Evidence-informed person-centred health care (part II): are 'cognitive biases plus' underlying the EBM paradigm responsible for undermining the quality of evidence?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice

• Publication date

  2014-12-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/jep.12291PMID 25494630
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• How good is "evidence" from clinical studies of drug effects and why might such evidence fail in the prediction of the clinical utility of drugs?

  2015cited by this paper
• StaR Child Health: developing evidence-based guidance for the design, conduct and reporting of paediatric trials

  2014cited by this paper
• Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?

  2014cited by this paper
• Complementing the randomized controlled trial evidence base. Evolution not revolution.

  2014cited by this paper
• Considering intellectual, in addition to financial, conflicts of interest proved important in a clinical practice guideline: a descriptive study.

  2014cited by this paper
• The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index.

  2014cited by this paper
• Modern healthcare: a technical giant, yet an ethical child?

  2014cited by this paper
• How evidence-based medicine is failing due to biased trials and selective publication.

  2014cited by this paper
• A Primer on Effectiveness and Efficacy Trials

  2014cited by this paper
• Evidence-informed person-centred health care (part II): are 'cognitive biases plus' underlying the EBM paradigm responsible for undermining the quality of evidence?

  2014cited by this paper
• Evidence-informed person-centered healthcare part I: do 'cognitive biases plus' at organizational levels influence quality of evidence?

  2014cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine--an oral history.

  2014cited by this paper
• The Evidence-based Medicine Paradigm: Where are We 20 Years Later? Part 1

  2013cited by this paper
• Too Much Medicine: from evidence to action

  2013cited by this paper
• The Evidence-based Medicine Paradigm: Where are We 20 Years Later? Part 2

  2013cited by this paper
• Evidence-Based Medicine 20 Years On: A View from the Inside

  2013cited by this paper
• Where next for evidence based healthcare?

  2013cited by this paper
• Study design and "evidence" in patient-oriented research.

  2013cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine - are we boiling the frog?

  2013cited by this paper
• The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine.

  2012cited by this paper
• Why do we always end up here? Evidence-based medicine's conceptual cul-de-sacs and some off-road alternative routes.

  2012cited by this paper
• Randomised trials in surgery: the burden of evidence.

  2012cited by this paper
• Biases in the Evaluation of Psychiatric Clinical Evidence

  2012cited by this paper
• Scientific inbreeding and same-team replication: type D personality as an example.

  2012cited by this paper
• Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals

  2012cited by this paper
• Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.

  2011cited by this paper
• Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?

  2011cited by this paper
• Methodology for the Systematic Reviews on an Evidence-Based Approach for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain

  2011cited by this paper
• Evidence-based practice: triumph of style over substance?

  2011cited by this paper
• The evidence-based medicine model of clinical practice: scientific teaching or belief-based preaching?

  2011cited by this paper
• Models in the balance: evidence-based medicine versus evidence-informed individualized care.

  2011cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine and philosophy of science.

  2010cited by this paper
• A Critical Appraisal of Standard Guidelines for Grading Levels of Evidence

  2010cited by this paper
• Hubris syndrome: an acquired personality disorder? A study of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers over the last 100 years.

  2009cited by this paper
• Against pragmatism: on efficacy, effectiveness and the real world

  2009cited by this paper
• Iconoclast or Creed?: Objectivism, Pragmatism, and the Hierarchy of Evidence

  2009cited by this paper
• Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine.

  2009cited by this paper
• A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality.

  2009cited by this paper
• Why good leaders make bad decisions.

  2009cited by this paper
• The search for substance: a quest for the identity-conditions of evidence-based medicine and some comments on Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H. & Ashcroft, R. E. (2009) Cancer Control, 16, 158-168.

  2009cited by this paper
• On a medicine of the whole person: away from scientistic reductionism and towards the embrace of the complex in clinical practice.

  2009cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: requiescat in pace? A commentary on Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H. & Ashcroft, R. E. (2009) Cancer Control, 16, 158-168.

  2009cited by this paper
• The Nature of Evidence in Evidence-Based Medicine: Guest Editors’ Introduction

  2009cited by this paper
• Valuing Evidence: Bias and the Evidence Hierarchy of Evidence-Based Medicine

  2009cited by this paper
• De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions.

  2008cited by this paper
• Counterpoint: evidence-based medicine lacks a sound scientific base.

  2008cited by this paper
• Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system.

  2008cited by this paper
• Progress in evidence-based medicine.

  2008cited by this paper
• Misunderstandings, misperceptions, and mistakes

  2007cited by this paper
• Randomized controlled trials

  2007cited by this paper
• Author's response: a survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature.

  2007cited by this paper
• Can academic and clinical journals be in financial conflict of interest situations? The case of evidence-based incorporated.

  2006cited by this paper
• Taking stock of evidence-based medicine: opportunities for its continuing evolution.

  2006cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it is not.

  2006cited by this paper
• Evidence based medicine.

  2006cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: fifteen years later. Golem the good, the bad, and the ugly in need of a review?

  2006cited by this paper
• Continuing the evidence-based health care debate in 2006. The progress and price of EBM.

  2006cited by this paper
• Response to Carter et al.: A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature.

  2006cited by this paper
• A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature.

  2006cited by this paper
• Reductionist inference-based medicine, i.e. EBM.

  2006cited by this paper
• Reductionist inference‐based medicine, i.e. EBM

  2006cited by this paper
• External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking.

  2006cited by this paper
• Assessing the quality of research

  2004cited by this paper
• Observationalversus experimental studies: What’s the evidence for a hierarchy?

  2004cited by this paper
• Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports

  2004cited by this paper
• Hierarchy of Evidence: From Case Reports to Randomized Controlled Trials

  2003cited by this paper
• Are all evidence-based practices alike? Problems in the ranking of evidence.

  2003cited by this paper
• ‘Better than numbers…’ a gentle critique of evidence‐based medicine

  2003cited by this paper
• Education and debate

  2003cited by this paper
• A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations.

  2003cited by this paper
• Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on “diagnostic tests”

  2002cited by this paper
• The case against ‘the evidence’: A different perspective on evidence-based medicine

  2002cited by this paper
• Evidence based medicine: the median is not the message.

  2001cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms.

  2000cited by this paper
• A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials

  2000cited by this paper
• A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.

  2000cited by this paper
• Examining the assumptions of evidence-based medicine.

  1999cited by this paper
• Labour's health policy is having paradoxical effect in Iberian countries

  1999cited by this paper
• Beyond conflict of interest. Non-financial conflicts of interest are more serious than financial conflicts.

  1999cited by this paper
• The philosophical limits of evidence‐based medicine

  1998cited by this paper
• The rise and fall of EBM.

  1998cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: a new paradigm or the Emperor's new clothes?

  1998cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine.

  1998cited by this paper
• The hidden traps in decision making.

  1998cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: a new paradigm or the Emperor's new clothes?

  1998cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: why all the fuss? This is why.

  1997cited by this paper
• An ethical code for everybody in health care

  1997cited by this paper
• Problems in the "evidence" of "evidence-based medicine".

  1997cited by this paper
• The protagonists of 'evidence-based medicine': arrogant, seductive and controversial.

  1996cited by this paper
• Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't

  1996cited by this paper
• "Evidence-based medicine": terminologic lapse or terminologic arrogance?

  1996cited by this paper
• The dark side of evidence-based medicine.

  1996cited by this paper
• Looking for the Evidence in Medicine

  1996cited by this paper
• Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine.

  1995cited by this paper
• The rhetoric of research

  1995cited by this paper
• Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving

  1995cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine

  1995cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine and Kurt Godel.

  1995cited by this paper
• Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents.

  1992cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine.

  1992cited by this paper

• PRAgmatic Clinical Trial Design of Integrative MediCinE (PRACTICE): A Focus Group Series and Systematic Review on Trials of Diabetes and Kidney Disease

  2021cites this paper
• Randomized controlled trials in surgery for inguinal hernias

  2021influential citation
• Does evidence based medicine adversely affect clinical judgment?

  2018cites this paper
• Developing a minimum dataset for nursing team leader handover in the intensive care unit: a prospective interventional study

  2018cites this paper
• Gating the holes in the Swiss cheese (part I): Expanding professor Reason's model for patient safety

  2017influential citation
• The Nexus Between Patient-Centered Care and Complementary Medicine: Allies in the Era of Chronic Disease?

  2017cites this paper
• ‘Cognitive biases plus’: covert subverters of healthcare evidence

  2015cites this paper
• A 'reluctant' critical review: 'Manual for evidence-based clinical practice (2015)'.

  2015influential citation
• Evidence-informed person-centred health care (part II): are 'cognitive biases plus' underlying the EBM paradigm responsible for undermining the quality of evidence?

  2014cites this paper