A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Science, Technology, & Human Values

• Publication date

  2011-07-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/0162243910366154
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy: Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance

  2011cited by this paper
• Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy: Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance

  2010cited by this paper
• Book Review: Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation

  2010cited by this paper
• Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy

  2009cited by this paper
• :The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited

  2009cited by this paper
• Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously

  2009cited by this paper
• “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”

  2008influential reference
• Interactive Technology Assessment in the Real World

  2008cited by this paper
• How Robust is “Socially Robust Knowledge”?

  2008cited by this paper
• :Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States

  2008influential reference
• Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions

  2007cited by this paper
• Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference

  2007cited by this paper
• TAKING EUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY SERIOUSLY Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission

  2007cited by this paper
• Expertise: from attribute to attribution and back again?

  2007cited by this paper
• Why Deliberative Democracy?

  2007cited by this paper
• Theory, Evidence, and the Tasks of Deliberation

  2007cited by this paper
• A Toolkit for Democratizing Science and Technology Policy: The Practical Mechanics of Organizing a Consensus Conference

  2007influential reference
• The Received Wisdom:: Opening Up Expert Advice

  2006cited by this paper
• Risk As Globalising "Democratic" Discourse? Framing Subjects And Citizens

  2006cited by this paper
• Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe

  2006cited by this paper
• Science and citizens : globalization and the challenge of engagement

  2006cited by this paper
• Deliberative Democracy and the Environment

  2005influential reference
• DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY

  2005cited by this paper
• Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society

  2005cited by this paper
• Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? T. M. Koontz, T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. W. Thomas. 2004. RFF Press, Washington, DC. 200 pp. $50 cloth, $23.95 paperback.

  2005cited by this paper
• Democratization of Expertise?: Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making

  2005cited by this paper
• ‘Let them eat cake’: GM foods and the democratic imagination

  2005cited by this paper
• Citizen deliberations on science and technology and their social environments: case study on the Japanese consensus conference on GM crops

  2005cited by this paper
• Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda

  2004cited by this paper
• Challenging the 'view from nowhere': citizen reflections on specialist expertise in a deliberative process.

  2004cited by this paper
• Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference

  2004cited by this paper
• See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream

  2004cited by this paper
• Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism

  2003cited by this paper
• The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach

  2003cited by this paper
• Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy

  2003influential reference
• ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: What does this mean, and why bother?

  2003cited by this paper
• Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty

  2003cited by this paper
• Deliberation, Legitimacy, and Multilateral Democracy

  2003cited by this paper
• Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge

  2003cited by this paper
• Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.

  2003cited by this paper
• The Promise(s) of Deliberative Democracy

  2002cited by this paper
• Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy

  2001influential reference
• Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy

  2001cited by this paper
• The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason.

  2001cited by this paper
• Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences

  2001influential reference
• Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy

  1999cited by this paper
• Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development

  1998cited by this paper
• Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy

  1996cited by this paper
• Democracy and difference : contesting the boundaries of the political

  1996influential reference
• Town meetings on technology

  1996cited by this paper
• Communication and the other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy

  1995cited by this paper
• Democracy and Disagreement

  1995cited by this paper
• Dealing With Difference: A Politics of Ideas Or A Politics of Presence?

  1994cited by this paper
• Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy

  1994cited by this paper
• Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics James N. Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. xii, 311

  1993cited by this paper
• Science and Engineering Indicators

  1993cited by this paper
• Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm.

  1992cited by this paper
• The good polity : normative analysis of the state

  1989cited by this paper

• Democratizing science, technology, and innovation — what do we mean?

  2026cites this paper
• Negotiating knowledge and action for sustainable rangeland management: Successes and failures of boundary work at the science-policy-society interface in Iceland.

  2025cites this paper
• Citizen participation and technology: lessons from the fields of deliberative democracy and science and technology studies

  2025cites this paper
• From Fake Perfects to Conversational Imperfects: Exploring Image-Generative AI as a Boundary Object for Participatory Design of Public Spaces

  2024cites this paper
• Between Open Deliberation and the Capturing of Public Opinion: Producing Opinions in Public Engagement

  2024cites this paper
• What is “Dialogue” in Public Engagement with Science and Technology? Bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy

  2024cites this paper
• Science and the nation-state: What China’s experience reveals about the role of policy in science

  2024cites this paper
• Questionable devices: Applying a large language model to deliberate carbon removal

  2024cites this paper
• Mapping pathways to responsible innovation: Configurations of digital economy, effectuation, and firm size in SMEs—A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

  2024cites this paper
• Normative Paradigms and Interdisciplinary Research

  2024cites this paper
• Rethinking Planetary Boundaries: Accounting for Ecological Limits

  2023cites this paper
• An experiential account of a large-scale interdisciplinary data analysis of public engagement

  2022cites this paper
• If deliberation is the answer, what is the question? Objectives and evaluation of public participation and engagement in science and technology

  2022cites this paper
• Participatory Science Communication Through Consensus Conferences: Legitimacy Evaluations of a German Consensus Conference on Genome Editing

  2022cites this paper
• Participatory Governance Practices at the Democracy-Knowledge-Nexus

  2022cites this paper
• Transformation of Markers of the Deliberative Democracy Theory in Modern Political Science

  2022cites this paper
• The Boundaries of Scientific Innovation in the EU Green Deal Context

  2022cites this paper
• Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI

  2021cites this paper
• Towards a meaningful innovation paradigm: conceptual framework and practice of leading world-class enterprise

  2021cites this paper
• Dealing with the epistemic-democratic tension in policy-making. Institutional design choices for multi-layered democratic innovations

  2021influential citation
• Commercialization and Space: Democracies Can Fly in Space

  2021cites this paper
• Boundary speak in sustainability studies: Computational reading of a transversal field

  2021cites this paper
• Methodology, Theory and Context

  2021cites this paper
• Analytical categories to describe deficit attributions in deep disagreements between citizens and experts

  2021cites this paper
• Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge

  2021cites this paper
• Designing Participatory Technology Assessments: A Reflexive Method for Advancing the Public Role in Science Policy Decision-making

  2021cites this paper
• Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission

  2021cites this paper
• Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment

  2020cites this paper
• Emancipation cannot be programmed: blind spots of algorithmic facilitation in online deliberation

  2020cites this paper
• The practice of responsible research and innovation in “climate engineering”

  2020cites this paper
• Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy

  2020cites this paper
• National policy councils for science, technology, and innovation: A scheme for structural definition and implementation

  2020cites this paper
• Introduction: How the Sociology of Science and Technology Addresses Science and Society Relations

  2020cites this paper
• Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation

  2019cites this paper
• Channelling sensitivity : the production of justification for shale gas development through the English planning system

  2019cites this paper
• Public Engagement on Climate and Health in Museums and Participatory Dialogues may Foster Behavior Change

  2019cites this paper
• Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation

  2019cites this paper
• Solar Geoengineering: Social Science, Legal, Ethical, and Economic Frameworks

  2019cites this paper
• Making sense of science for policy under conditions of complexity and uncertainty

  2019cites this paper
• Utility of science, technology and innovation governance for occupational discourses from the perspective of occupational therapy students

  2019cites this paper
• Democratising planetary boundaries: experts, social values and deliberative risk evaluation in Earth system governance

  2019cites this paper
• Panel-based exhibit using participatory design elements may motivate behavior change

  2019cites this paper
• Ability and authority?: Studies on the constructedness and expansion of expertise in the contemporary public sphere

  2019cites this paper
• Beyond consensus: perceptions of risk from petroleum developments in Lofoten, Vesterålen, and Senja, Norway

  2019cites this paper
• Democracy, disagreement, disruption: agonism and the environmental state

  2019cites this paper
• 'Lowering your standards'? : assessing the procedural legitimacy of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

  2019cites this paper
• New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics

  2018cites this paper
• Toward Legitimate Governance of Solar Geoengineering Research: A Role for Sub-State Actors

  2018cites this paper
• Co-producing Future Earth : ambiguity and experimentation in the governance of global environmental change research

  2018influential citation
• Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: a deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance

  2018cites this paper
• Pathways to deliberative capacity: the role of the IPCC

  2018cites this paper
• Practicing responsible research and innovation in a crowdsourcing project in Norway

  2018cites this paper
• The Expansion of Science Policy in the United States in Three Cases: rDNA Research, The Human Genome Project, and the National Nanotechnology Initiative

  2018cites this paper
• Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation

  2018cites this paper
• The Transnational Perspective of Political Participation: Linkages and Differences between Social Movement and Public Participation Studies

  2017cites this paper
• The role of public participation in environmental impact assessment in Ethiopia: Theory and practise

  2017influential citation
• Participation Beyond Consensus? Technology Assessments, Consensus Conferences and Democratic Modulation

  2017cites this paper
• Responsible innovation: its institutionalisation and a critique

  2017cites this paper
• Social Ecology as Critical, Transdisciplinary Science—Conceptualizing, Analyzing and Shaping Societal Relations to Nature

  2017cites this paper
• UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Questioning the normative core of RI

  2017cites this paper
• Participation Beyond Consensus? Technology Assessments, Consensus Conferences and Democratic Modulation

  2017cites this paper
• Critical Elitism: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Problem of Expertise

  2017cites this paper
• Questioning the Normative Core of RI: The Challenges Posed to Stakeholder Engagement in a Corporate Setting

  2017cites this paper
• Principles and Best Practices for Climate Change Adaptation

  2016cites this paper
• Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement

  2016cites this paper
• Investigating communication and participatory processes in decision making

  2016cites this paper
• Co-production and the politics of usable knowledge for climate adaptation in Tanzania

  2016cites this paper
• Consenting to Geoengineering

  2016cites this paper
• The Quest for Reproducibility Viewed in the Context of Innovation Societies

  2016cites this paper
• Re-working boundaries : values and legitimation at the climate science-policy interface

  2016cites this paper
• As relações entre ciência e política, especialização e democracia: a trajetória de um debate em aberto

  2016cites this paper
• Public engagement in Higher Education: state of the art

  2016cites this paper
• Framing and power in public deliberation with climate change: Critical reflections on the role of deliberative practitioners

  2016cites this paper
• Reflexively engaging with technologies of participation: constructive assessment for public participation methods

  2015cites this paper
• Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation

  2015cites this paper
• Does the engagement between science and society pose risks for intelligent scientific practice

  2015influential citation
• Revisiting "upstream public engagement" in nanotechnologies : from the perspective of the public sphere

  2015cites this paper
• Toward two narratives of knowledge

  2015cites this paper
• Democratizing Expertise and Environmental Governance: Different Approaches to the Politics of Science and their Relevance for Policy Analysis

  2015cites this paper
• DEMOCRATIZING BIOETHICS. ONLINE PARTICIPATION AND THE LIFE SCIENCES

  2015cites this paper
• The legitimacy of transnational private governance arrangements related to nanotechnologies: the case of international organization for standardization

  2015cites this paper
• Making it Personal: Diversity and Deliberation in Climate Adaptation Planning

  2015cites this paper
• Scientists as policy actors: a study of the language of biofuel research.

  2015cites this paper
• Bridging Promises and (Dis)Illusions: Deliberative Democracy in an Evolutionary Perspective

  2015cites this paper
• The Iraq War and the discursive construction of knowledge: claims of political threat, risk, cost, and benefit

  2015cites this paper
• CCS Acceptability: Social Site Characterization and Advancing Awareness at Prospective Storage Sites in Poland and Scotland

  2015cites this paper
• Consenting to Geoengineering

  2015cites this paper
• Why should we promote public engagement with science?

  2014cites this paper
• the driving factors behind participation intention ? Public participation processes related to nuclear research installations : What are

  2014cites this paper
• Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond

  2014cites this paper
• Sustainable development and institutional boundaries

  2014cites this paper
• Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change – some lessons from recent literature

  2014cites this paper
• Knowledge kills action – why principles should play a limited role in policy-making

  2014cites this paper
• Construction, Co‐production, and Beyond. Academic Disputes and Public Concerns in the Recent Debate on Nature and Society

  2014cites this paper
• A Transparency Turn in Global Environmental Governance

  2014cites this paper
• Transdisciplinary Environmental Science: Problem-oriented Projects and Strategic Research Programs

  2014cites this paper
• Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review

  2014cites this paper
• Integrative Scenario Development

  2014cites this paper
• Learning in, through, and about participatory technology assessment: the case of Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow's Society (NanoSoc)

  2014cites this paper
• Public participation processes related to nuclear research installations: What are the driving factors behind participation intention?

  2014cites this paper