Abstract Recent studies have provided evidence in favour of adopting early warning systems as a means of identifying at-risk students. Our study examines eight prediction methods, and investigates the optimal time in a course to apply such a system. We present findings from a statistics university course which has weekly continuous assessment and a large proportion of resources on the Learning Management System Blackboard. We identify weeks 5–6 (half way through the semester) as an optimal time to implement an early warning system, as it allows time for the students to make changes to their study patterns while retaining reasonable prediction accuracy. Using detailed variables, clustering and our final prediction method of BART (Bayesian Additive Regressive Trees) we can predict students' final mark by week 6 based on mean absolute error to 6.5 percentage points. We provide our R code for implementation of the prediction methods used in a GitHub repository 1 . Abbreviations: Bayesian Additive Regressive Trees (BART); Random Forests (RF); Principal Components Regression (PCR); Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (Splines); K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN); Neural Networks (NN) and; Support Vector Machine (SVM)
Contrasting prediction methods for early warning systems at undergraduate level
E. Howard,M. Meehan,A. Parnell
Published 2016 in Internet and Higher Education
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2016
- Venue
Internet and Higher Education
- Publication date
2016-12-17
- Fields of study
Mathematics, Computer Science, Education
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-30 of 30 references · Page 1 of 1