper
• Quality of Life, Depression, and End-of-Life Attitudes and Behaviors

  2002cites this paper
• Whose Preferences – a Matter of Reference Points ?

  2002cites this paper
• Are preferences stable? The case of health care

  2002cites this paper
• Prospective preference assessment: a method to enhance the ethics and efficiency of randomized controlled trials.

  2002cites this paper
• Utilities Measured by Rating Scale, Time Trade-off, and Standard Gamble: Review and Reference for Health Care Professionals

  2002cites this paper
• Priorities and Prospect Theory

  2001cites this paper
• Quality-of-life outcomes in the evaluation of head and neck cancer treatments.

  2001cites this paper
• Empfehlungen zur einheitlichen Dokumentation nach schwerem Trauma - der Utstein-Style1

  2001cites this paper
• Predictors of utilities for health states in early stage prostate cancer.

  2001cites this paper
• Patient autonomy in emergency medicine

  2001cites this paper
• Representing Patient Preference-Related Concepts for Inclusion in Electronic Health Records

  2001influential citation
• Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation. an explorative investigation.

  2001cites this paper
• Who Will Enroll? Predicting Participation in a Phase II AIDS Vaccine Trial

  2001cites this paper
• Feasibility and Validity of the VAS and TTO for Eliciting General Population Values for Temporary Health States: A Comparative Study

  2001cites this paper
• Effect of experience of severe stroke on subjective valuations of quality of life after stroke

  2001cites this paper
• Stability of Patients’ Preferences for Chemotherapy

  2001cites this paper
• Patient Decision-making Behavior: An Emerging Paradigm for Nursing Science

  2001cites this paper
• Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approaches.

  2001cites this paper
• Community-Based Case Management: A Model for Outcome-Based Research for Non-Institutionalized Elderly

  2001cites this paper
• Can Utility-Weighted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Estimates Capture Health Effects of Quality Improvement for Depression?

  2001cites this paper
• “Death” and the Valuation of Health-Related Quality of Life

  2001cites this paper
• An Emerging Paradigm for Nursing Science

  2001cites this paper
• Who will enroll? Predicting participation in a phase II AIDS vaccine trial.

  2001cites this paper
• Parental Perspectives of the Health Status and Health-Related Quality of Life of Teen-Aged Children Who Were Extremely Low Birth Weight and Term Controls

  2000cites this paper
• [Recommendations for uniform documentation according to trauma severity--the Utstein style. An international initiative of the International Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care Society (ITACCS)].

  2000cites this paper
• Unstable Preferences:

  2000cites this paper
• Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: whose values count?

  2000cites this paper
• Empfehlungen zur einheitlichen Dokumentation nach schwerem Trauma – Der Utstein Style

  2000cites this paper
• Empfehlungen zur einheitlichen Dokumentation nach schwerem Trauma – Der Utstein Style Eine internationale Initiative der International Trauma Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society (ITACCS)

  2000cites this paper
• Quality of life and utility in irradiated laryngeal cancer patients.

  2000cites this paper
• Recommendations for uniform reporting of data following major trauma - the Utstein style

  2000cites this paper
• Exploring health preferences in sociodemographic and health related groups through the paired comparison of the items of the Nottingham Health Profile

  2000cites this paper
• Health Values and Prospect Theory

  1999cites this paper
• Telephone interviews vs. workstation sessions for acquiring quality of life data

  1999cites this paper
• Associations between health status and utilities implications for policy.

  1999cites this paper
• Recommendations for Uniform Reporting of Data following Major Trauma — The Utstein Style: An Initiative

  1999cites this paper
• Science, language, intuition, and the many meanings of quality of life.

  1999cites this paper
• Enduring pain for money: decisions based on the perception and memory of pain

  1999cites this paper
• Research Paper: Decision Support for Patient Preference-based Care Planning: Effects on Nursing Care and Patient Outcomes

  1999cites this paper