In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

• Publication date

  2018-02-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/1556264617743834PMID 29179623
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  2019cited by this paper
• Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.

  2016cited by this paper
• Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right

  2016cited by this paper
• Prosocial Conformity

  2016cited by this paper
• Reproducibility in science

  2015cited by this paper
• Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

  2015cited by this paper
• Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research

  2015cited by this paper
• Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

  2015cited by this paper
• Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands

  2015cited by this paper
• Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean?

  2015cited by this paper
• Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists

  2014cited by this paper
• Three-Level Mechanism of Consumer Digital Piracy: Development and Cross-Cultural Validation

  2014cited by this paper
• Replication of “Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth” by Williams and Bargh (2008).

  2014cited by this paper
• Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology †

  2013cited by this paper
• A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories

  2012cited by this paper
• New insights into the problem of software piracy: The effects of neutralization, shame, and moral beliefs

  2012cited by this paper
• Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall’ Effect

  2012cited by this paper
• Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

  2012cited by this paper
• False-Positive Psychology

  2011cited by this paper
• Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries

  2011cited by this paper
• Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data

  2010cited by this paper
• User Awareness of Security Countermeasures and Its Impact on Information Systems Misuse: A Deterrence Approach

  2009cited by this paper
• How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

  2009cited by this paper
• The Regulation of Corporate Violations Punishment, Compliance, and the Blurring of Responsibility

  2006cited by this paper
• Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  2005cited by this paper
• examining the role of differential association and techniques of neutralization in explaining corporate crime

  2005cited by this paper
• Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.

  2005cited by this paper
• An integrative model of computer abuse based on social control and general deterrence theories

  2004cited by this paper
• Understanding White Collar Crime

  2001cited by this paper
• Choices, Values, and Frames

  2000cited by this paper
• The Mystery of the Mozart Effect: Failure to Replicate

  1999cited by this paper
• The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.

  1966cited by this paper
• A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis

  1965cited by this paper
• CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment

  year unknowncited by this paper

• The ‘shades of grey’ in research integrity—Researchers admit to questionable research practices that they do not perceive to be serious

  2026cites this paper
• Academic research values: Conceptualization and initial steps of scale development

  2025cites this paper
• Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not

  2025cites this paper
• The Mindful Scientist: How Meditation Could Support Ethical Scientific Practice

  2025cites this paper
• Honest yet unacceptable research practices: when research becomes a health risk

  2025cites this paper
• Dishonesty, Neutralisation and Nudging

  2024cites this paper
• When I use a word . . . Academic integrity—defining misdemeanours

  2024cites this paper
• Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture

  2024cites this paper
• Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research

  2024cites this paper
• Interdisciplinary lessons and recommendations for the evaluation of replicability in behavioral sciences

  2024cites this paper
• Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy

  2023cites this paper
• Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns

  2023cites this paper
• Questionable research practices in competitive grant funding: A survey

  2023cites this paper
• Assessing the Online Scientific Community’s Support for Various Reasons for Article Retraction: A Preliminary Survey

  2023cites this paper
• Effects of Gain/Loss Frames on Telling Lies of Omission and Commission

  2022cites this paper
• Exploring COVID-19 research credibility among Spanish scientists

  2022cites this paper
• Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness

  2021cites this paper
• Teaching Research in Principle and in Practice: What Do Psychology Instructors Think of Research Projects in Their Courses?

  2021cites this paper
• Page Proof Instructions and Queries

  2020cites this paper
• Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies

  2020influential citation
• Skin in the Game: Personal Accountability and Journal Peer Review

  2020cites this paper
• On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations

  2020cites this paper
• Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices

  2020cites this paper
• Institutional Approaches to Research Integrity in Ghana

  2020cites this paper
• Methods of Causal Analysis for Health Risk Assessment with Observational Data

  2020cites this paper
• Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts

  2019cites this paper
• Scientific Misconduct in Psychology: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Estimates and New Empirical Data

  2019cites this paper
• Page Proof Instructions and Queries

  2019cites this paper
• Assessing the Efficacy of a Training Intervention to Reduce Acceptance of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology Graduate Students

  2019cites this paper
• Testing an active intervention to deter researchers’ use of questionable research practices

  2019cites this paper
• Ambiguity : Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices

  2018influential citation
• Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices

  2018cites this paper
• Writing Empirical Articles: Transparency, Reproducibility, Clarity, and Memorability

  2018cites this paper
• Modernizing the Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causal relationships in observational data

  2018cites this paper