BLEEP—potential of mean force describing protein–ligand interactions: I. Generating potential

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1999

• Venue

  Journal of Computational Chemistry

• Publication date

  1999-08-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Chemistry

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199908)20:11<1165::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO;2-A
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Calculation of Ligand Binding Free Energies from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

  1998cited by this paper
• Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy.

  1998cited by this paper
• Are knowledge‐based potentials derived from protein structure sets discriminative with respect to amino acid types?

  1998cited by this paper
• How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to “true” potentials?

  1998cited by this paper
• Tertiary structure prediction using mean-force potentials and internal energy functions: successful prediction for coiled-coil geometries.

  1997cited by this paper
• BALI: Automatic Assignment of Bond and Atom Types for Protein Ligands in the Brookhaven Protein Databank

  1997cited by this paper
• Mean field analysis of FKBP12 complexes with FK506 and rapamycin: Implications for a role of crystallographic water molecules in molecular recognition and specificity

  1997cited by this paper
• PDBsum: a Web-based database of summaries and analyses of all PDB structures.

  1997cited by this paper
• Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding.

  1997cited by this paper
• Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation.

  1997cited by this paper
• Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins.

  1997cited by this paper
• Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level.

  1997cited by this paper
• Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

  1997cited by this paper
• SMOG : DE NOVO DESIGN METHOD BASED ON SIMPLE, FAST, AND ACCURATE FREE ENERGY ESTIMATES. 2. CASE STUDIES IN MOLECULAR DESIGN

  1997cited by this paper
• Residue-residue mean-force potentials for protein structure recognition.

  1997cited by this paper
• CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.

  1997cited by this paper
• Helmholtz free energy of peptide hydrogen bonds in proteins.

  1996cited by this paper
• Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they?

  1996cited by this paper
• Helmholtz free energies of atom pair interactions in proteins.

  1996cited by this paper
• A mean field model of ligand-protein interactions: implications for the structural assessment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease complexes and receptor-specific binding.

  1996cited by this paper
• SMoG: de Novo Design Method Based on Simple, Fast, and Accurate Free Energy Estimates. 1. Methodology and Supporting Evidence

  1996cited by this paper
• New methods for the analysis of the protein-solvent interface

  1995cited by this paper
• Knowledge-based potentials for proteins.

  1995cited by this paper
• A preference‐based free‐energy parameterization of enzyme‐inhibitor binding. Applications to HIV‐1‐protease inhibitor design

  1995cited by this paper
• Empirical free energy calculations of ligand-protein crystallographic complexes. I. Knowledge-based ligand-protein interaction potentials applied to the prediction of human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease binding affinity.

  1995cited by this paper
• Ordered water in macromolecular structure

  1994cited by this paper
• Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins.

  1994cited by this paper
• AQUARIUS2: Knowledge‐based modeling of solvent sites around proteins

  1993cited by this paper
• Recognition of errors in three‐dimensional structures of proteins

  1993cited by this paper
• A new approach to protein fold recognition

  1992cited by this paper
• Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins.

  1990cited by this paper
• The nature of the N  H…︁OC hydrogen bond: An intermolecular perturbation theory study of the formamide/formaldehyde complex

  1990cited by this paper
• A reliable semi-empirical approach for evaluating the isotropic intermolecular forces between closed-shell systems.

  1979cited by this paper
• The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

  1977cited by this paper

• MetaDOCK: A Combinatorial Molecular Docking Approach

  2023cites this paper
• Molecular modeling in drug discovery

  2022cites this paper
• Advances in structure-based drug design

  2021cites this paper
• Proteome‐Scale Drug‐Target Interaction Predictions: Approaches and Applications

  2021cites this paper
• Molecular docking analysis: Basic technique to predict drug-receptor interactions

  2021cites this paper
• In Silico Approach in Drug Design and Drug Discovery: An Update

  2021cites this paper
• Amino acid signatures of HLA Class-I and II molecules are strongly associated with SLE susceptibility and autoantibody production in Eastern Asians

  2019cites this paper
• Virtual Screening and Its Applications in Drug Discovery Process

  2019cites this paper
• Molecular Docking in Modern Drug Discovery: Principles and Recent Applications

  2019influential citation
• Modeling of Membrane Proteins

  2018cites this paper
• Corrigendum to “All-Atom Four-Body Knowledge-Based Statistical Potentials to Distinguish Native Protein Structures from Nonnative Folds”

  2018cites this paper
• All-atom four-body knowledge-based statistical potential to distinguish native tertiary RNA structures from nonnative folds.

  2018cites this paper
• Aromatic interactions at the ligand-protein interface: Implications for the development of docking scoring functions.

  2018cites this paper
• High-Throughput and In Silico Screening in Drug Discovery

  2017cites this paper
• An Atomistic Statistically Effective Energy Function for Computational Protein Design.

  2016cites this paper
• Computational methods in drug discovery

  2016cites this paper
• Discriminate protein decoys from native by using a scoring function based on ubiquitous Phi and Psi angles computed for all atom.

  2016cites this paper
• Scoring Functions of Protein-Ligand Interactions

  2016cites this paper
• Virtual screening: an in silico tool for interlacing the chemical universe with the proteome.

  2015cites this paper
• - Library Design, Chemical Space, and Drug Likeness

  2015cites this paper
• Recent Trends in In-silico Drug Discovery

  2015cites this paper
• - Protein–Ligand Docking: From Basic Principles to Advanced Applications

  2015cites this paper
• Accounting for Intraligand Interactions in Flexible Ligand Docking with a PMF-Based Scoring Function

  2015cites this paper
• Molecular docking studies towards development of novel Gly-Phe analogs for potential inhibition of Cathepsin C (dipeptidyl peptidase I)

  2014cites this paper
• Modeling Protein-Ligand Interactions with Applications to Drug Design

  2014cites this paper
• Protein Ligand DockingDocking in Drug DiscoveryDrug Discovery

  2014cites this paper
• Design of p53-derived peptides with cytotoxicity on breast cancer

  2014cites this paper
• CHAPTER 1. MOLECULAR RECOGNITION IN A DIVERSE SET OF PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS STUDIED WITH MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS AND END-POINT FREE ENERGY

  2014cites this paper
• Enrichment of Chemical Libraries Docked to Protein Conformational Ensembles and Application to Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2

  2014cites this paper
• Some Critical Aspects of Molecular Interactions Between Drugs and Receptors

  2014cites this paper
• Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein–Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity?

  2014cites this paper
• KECSA-Movable Type Implicit Solvation Model (KMTISM)

  2014cites this paper
• A Bayesian statistical approach of improving knowledge‐based scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions

  2014cites this paper
• Automated Large-Scale File Preparation, Docking, and Scoring: Evaluation of ITScore and STScore Using the 2012 Community Structure-Activity Resource Benchmark

  2013cites this paper
• HotLig: A Molecular Surface-Directed Approach to Scoring Protein-Ligand Interactions

  2013cites this paper
• Regulatory mechanism of the light‐activable allosteric switch LOV–TAP for the control of DNA binding: A computer simulation study

  2013cites this paper
• Fast and exhaustive: Development of new protein-ligand scoring algorithms and sampling methods

  2013cites this paper
• Development of the Knowledge-Based and Empirical Combined Scoring Algorithm (KECSA) To Score Protein-Ligand Interactions

  2013cites this paper
• Computational methods of studying the binding of toxins from venomous animals to biological ion channels: theory and applications.

  2013cites this paper
• A multibody atomic statistical potential for the prediction of enzyme-inhibitor binding energy

  2012cites this paper
• Ligand and Receptor Conformational Energies

  2012cites this paper
• Generation of atomic four-body statistical potentials derived from the delaunay tessellation of protein structures

  2012cites this paper
• Knowledge-based scoring function derived from atomic tessellation of macromolecular structures for prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity

  2012cites this paper
• On the estimation of ligand binding affinities

  2012cites this paper
• Scoring Functions for Protein–Ligand Interactions

  2012cites this paper
• Coarse-Grained Models of Proteins: Theory and Applications

  2011cites this paper
• CSAR Benchmark Exercise of 2010: Selection of the Protein–Ligand Complexes

  2011cites this paper
• Scoring and Lessons Learned with the CSAR Benchmark Using an Improved Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function

  2011cites this paper
• Informatics, machine learning and computational medicinal chemistry.

  2011cites this paper
• Targeting serpins in high-throughput and structure-based drug design.

  2011cites this paper
• Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery.

  2011cites this paper
• The Challenge of Affinity Prediction: Scoring Functions for Structure‐Based Virtual Screening

  2011cites this paper
• Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions.

  2010cites this paper
• Computational analyses of protein-ligand interactions

  2010cites this paper
• Benchmarking docking and scoring protocol for the identification of potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

  2010cites this paper
• Docking and Scoring in Drug Discovery

  2010cites this paper
• Quantitative prediction of protein‐protein binding affinity with a potential of mean force considering volume correction

  2010cites this paper
• Inclusion of Solvation and Entropy in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions

  2010cites this paper
• In Silico Screening

  2010cites this paper
• Chapter 14 - Mean-Force Scoring Functions for Protein–Ligand Binding

  2010cites this paper
• A novel method for protein‐ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration

  2009cites this paper
• Understanding Membrane Proteins. How to Design Inhibitors of Transmembrane Protein—Protein Interactions

  2009cites this paper
• Ligand and structure-based methodologies for the prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor ligands

  2009cites this paper
• Analysis of knowledge‐based protein‐ligand potentials using a self‐consistent method

  2008cites this paper
• The Docking Problem

  2008cites this paper
• Poly(amidoamine) dendrimers on lipid bilayers I: Free energy and conformation of binding.

  2008cites this paper
• Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction

  2008cites this paper
• An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function for protein–protein recognition

  2008cites this paper
• An improved method of potential of mean force for protein-protein interactions

  2008cites this paper
• From Molecular Modeling to Drug Design

  2008cites this paper
• Interfacial atom pair analysis

  2008cites this paper
• Geometrical Preferences of the Hydrogen Bonds on Protein-Ligand Binding Interface Derived from Statistical Surveys and Quantum Mechanics Calculations.

  2008cites this paper
• Prediction of binding affinities of thrombin and trypsin inhibitors by chemometric modeling

  2007cites this paper
• HIGH-THROUGHPUT SIMULATION METHODS FOR PROTEIN-LIGAND DOCKING

  2007cites this paper
• Scoring functions and enrichment: a case study on Hsp90

  2007cites this paper
• High-Throughput Simulation Methods for Protein-Ligand Docking

  2007cites this paper
• 4.19 – Virtual Screening

  2007cites this paper
• Receptor‐specific scoring functions derived from quantum chemical models improve affinity estimates for in‐silico drug discovery

  2007cites this paper
• Metastability of microtubules induced by competing internal forces.

  2007cites this paper
• Structure-Based Drug Design

  2007cites this paper
• DrugScoreRNAKnowledge-Based Scoring Function To Predict RNA-Ligand Interactions

  2007cites this paper
• Hybrid-genetic algorithms for flexible ligand docking

  2007cites this paper
• High throughput in-silico screening of large ligand databases for rational drug design

  2006cites this paper
• An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials

  2006cites this paper
• Development of quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship models based on novel geometrical chemical descriptors of the protein-ligand interfaces.

  2006cites this paper
• Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases)

  2005cites this paper
• General and targeted statistical potentials for protein–ligand interactions

  2005cites this paper
• A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.

  2005cites this paper
• The key role of atom types, reference states, and interaction cutoff radii in the knowledge‐based method: New variational approach

  2005cites this paper
• Structural basis for preferential binding of non‐ortho‐substituted polychlorinated biphenyls by the monoclonal antibody S2B1

  2005influential citation
• Knowledge based potentials : the reverse boltzmann methodology, virtual screening and molecular weight dependence

  2005cites this paper
• LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities.

  2005cites this paper
• a Priori Contact Preferences in Molecular Recognition

  2005cites this paper
• Novel knowledge-based potentials for ligand docking: variational approach to the old problem.

  2005cites this paper
• Protein–Ligand Interactions: Knowledge-Based Methods

  2005cites this paper
• An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes

  2004cites this paper
• Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

  2004cites this paper
• PLASS: Protein-ligand affinity statistical score – a knowledge-based force-field model of interaction derived from the PDB

  2004cites this paper
• Enzyme Binding Selectivity Prediction: alpha-Thrombin vs Trypsin Inhibition

  2004cites this paper
• The dependence of all-atom statistical potentials on structural training database.

  2004cites this paper