SCIENCE@home

In vitro RHE skin sensitisation assays: Applicability to challenging substances.

A. Mehling,E. Adriaens,S. Casati,B. Hubesch,A. Irizar,M. Klarić,S. Letašiová,I. Manou,B. P. Müller,E. Roggen,E. van Vliet,D. Basketter

Published 2019 in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP

ABSTRACT

In the last 20 years, alternative approaches to the identification of skin sensitisation hazards have been at the forefront of the 3Rs and have helped refine the validation and acceptance processes. However, experience with the local lymph node assay showed that, post-validation, challenges still occurred, particularly when a wider diversity of chemical substances was addressed, a situation which will arise with validated in vitro alternatives. In the present work, a range of substances potentially challenging to assess in current nonanimal OECD test guidelines were evaluated in several of the emerging in vitro alternatives. Twelve such substances (of which just over half were known skin sensitisers) were assessed in 4 assays, all based on reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) models. For hazard identification, the overall predictive accuracy ranged around 70% for three assays, although for one (SensCeeTox), it fell below 50% when human data was used as the benchmark. In most cases, sensitivity was high, such that sensitisation was overpredicted. As the substances were challenging to assess in other nonanimal methods, the results indicate that the 3D RHE models may be a useful tool for assessing skin sensitisation potentials without needing to revert to animal use.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-22 of 22 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-18 of 18 citing papers · Page 1 of 1