Visual modifications to text are often used to obfuscate offensive comments in social media (e.g., “!d10t”) or as a writing style (“1337” in “leet speak”), among other scenarios. We consider this as a new type of adversarial attack in NLP, a setting to which humans are very robust, as our experiments with both simple and more difficult visual perturbations demonstrate. We investigate the impact of visual adversarial attacks on current NLP systems on character-, word-, and sentence-level tasks, showing that both neural and non-neural models are, in contrast to humans, extremely sensitive to such attacks, suffering performance decreases of up to 82%. We then explore three shielding methods—visual character embeddings, adversarial training, and rule-based recovery—which substantially improve the robustness of the models. However, the shielding methods still fall behind performances achieved in non-attack scenarios, which demonstrates the difficulty of dealing with visual attacks.
Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systems
Steffen Eger,Gözde Gül Şahin,Andreas Rücklé,Ji-Ung Lee,Claudia Schulz,Mohsen Mesgar,Krishnkant Swarnkar,Edwin Simpson,Iryna Gurevych
Published 2019 in North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
- Publication date
2019-02-25
- Fields of study
Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-34 of 34 references · Page 1 of 1