Despite the oft touted benefits of having differences in how people think about a task, teams often are not able to capitalize on their heterogeneity. The problem, we demonstrate, is that representational gaps—fundamental incompatibilities in the way that team members conceptualize the problem and solution space—degrade the knowledge synthesis capabilities of teams. We show that rGaps degrade team processes and thus have a unique effect on performance above and beyond mere differences in cognition. In two laboratory studies, we find that representational gaps hurt verbal and nonverbal communication and increased relationship conflict. Relationship conflict, in turn, mediated the negative relationship between rGaps and performance. We discuss possible interventions when rGaps are present.
Beyond Diversity and Homogeneity: Conceptualizing Compatibility in Cognition
Shirley C. Wang,M. A. Cronin,Elizabeth A. Mannix
Published 2024 in Group & Organization Management
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2024
- Venue
Group & Organization Management
- Publication date
2024-03-29
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-82 of 82 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-3 of 3 citing papers · Page 1 of 1