Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2004

• Venue

  Gastroenterology

• Publication date

  2004-08-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2004.05.032PMID 15300577
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Is There a True “shift” to the Right Colon in the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer?

  2003cited by this paper
• Complete colonoscopy rarely misses cancer.

  2002cited by this paper
• Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.

  2000cited by this paper
• Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

  2000cited by this paper
• Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma

  1999cited by this paper
• Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

  1997cited by this paper
• Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

  1997cited by this paper
• Textbook of Gastroenterology

  1995cited by this paper
• Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

  1993cited by this paper
• Evolving colonoscopy skills in a rural family practice: the first 293 cases.

  1993cited by this paper
• Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

  1993cited by this paper
• Colonoscopy Versus Barium Enema in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancers and Polyps

  1993cited by this paper
• Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy.

  1990cited by this paper
• The International Classification of Diseases.

  1958cited by this paper

• Efecto de reunión trimestral y reporte por correo electrónico de TDA, tasa de intubación cecal y tiempo de retirada sobre medidas de calidad personales y de grupo en colonoscopia

  2025cites this paper
• Effect of quarterly meeting and email report of ADR, cecal intubation rate, and withdrawal time on personal and group quality measures in colonoscopy.

  2025cites this paper
• CD24-Targeted NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging Enables Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.

  2024cites this paper
• Improving polyp detection at colonoscopy: Non-technological techniques

  2023cites this paper
• Cap-assisted colonoscopy can increase the rate of sessile serrated lesion detection at the left lateral decubitus position: A retrospective case-control study

  2023cites this paper
• Morphology, Histopathology, and Anatomical Distribution of Sporadic Colorectal Polyps in Chinese Patients

  2023cites this paper
• Impact of a scalable training program on the quality of colonoscopy performance and risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.

  2023cites this paper
• The Accuracy of Different Modalities Used for Preoperative Primary Tumour Localisation in Operated Colorectal Cancer Patients

  2023cites this paper
• Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.

  2022cites this paper
• Impact of photodocumentation of caecal intubation on colonoscopy outcomes

  2021cites this paper
• Improvement in colorectal cancer outcomes over time is limited to patients with left-sided disease

  2021cites this paper
• Assessment of Quality Indexes in Colonoscopy in the Coloproctology Service of a Tertiary Private Hospital in Southern Brazil

  2021cites this paper
• Diagnostic yield of repeat screening colonoscopy ten years after an adenoma-negative index screening endoscopy

  2021cites this paper
• A fecal-based test for the detection of advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer: a case-control and screening cohort study

  2021cites this paper
• Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2020cites this paper
• The Optimal Imaging Window for Dysplastic Colorectal Polyp Detection Using c-Met–Targeted Fluorescence Molecular Endoscopy

  2020cites this paper
• Detection rates for adenomas, serrated polyps and clinically relevant serrated polyps can be easily estimated by individually calculated detection rate ratios

  2020cites this paper
• Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and its application in colorectal cancer diagnosis and screening: A narrative review.

  2020cites this paper
• Randomised comparison of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals following a two-round baseline colonoscopy: the Japan Polyp Study Workgroup

  2020cites this paper
• Chapter 12 Virtual Colonoscopy

  2019cites this paper
• General Discussion and Future Perspectives

  2019cites this paper
• Diabetes Mellitus and Age are Risk Factors of Interval Colon Cancer: A Case-Control Study

  2019cites this paper
• Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National Health Service: population based cohort study

  2019cites this paper
• Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Differentiation of Colon Polyps: A Technical Review for Physicians

  2019cites this paper
• Feasibility and economic assessment of chromocolonoscopy for detection of proximal serrated neoplasia within a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme (CONSCOP): an open-label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

  2019cites this paper
• A clinically translatable hyperspectral endoscopy (HySE) system for imaging the gastrointestinal tract

  2019cites this paper
• Coloproctology procedure clinic: a novel service developed to reduce suffering of patients with bleeding per rectum

  2019cites this paper
• Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

  2019cites this paper
• Uptake of colorectal cancer screening tests by Ontario physicians.

  2019cites this paper
• Volumetric growth rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps observed in situ at longitudinal CT colonography

  2019cites this paper
• Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Pancolonic Retroflexed Viewing Using a Short-turn Radius Colonoscope

  2019cites this paper
• Diagnostic application of water exchange colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  2019cites this paper
• [Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-based Colonoscopy Screening].

  2018cites this paper
• The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.

  2018cites this paper
• Interval colorectal cancer rates after Hemoccult Sensa and survival by detection mode for individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Winnipeg, Manitoba

  2018cites this paper
• Cap-assisted endoscopy: Do we have enough evidence?

  2018cites this paper
• Critères de qualité de la coloscopie dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal : évaluation des pratiques au CHU de Rouen sur la période de 2014 à 2018

  2018cites this paper
• Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening

  2018cites this paper
• Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service

  2018cites this paper
• Quality Assurance of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy as a Screening Tool for Colorectal Cancer

  2018cites this paper
• Does the withdrawal time affect adenoma detection in non-screening colonoscopies?

  2018cites this paper
• The frequency and associations of post endoscopy gastro-intestinal cancers

  2017cites this paper
• Position change during colonoscopy improves caecal intubation rate, mucosal visibility, and adenoma detection in patients with suboptimal caecal preparation

  2017cites this paper
• The colorectal cancer screening: the current global situation and the main standards for the quality of screening colonoscopy recommended by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)

  2017cites this paper
• New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance

  2017cites this paper
• BIOGEOCHEMICAL BEHAVIOUR OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL-PLANT SYSTEM

  2017cites this paper
• Predicting ADR from PDR and individual adenoma-to-polyp-detection-rate ratio for screening and surveillance colonoscopies: A new approach to quality assessment

  2017cites this paper
• [Comparative analysis of colorectal cancer screening approaches].

  2017cites this paper
• A survey-based analysis on endoscopic quality indicators compliance among Spanish endoscopists.

  2017cites this paper
• Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies.

  2017cites this paper
• A fluorogenic probe for sensitive detection of MMP-2/9 activities in clinical colorectal cancer tissues

  2017cites this paper
• S3-Leitlinie – Kolorektales Karzinom

  2017cites this paper
• The clinical effectiveness of different surveillance strategies to prevent colorectal cancer in people with intermediate-grade colorectal adenomas: a retrospective cohort analysis, and psychological and economic evaluations.

  2017cites this paper
• MicroRNAs as molecular markers for colon cancer Diagnostic screening in stool & blood

  2017influential citation
• Quality Colorectal Cancer Screening: Endoscopic Performance Measures and Beyond

  2017cites this paper
• Higher adenoma detection rate with the endocuff: a randomized trial

  2017cites this paper
• An algorithm to predict advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia in Chinese asymptomatic population

  2017cites this paper
• Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.

  2016cites this paper
• Izinova®, nouvelle préparation orale à diluer pour lavage colique

  2016cites this paper
• Design and Synthesis of Near-Infrared Peptide for in Vivo Molecular Imaging of HER2.

  2016cites this paper
• Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.

  2016cites this paper
• The efficacy of autofluorescence imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal diseases

  2016cites this paper
• Accrediting for screening-related colonoscopy services: What is required of the endoscopist and of the endoscopy service?

  2016cites this paper
• Colon Cancer Screening in North Carolina

  2016cites this paper
• A wide variation of the quality of colonoscopy reporting system in the real clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea

  2016cites this paper
• Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators

  2016cites this paper
• Rate and Predictors of Interval Esophageal and Gastric Cancers after Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the United States

  2016cites this paper
• Stool DNA Testing for Screening Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in Alaska Native People.

  2016cites this paper
• Screening colonoscopy and colorectal cancer: a single center long term study

  2016cites this paper
• Multi-Target Stool DNA Test: A New High Bar for Noninvasive Screening

  2015cites this paper
• Defining characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer requiring emergency surgery

  2015cites this paper
• No decrease in the rate of early or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy with polypectomy over a 10-year period: a population-based analysis.

  2015cites this paper
• Quality assessment of colonoscopy in Flanders: a voluntary survey among Flemish gastroenterologist.

  2015cites this paper
• Optimizing colonoscopy outcomes in daily clinical practice

  2015cites this paper
• Can I Improve My Adenoma Detection Rate?

  2015cites this paper
• Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study

  2015cites this paper
• Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study

  2015cites this paper
• What is the criterion for high-performing colonoscopists? Being meticulous!

  2015cites this paper
• Adjusting for patient demographics has minimal effects on rates of adenoma detection in a large, community-based setting.

  2015cites this paper
• Opportunistic colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy. Comparative results between two historical cohorts in Bucharest, Romania.

  2015cites this paper
• Effects of metabolic syndrome and findings from baseline colonoscopies on occurrence of colorectal neoplasms.

  2015cites this paper
• Improving quality in endoscopy: are we nearly there yet?

  2015cites this paper
• Risk Factors of Developing Interval Early Gastric Cancer After Negative Endoscopy

  2015cites this paper
• Colorectal Cancer Risk Following Adenoma Removal: A Large Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study

  2015cites this paper
• Meticulous cecal image documentation at colonoscopy is associated with improved polyp detection

  2015cites this paper
• Intraprocedural bowel cleansing with the JetPrep cleansing system improves adenoma detection.

  2015cites this paper
• Insertion water exchange minimizes endoscopist multitasking during withdrawal inspection-a plausible explanation for enhanced polyp detection in the right colon

  2015cites this paper
• Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies

  2015cites this paper
• Advanced endoscopic imaging in the gastrointestinal tract: improving the view of Neoplasia

  2015cites this paper
• Systematic analysis of missed colorectal cancer cases and common pitfalls in diagnosis

  2015cites this paper
• Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy

  2015cites this paper
• Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy – results of the CLEVER study

  2015cites this paper
• [Rapidly Growing Interval Colon Cancer].

  2015cites this paper
• S2k-Leitlinie Qualitätsanforderungen in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie (Kurzversion), AWMF Register Nr. 021–022

  2015cites this paper
• Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service

  2014cites this paper
• Role of MicroRNA Molecules in Colon Cancer Etiology

  2014cites this paper
• Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial.

  2014cites this paper
• Adenomas and Carcinomas Missed in Routine Colonoscopy: A Prospective Study in Resected Colon Segments

  2014cites this paper
• miRNA as markers for the diagnostic screening of colon cancer

  2014cites this paper
• Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

  2014cites this paper