Promoting uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy 'bowel scope' screening at St Mark's Hospital in London

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2018-04-28

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project

  2017cited by this paper
• Patient factors associated with non-attendance at colonoscopy after a positive screening faecal occult blood test

  2017cited by this paper
• Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial

  2017cited by this paper
• Active Choice and Financial Incentives to Increase Rates of Screening Colonoscopy-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

  2017cited by this paper
• Text-message Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening (TRICCS): a randomised controlled trial

  2017cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study

  2016cited by this paper
• A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening

  2016cited by this paper
• A pilot randomized controlled trial of telephone intervention to increase Breast Cancer Screening uptake in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS)

  2016cited by this paper
• Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme

  2016influential reference
• Effectiveness of patient navigator interventions on uptake of colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings.

  2016cited by this paper
• Reinvitation to screening colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial of reminding letter and invitation to educational meeting on attendance in nonresponders to initial invitation to screening colonoscopy (REINVITE)

  2016influential reference
• Use of a 12 months' self-referral reminder to facilitate uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening in previous non-responders: a London-based feasibility study

  2016cited by this paper
• Impact of general practice endorsement on the social gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening

  2016cited by this paper
• Effects of evidence-based strategies to reduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (ASCEND): four cluster-randomised controlled trials

  2016influential reference
• Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening

  2016cited by this paper
• The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer screening beliefs and intention

  2015cited by this paper
• Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes

  2015cited by this paper
• Improving uptake of screening for colorectal cancer: a study on invitation strategies and different test kit use

  2015cited by this paper
• Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison

  2015cited by this paper
• Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know

  2015cited by this paper
• Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: Results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders

  2015cited by this paper
• Theory of Planned Behavior

  2015cited by this paper
• Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study

  2015cited by this paper
• Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review

  2015cited by this paper
• An updated Asia Pacific Consensus Recommendations on colorectal cancer screening

  2014influential reference
• Effect of Payment Incentives on Cancer Screening in Ontario Primary Care

  2014cited by this paper
• Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test

  2014cited by this paper
• Evaluation of a service intervention to improve awareness and uptake of bowel cancer screening in ethnically-diverse areas

  2014cited by this paper
• The intention-to-treat principle: how to assess the true effect of choosing a medical treatment.

  2014cited by this paper
• An Automated Intervention With Stepped Increases in Support to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening

  2013cited by this paper
• The Impact of a Culturally Tailored Patient Navigator Program on Cervical Cancer Prevention in Latina Women

  2013cited by this paper
• COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ADVANCE NOTIFICATION LETTER TO INCREASE COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

  2013cited by this paper
• Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial.

  2013cited by this paper
• Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the evidence for flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening method for the prevention of colorectal cancer

  2012influential reference
• The NordICC Study: Rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer

  2012cited by this paper
• Comparing participation rates between immunochemical and guaiac faecal occult blood tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2012cited by this paper
• Patient navigation for breast and colorectal cancer in 3 community hospital settings

  2012cited by this paper
• Toward standardizing and reporting colorectal cancer screening indicators on an international level: The international colorectal cancer screening network

  2012cited by this paper
• European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: Overview and introduction to the full Supplement publication

  2012cited by this paper
• Literacy Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Clinics

  2012cited by this paper
• Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer in a Demonstration Screening Programme in the Uk

  2012cited by this paper
• Nottingham trial of faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a 20-year follow-up

  2011cited by this paper
• Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England.

  2011cited by this paper
• A higher detection rate for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomatous polyp for screening with immunochemical fecal occult blood test than guaiac fecal occult blood test, despite lower compliance rate. A prospective, controlled, feasibility study

  2011cited by this paper
• Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial

  2011cited by this paper
• The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010

  2011cited by this paper
• Pre-notification Increases Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in All Demographic Groups: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot

  2011influential reference
• Advance notification letters increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening: a population-based randomized trial.

  2011cited by this paper
• Fair society, healthy lives: Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010

  2010cited by this paper
• MINDSPACE: influencing behaviour for public policy

  2010cited by this paper
• Endorsement by the Primary Care Practitioner Consistently Improves Participation in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Longitudinal Analysis

  2010cited by this paper
• Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests

  2010influential reference
• European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis

  2010cited by this paper
• The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

  2010cited by this paper
• A quantitative analysis of body mass index and colorectal cancer: findings from 56 observational studies

  2010cited by this paper
• Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Uptake in a Population-based Pilot Programme

  2010cited by this paper
• Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy

  2009influential reference
• Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation.

  2009cited by this paper
• Fruit, vegetables, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.

  2009cited by this paper
• Association of Colonoscopy and Death from Colorectal Cancer

  2009cited by this paper
• Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology * †

  2008cited by this paper
• Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research

  2008cited by this paper
• Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.

  2007cited by this paper
• A Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Neoplasia

  2007cited by this paper
• Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine

  2007cited by this paper
• The impact of illustrations on public understanding of the aim of cancer screening.

  2006cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis: colorectal and small bowel cancer risk in patients with Crohn's disease

  2006cited by this paper
• A match-mismatch test of a stage model of behaviour change in tobacco smoking.

  2005cited by this paper
• Systematic review of the effectiveness of health behavior interventions based on the transtheoretical model

  2005cited by this paper
• Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior.

  2005influential reference
• Gender differences in utilization of colorectal cancer screening

  2005cited by this paper
• The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): Development, Design, and Dissemination

  2004cited by this paper
• Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer

  2004cited by this paper
• Cancer genes and the pathways they control

  2004cited by this paper
• Alcohol Intake and Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 8 Cohort Studies

  2004cited by this paper
• Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means

  2004cited by this paper
• Psychosocial and medical predictors of colorectal cancer screening among low-income medical outpatients.

  2004cited by this paper
• Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among Chinese-Americans.

  2004cited by this paper
• Barriers to Endoscopic Colorectal Cancer Screening: Are Women Different from Men?

  2004cited by this paper
• Patients' readiness for dietary change at the beginning of counselling: a transtheoretical model-based assessment.

  2003cited by this paper
• Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance.

  2003cited by this paper
• Increasing attendance at colorectal cancer screening: testing the efficacy of a mailed, psychoeducational intervention in a community sample of older adults.

  2003cited by this paper
• Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study.

  2003cited by this paper
• Using computers to narrowcast health messages: The role of audience segmentation, targeting, and tailoring in health promotion.

  2003cited by this paper
• Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial.

  2002cited by this paper
• Perceived Barriers and Benefits to Colon Cancer Screening among African Americans in North Carolina

  2002cited by this paper
• The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.

  2002cited by this paper
• Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis of 218 Controlled Studies

  2002cited by this paper
• Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process.

  2001cited by this paper
• Review of Computer-generated Outpatient Health Behavior Interventions:

  2001cited by this paper
• Time and money: effects of no-shows at a family practice residency clinic.

  2001cited by this paper
• The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

  2000cited by this paper
• Matched and mismatched interventions with young adult smokers: testing a stage theory.

  2000cited by this paper
• Underutilizers of mammography screening today: Characteristics of women planning, undecided about, and not planning a mammogram

  2000cited by this paper
• Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial

  2000cited by this paper
• Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps

  2000cited by this paper
• Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.

  2000cited by this paper
• Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

  2000cited by this paper
• A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory.

  2000cited by this paper

• Why are most colorectal cancers diagnosed outside of screening? A retrospective analysis of data from the English bowel screening programme

  2022cites this paper