Have Referees Rejected Some of the Most-Cited Articles of All Times?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1996

• Venue

  Journal of the American Society for Information Science

• Publication date

  1996-04-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Computer Science, Education

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199604)47:4%3C302::AID-ASI6%3E3.0.CO;2-0
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Confusion on the cutting edge.

  1992cited by this paper
• The Skewness of Science

  1992cited by this paper
• Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?

  1991cited by this paper
• Research papers: who's uncited now?

  1991cited by this paper
• Publication bias in clinical research.

  1991cited by this paper
• The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation

  1991cited by this paper
• Are sociologists’ publications uncited? Citation rates of journal articles, chapters, and books

  1991cited by this paper
• Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals

  1990cited by this paper
• Publishing by--and for?--the numbers.

  1990cited by this paper
• The impact of peer review on intellectual freedom

  1990cited by this paper
• The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation.

  1990cited by this paper
• More Delayed Recognition. Part 2. From Inhibin to Scanning Electron Microscopy

  1990cited by this paper
• Social Networks of Science and Patterns of Publication in Leading Sociology Journals, 1960 to 1985

  1990cited by this paper
• Nobel Prize for Catalytic RNA Found Winners on Separate Tracks

  1989influential reference
• The 1988 Nobel Prize in Chemistry Goes to Joham Deisenhofer, Robert Huber, and Hartnmt Michel for Elucidating Photosynthetic Processes

  1989cited by this paper
• Reviewing the gatekeepers: A survey of referees of library journals

  1988cited by this paper
• Pathologies of science

  1987cited by this paper
• Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 1. Opfnion and Conjecture on the Effectiveness of Refereeing

  1986cited by this paper
• What is a Citation Worth

  1986cited by this paper
• The geography of science: disciplinary and national mappings

  1985cited by this paper
• Refinement in Biomedical Communication: A Case Study

  1985cited by this paper
• Enzyme kinetic constants: the double reciprocal plot

  1984cited by this paper
• "Citation classics" analysis: An approach to characterizing interdisciplinary research

  1984cited by this paper
• How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations and when is it relevant

  1983cited by this paper
• The 1983 nobel prize in chemistry.

  1983cited by this paper
• The Ombudsman: Is Review By Peers As Fair As It Appears?

  1982cited by this paper
• Improving research on and policies for peer-review practices

  1982cited by this paper
• Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article

  1982cited by this paper
• Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again

  1982cited by this paper
• Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles

  1982cited by this paper
• Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments.

  1978influential reference
• Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27

  1976cited by this paper
• Referees and research administrators: barriers to scientific research?

  1974cited by this paper
• Should the History of Science Be Rated X?

  1974cited by this paper
• Research Article Productivity of U. S. Journalism Faculties

  1973cited by this paper
• Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery.

  1961cited by this paper

• Publication Delay and Article Citation: Evidence from Accounting

  2025cites this paper
• PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS WITH PEER REVIEW, IMPACT FACTOR AND CITATION INDEX: A RESPONSE TO

  2025cites this paper
• An empirical exploration of the subjectivity problem of information qualities

  2024cites this paper
• Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review: A Model

  2023cites this paper
• The Social Systems Citation Theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links

  2022cites this paper
• Journal and disciplinary variations in academic open peer review anonymity, outcomes, and length

  2022cites this paper
• Commentary: On the merit of an early contributor of the "Preparation for Oxidative Stress" (POS) theory.

  2022cites this paper
• How do journals of different rank instruct reviewers? An analysis of reviewer guidelines in the field of management

  2021cites this paper
• Publishing in co-authorship: A comparison of the motivations between more and less prolific Management scholars in Brazil

  2020cites this paper
• fetishisation of excellence

  2020cites this paper
• How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management

  2020cites this paper
• Embracing unpopular ideas: Introduction to the special section on heterodox issues in psychology.

  2020cites this paper
• Violins in the Subway: Scarcity Correlations, Evaluative Cultures, and Disciplinary Authority in the Digital Humanities

  2020cites this paper
• Leonardo da Vinci: The Archetype of Sleeping Beauty in Science

  2020cites this paper
• Reading Peer Review

  2020cites this paper
• Benchmark entre revistas científicas da área de administração Benchmark between scientific journals of the management area Benchmark entre revistas científicas del área de gestión

  2019cites this paper
• Intersectionality in Digital Humanities

  2019cites this paper
• A reply from a ‘pracademic’: It is not all mischief, and there is scope to educate budding authors

  2019cites this paper
• Sleeping Beauties of Political Science: The Case of AF Bentley

  2017cites this paper
• “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence

  2017cites this paper
• Sleeping Beauties of Political Science: The Case of AF Bentley

  2017cites this paper
• Erratum: “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence

  2017cites this paper
• Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers

  2017cites this paper
• How Innovative Are Editors?: Evidence across Journals and Disciplines.

  2017cites this paper
• Nature of Science in Science Education: An Integrated View

  2016cites this paper
• At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014

  2016cites this paper
• Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach

  2016cites this paper
• What We Still Don’t Know About Peer Review

  2016cites this paper
• Is It Possible to Assess Progress in Science

  2016cites this paper
• Western blotting: remembrance of things past.

  2015cites this paper
• Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: the journals Nature, Science and Cell

  2015cites this paper
• Fall of the Titans The Demise of Basic Neuroscience Research

  2015cites this paper
• The Editorial Review Process

  2015cites this paper
• Scientific publishing as the arena of power and caring

  2015cites this paper
• Publisher's Copyright Statement: Use Policy Educational Research, Peer Review and Editor Engagement *

  2014cites this paper
• The Shockley‐Queisser paper – A notable example of a scientific sleeping beauty

  2014cites this paper
• A aptidão dos pesquisadores brasileiros pertencentes aos programas de pós-graduação stricto sensu em Administração para pesquisas quantitativas

  2014cites this paper
• Creative accomplishments in science: definition, theoretical considerations, examples from science history, and bibliometric findings

  2013cites this paper
• IN THE PRESSURE OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHING: CALL FOR MORE ACCURATE, CONSTRUCTIVE, AND FASTER REVIEWS

  2013cites this paper
• Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?

  2013cites this paper
• A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review

  2013cites this paper
• What Determines Time Spent in Peer Reviews? – Evidence from The Accounting Review

  2013cites this paper
• Editorial review process

  2013cites this paper
• The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications

  2012cites this paper
• Why and how can “sleeping beauties” be awakened?

  2012cites this paper
• Additional Information: Use Policy Educational Research, Peer Review and Editor Engagement *

  2012cites this paper
• Was sind kreative Forschungsleistungen?

  2012cites this paper
• It takes time: A remarkable example of delayed recognition

  2012cites this paper
• Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing

  2011cites this paper
• ACCOUNTING RESEARCH: A CRITICAL VIEW OF THE PRESENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS

  2011cites this paper
• Covering Letters and Referees’ Objections

  2011cites this paper
• Fashion in Organization Theory: An Empirical Analysis of the Diffusion of Theoretical Concepts

  2011cites this paper
• Manoeuvring towards research decline: The RAE and the decline of Britain's international research standing

  2011cites this paper
• Design e metodi di ricerca pedagogica. Uno sguardo alle riviste di settore

  2011cites this paper
• Marketing's “Oscars”: a citation analysis of award‐winning articles

  2010cites this paper
• Unternehmen Wissenschaft?

  2010cites this paper
• On Hochberg et al.’s “The tragedy of the reviewer commons”

  2010cites this paper
• A comunicação científica e a bioética brasileira: uma análise dos periódicos científicos brasileiros

  2009cites this paper
• Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game?

  2009cites this paper
• Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel Laureates

  2009cites this paper
• Western blotting : remembrance of past things.

  2009cites this paper
• Western blotting : remembrance of past things.

  2009cites this paper
• Surviving Referees' Reports

  2008cites this paper
• Peer review and its contribution to manuscript quality: an Australian perspective

  2008cites this paper
• Confucio contra Sócrates: la perversa relación entre la investigación y la acreditación

  2008cites this paper
• O desafio de pesquisar e publicar em revistas científicas: a perspectiva de editores e revisores internacionais

  2008cites this paper
• Perspective - Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea Migration and Academic Journal Evolution

  2008cites this paper
• A Study of the Intersubjective Reviewer Agreement and Manuscript Improvement During the Evaluation Process of Journal Submissions

  2008cites this paper
• Publicar é difícil ou faltam competências? O desafio de pesquisar e publicar em revistas científicas na visão de editores e revisores internacionais

  2008cites this paper
• Once Upon a Time in America: Barriers to the Diffusion of Law & Economics

  2008cites this paper
• Uncertainty and information: Foundations of generalized information theory: Book Reviews

  2007cites this paper
• Publication bias and merit in ecology

  2007cites this paper
• The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas.

  2007cites this paper
• Metalogue as Methodology

  2007cites this paper
• Entwicklung von Organisationstheorien als Zeitgeistphänomen

  2007cites this paper
• Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea Migration and Academic Journal Evolution

  2006cites this paper
• Academic Electronic Journals: Past, Present, and Future

  2006cites this paper
• How to get published in the Australian Journal of Rural Health

  2006cites this paper
• How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication

  2005cites this paper
• Quantifying the "Goodness" of Library History Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Library History/Libraries & Culture

  2005cites this paper
• Advantages of two new approaches for scientific e-publishing

  2004cites this paper
• Challenging Dominant Physics Paradigms

  2004cites this paper
• Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline

  2004cites this paper
• Stagnation and herd mentality in the biomedical sciences

  2004cites this paper
• Científicos que cuestionan los paradigmas dominantes: Algunas implicaciones para la enseñanza de las ciencias

  2004cites this paper
• 'Omic' and hypothesis-driven research in the molecular pharmacology of cancer.

  2002cites this paper
• Qualitative Social Work

  2002cites this paper
• The parallelism between scientists' and students' resistance to new scientific ideas

  2002cites this paper
• EL SISTEMA DE REVISIÓN POR EXPERTOS (PEER REVIEW): MUCHOS PROBLEMAS Y POCAS SOLUCIONES.

  2002cites this paper
• Suppression of scientific research: Bahramdipity and Nulltiple scientific discoveries

  2001cites this paper
• Peer Review by School Science Students: Its Role in Scientific Inquiry

  2001cites this paper
• Research Publication: Ethical Aspects

  2001cites this paper
• Publishing qualitative adult education research: A peer review perspective

  2001cites this paper
• EL DESARROLLO DE LA METACOGNICIÓN EN EL APRENDIZAJE DE LAS CIENCIAS: ESTRATEGIAS PARA EL PROFESOR Y ACTIVIDADES ORIENTADAS AL ALUMNO

  2000cites this paper
• La ciencia que no enseñamos

  1999cites this paper
• Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1

  1998cites this paper
• Social Context of Human Computer Interaction : An Examination of User Adoption of Electronic Journals

  1997cites this paper
• UsingCitation Classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery

  1996cites this paper
• Subjective judgements in scientific practice and art

  year unknowncites this paper
• Welcome Letter from the Editors

  year unknowncites this paper