You Cannot Step Into the Same River Twice

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Perspectives on Psychological Science

• Publication date

  2014-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/1745691614548513PMID 26186112
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project

  2022cited by this paper
• The Connection Between Varying Treatment Effects and the Crisis of Unreplicable Research

  2015cited by this paper
• P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.

  2014cited by this paper
• Registered Reports A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results

  2014cited by this paper
• A Duty to Describe

  2014cited by this paper
• The New Statistics

  2014influential reference
• The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication?

  2014cited by this paper
• Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology †

  2013cited by this paper
• Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias.

  2013cited by this paper
• A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models

  2013cited by this paper
• Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science

  2012cited by this paper
• Replication studies: Bad copy

  2012cited by this paper
• Advances in Meta-Analysis

  2012cited by this paper
• Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

  2012cited by this paper
• An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science

  2012cited by this paper
• Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.

  2011cited by this paper
• Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste

  2011influential reference
• False-Positive Psychology

  2011cited by this paper
• PERSPECTIVE - Researchers Should Make Thoughtful Assessments Instead of Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests

  2011cited by this paper
• A non-degenerate estimator for hierarchical variance parameters via penalized likelihood estimation

  2011cited by this paper
• Elements of probability theory

  2010cited by this paper
• Great Expectations?! Assortment Size, Expectations, and Satisfaction

  2010influential reference
• “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences

  2010cited by this paper
• How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

  2009cited by this paper
• The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

  2009cited by this paper
• Of Beauty, Sex and Power

  2009cited by this paper
• Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

  2009cited by this paper
• What Moderates the Too-Much-Choice Effect?

  2009influential reference
• Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice

  2009influential reference
• Buying Behavior as a Function of Parametric Variation of Number of Choices

  2007influential reference
• G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

  2007cited by this paper
• An Introduction to the Bootstrap

  2007cited by this paper
• The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?

  2006influential reference
• The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant

  2006cited by this paper
• Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  2005cited by this paper
• Mindless statistics

  2004cited by this paper
• Things I Have Learned ( So Far )

  2002cited by this paper
• The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals.

  2001cited by this paper
• Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge

  2000cited by this paper
• Replication and Theory Development in Organizational Science: A Critical Realist Perspective

  1999cited by this paper
• The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing

  1999cited by this paper
• Needed: A Ban on the Significance Test

  1997cited by this paper
• Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers

  1996cited by this paper
• Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action.

  1996cited by this paper
• The earth is round (p < .05)

  1994cited by this paper
• A Handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences : methodological issues

  1993cited by this paper
• Rational appraisal of psychological research and the good-enough principle.

  1993cited by this paper
• QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer

  1992influential reference
• The Arrangement of Field Experiments

  1992cited by this paper
• Replication Research in the Social Sciences

  1991cited by this paper
• Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science

  1989cited by this paper
• On the Origins of the .05 Level of Statistical Significance

  1982cited by this paper
• Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.

  1978cited by this paper
• The test of significance in psychological research.

  1966cited by this paper
• The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test.

  1960cited by this paper
• An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics

  1951cited by this paper
• An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics.

  1911cited by this paper
• An introduction to the theory of statistics (4th ed.).

  year unknowncited by this paper
• Aix-Marseille University,

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Reflections on Conducting a Large Replication Project in Sports and Exercise Science

  2025cites this paper
• Single paper meta‐analysis is unavoidable

  2025cites this paper
• The Critical Challenge of using Large-Scale Digital Experiment Platforms for Scientific Discovery

  2025cites this paper
• Consistent activation differences versus differences in consistent activation: Evaluating meta-analytic contrasts

  2024cites this paper
• Uncertainty limits the use of power analysis.

  2024cites this paper
• Planning falsifiable confirmatory research.

  2024cites this paper
• Being and Beyonding: The Poetry of Kamala Das

  2024cites this paper
• The Effect of Different Construct Operationalizations, Study Duration, and Preprocessing Choices on Power-Based Sample Size Recommendations in Intensive Longitudinal Research

  2024cites this paper
• Impacts of Unethical Behavior on Self-Esteem: A Contingent Dual-Process Model

  2024cites this paper
• Adventitious Error and Its Implications for Testing Relations Between Variables and for Composite Measurement Outcomes

  2024cites this paper
• “Statistical Significance” and Statistical Reporting: Moving Beyond Binary

  2023cites this paper
• A systematic review of null hypothesis significance testing, sample sizes, and statistical power in research using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure

  2023cites this paper
• Accelerating Psychological Science With Metastudies: A Demonstration Using the Risky-Choice Framing Effect

  2022cites this paper
• Perspective: Replication does not reliably measure scientific productivity

  2022cites this paper
• Heterogeneity estimates in a biased world

  2022cites this paper
• Selecting on statistical significance and practical importance is wrong

  2022influential citation
• On the Accuracy of Replication Failure Rates

  2022cites this paper
• An evaluation of the impact of flipped-classroom teaching on mathematics proficiency and self-efficacy in Saudi Arabia

  2022cites this paper
• Are Past and Future Selves Perceived Differently from Present Self? Replication and Extension of Pronin and Ross (2006) Temporal Differences in Trait Self-Ascription

  2021cites this paper
• Optimizing Research Output: How Can Psychological Research Methods Be Improved?

  2021cites this paper
• Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution

  2021cites this paper
• Does competence or morality mainly drive self-esteem? It depends on general system justification

  2021cites this paper
• Effects of behavioural skill training on cognitive antecedents and exercise and sport behaviour in high school students: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

  2021cites this paper
• What can experimental studies of bias tell us about real-world group disparities?

  2021cites this paper
• Heterogeneity of Research Results as a New Perspective to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science

  2021influential citation
• Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science

  2021influential citation
• Best practices in replication: a case study of common information in coordination games

  2020cites this paper
• Defending the Queen’s Pride: Effect of the menstrual cycle phase on conspicuous consumption

  2020cites this paper
• On the Practicality of Extremely Large Educational RCTs

  2020cites this paper
• Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis

  2020cites this paper
• Thinking about effect sizes: From the replication crisis to a cumulative psychological science.

  2020cites this paper
• A case against default effect sizes in sport and exercise science

  2020cites this paper
• Statistical Significance Filtering Overestimates Effects and Impedes Falsification: A Critique of

  2020cites this paper
• Moving Beyond Unwise Replication Practices: The Case of Romantic Motivation

  2019cites this paper
• Leaving an attacked group: Authoritative criticism decreases ingroup favoritism

  2019cites this paper
• Best (but oft forgotten) practices: sample size planning for powerful studies.

  2019cites this paper
• The probability of conceptual replication and the variability of effect size

  2019cites this paper
• Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate

  2019cites this paper
• The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity

  2019cites this paper
• Heterogeneity of research results: New perspectives on psychological science

  2019influential citation
• Aging and Recognition Memory: A Meta-Analysis

  2019cites this paper
• The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.

  2019influential citation
• Leveraging the Open Science Framework in clinical psychological assessment research.

  2019cites this paper
• Putin and the Iranian–Israeli Conflict

  2018cites this paper
• Effect Size Estimation From t-Statistics in the Presence of Publication Bias: A Brief Review of Existing Approaches With Some Extensions

  2018cites this paper
• Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies.

  2018cites this paper
• Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis

  2018cites this paper
• Laboratory experimentation in marketing

  2018cites this paper
• Polarization and positivity effects: Divergent roles of group entitativity in warmth and competence judgments

  2018cites this paper
• Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size

  2018cites this paper
• Zur Methodologie von Replikationsstudien

  2018cites this paper
• “Groupy” Allies Are More Beneficial While “Groupy” Enemies Are More Harmful

  2018cites this paper
• The moderating effect of general system justification on the relationship between unethical behavior and self-esteem

  2018cites this paper
• A Brief, Distance-Based Intervention Can Increase Intentions to Follow Evidence-Based Guidelines in Cancer Screening

  2018cites this paper
• Want to make behavioural research more replicable? Promote single paper meta‐analysis

  2018cites this paper
• The Attitude of Academics to Change Management: A University Case Study

  2018cites this paper
• How to Plan Falsifiable Confirmatory Research

  2018cites this paper
• Toward Replicability With Confidence Intervals for the Exceedance Probability

  2018cites this paper
• Addressing the “Replication Crisis”: Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power

  2017cites this paper
• Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research

  2017cites this paper
• Multilevel Multivariate Meta-analysis with Application to Choice Overload

  2017cites this paper
• 2 DESIGNING A STUDY TO MAXIMIZE INFORMATIONAL VALUE

  2017cites this paper
• Replicability and Other Features of a High-Quality Science: Toward a Balanced and Empirical Approach

  2017cites this paper
• Experimental Design for Laboratory Biologists: Maximising Information and Improving Reproducibility. By Stanley E. Lazic. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. $175.00 (hardcover); $64.99 (paper). xv + 412 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-1-107-07429-3 (hc); 978-1-107-42488-3 (pb); 978-1-316

  2017cites this paper
• Single Paper Meta-Analysis: Benefits For Study Summary, Theory-Testing, and Replicability

  2017cites this paper
• Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research.

  2017cites this paper
• When Good Is Stickier Than Bad: Understanding Gain/Loss Asymmetries in Sequential Framing Effects

  2017cites this paper
• Abandon Statistical Significance

  2017cites this paper
• The role of implicit fear in the process of mental effort mobilization

  2016cites this paper
• Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach.

  2016cites this paper
• A brief mobile app reduces nonsuicidal and suicidal self-injury: Evidence from three randomized controlled trials.

  2016cites this paper
• Blinding Us to the Obvious? The Effect of Statistical Training on the Evaluation of Evidence

  2016cites this paper
• Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

  2016cites this paper
• Optimizing Research Payoff

  2016cites this paper
• What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science

  2016cites this paper
• INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES On the Psychological Function of Flags and Logos: Group Identity Symbols Increase Perceived Entitativity

  2016influential citation
• Measuring the Prevalence of Problematic Respondent Behaviors among MTurk, Campus, and Community Participants

  2016cites this paper
• Assessing Reproducibility and Value in Genomic Signatures

  2016cites this paper
• Who Needs Imagined Contact? Replication Attempts Examining Previous Contact as a Potential Moderator

  2016cites this paper
• Are most published social psychological findings false

  2016cites this paper
• Negotiating Co-governance of the Waikato River: Political Projects at Work

  2016cites this paper
• On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity.

  2016cites this paper
• Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean?

  2015cites this paper
• A Concise Set of Core Recommendations to Improve the Dependability of Psychological Research

  2015cites this paper
• A researcher's guide to regression, discretization, and median splits of continuous variables

  2015cites this paper
• Implicit happiness and sadness are associated with ease and difficulty: evidence from sequential priming

  2015cites this paper
• Implicit fear and effort-related cardiac response.

  2015cites this paper
• Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses

  2014cites this paper
• Introduction to the Special Section on Moving Toward a Cumulative Science

  2014cites this paper
• A Duty to Describe

  2014cites this paper
• Beyond the Two-Sciences Settlement

  2013cites this paper