Heuristics and Biases: Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2002

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808098.020
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.

  2009cited by this paper
• The Affection Effect in Insurance Decisions

  2006cited by this paper
• CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX. Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior

  2004cited by this paper
• Good Day Sunshine: Stock Returns and the Weather

  2003cited by this paper
• The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others

  2002cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence

  2002cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment

  2002cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?

  2002cited by this paper
• On the adequacy of prototype theory as a thmry of concepts

  2002cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability

  2002cited by this paper
• Overconfidence in Judgmental Forecasting

  2001cited by this paper
• Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: a matter of information structure and question form.

  2001cited by this paper
• Colors, Smiles, and Frowns: External Affective Cues can Directly Affect Responses to Persuasive Communications in a Mood-like Manner Without Affecting Mood

  2001cited by this paper
• The Joint Failure of Economic Theory and Legal Regulation

  2001cited by this paper
• Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans

  2001cited by this paper
• Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties

  2001cited by this paper
• Taking into Account the Strength of an Alternative Hypothesis

  2001cited by this paper
• Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors

  2001cited by this paper
• You don't know me, but I know you: the illusion of asymmetric insight.

  2001cited by this paper
• Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.

  2001cited by this paper
• Investing in Frankenfirms: Predicting Socially Unacceptable Risks

  2001cited by this paper
• Risk as feelings.

  2001cited by this paper
• Rationality and Analysts' Forecast Bias

  2001cited by this paper
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Risk‐Reduction Strategies for Consumer Chemical Products

  2001cited by this paper
• Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration

  2001cited by this paper
• The makings of the magical mind: The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking.

  2000cited by this paper
• The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits

  2000cited by this paper
• Evolution and the human mind: The evolution of knowledge

  2000cited by this paper
• Cognitive Biases and Organizational Correctives: Do Both Disease and Cure Depend on the Politics of the Beholder?

  2000cited by this paper
• Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension

  2000cited by this paper
• Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation?

  2000cited by this paper
• Imagery, Affect, and Financial Judgment

  2000cited by this paper
• Teen expectations for significant life events.

  2000cited by this paper
• Informed Consent for Eliciting Environmental Values

  2000cited by this paper
• Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: misperceptions of the endowment effect.

  2000cited by this paper
• Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.

  2000cited by this paper
• Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups.

  2000cited by this paper
• Judging Risk and Return of Financial Assets.

  2000cited by this paper
• The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice

  2000cited by this paper
• People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times.

  2000cited by this paper
• The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks.

  2000cited by this paper
• Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats

  2000cited by this paper
• Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.

  2000cited by this paper
• College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study

  2000cited by this paper
• Should observed overconfidence be dismissed as a statistical artifact? Critique of Erev, Wallsten, and Budescu (1994)

  2000cited by this paper
• The Illusory Transparency of Intention: Does June Understand What Mark Means Because He Means It?

  2000cited by this paper
• The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.

  2000cited by this paper
• Initial symptoms of nicotine dependence in adolescents

  2000cited by this paper
• The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight.

  2000cited by this paper
• Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference.

  2000cited by this paper
• Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility

  2000cited by this paper
• A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes

  2000cited by this paper
• The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill.

  1999cited by this paper
• Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.

  1999cited by this paper
• Theory-Driven Reasoning About Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics: Are We Prisoners of Our Preconceptions?

  1999cited by this paper
• Forming Judgments of Attitude Certainty, Intensity, and Importance: The Role of Subjective Experiences

  1999cited by this paper
• How We Know—and Sometimes Misjudge—What Others Know: Imputing One's Own Knowledge to Others

  1999cited by this paper
• Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.

  1999cited by this paper
• The Spotlight Effect and the Illusion of Transparency

  1999cited by this paper
• Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations

  1999cited by this paper
• Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues

  1999cited by this paper
• Chinese and English Speakers’ Linguistic Expression of Probability and Probabilistic Thinking

  1999cited by this paper
• Why (cancer) risk communication can be hard.

  1999cited by this paper
• Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle.

  1999cited by this paper
• From Thought to Action: Effects of Process-Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance

  1999cited by this paper
• Accounting for the effects of accountability.

  1999cited by this paper
• Focus, repacking, and the judgment of grouped hypotheses

  1999cited by this paper
• How to show that 9 > 221 : Collect judgments in a between-subjects design

  1999cited by this paper
• Nonlinear Decision Weights in Choice Under Uncertainty

  1999cited by this paper
• Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor

  1999cited by this paper
• Format dependence in subjective probability calibration

  1999cited by this paper
• New Evidence on Serial Correlation in Analyst Forecast Errors

  1999cited by this paper
• Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-Pencil versus Behavioral Measures

  1999cited by this paper
• Are Most People Happier than their Peers, or Are They Just Happy?

  1999cited by this paper
• A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.

  1999cited by this paper
• (Non)Complementary updating of belief in two hypotheses

  1999cited by this paper
• Psychophysical Numbing: When Lives Are Valued Less as the Lives at Risk Increase

  1999cited by this paper
• The "conjunction fallacy" revisited : How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors

  1999cited by this paper
• Goals as reference points.

  1999cited by this paper
• The Curse of Expertise: The Effects of Expertise and Debiasing Methods on Predictions of Novice Performance

  1999cited by this paper
• Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support.

  1999cited by this paper
• Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.

  1999cited by this paper
• Taking behavioralism seriously: some evidence of market manipulation.

  1999cited by this paper
• Decision Making by Experts: The GNAHM Effect

  1999cited by this paper
• Comparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring

  1999cited by this paper
• Beliefs Influence Information Processing Strategies: Declarative and Experiential Information in Risk Assessment

  1999cited by this paper
• On the Social Psychology of Agency Relationships: Lay Theories of Motivation Overemphasize Extrinsic Incentives.

  1999cited by this paper
• How are base-rates used, when they are used: a comparison of additive and Bayesian models of base-rate use

  1999cited by this paper
• Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.

  1999cited by this paper
• Why some are perceived as more confident and more insecure, more reckless and more cautious, more trusting and more suspicious, than others: Enriched and impoverished options in social judgment

  1999cited by this paper
• Does the Temporal Stability of Behavioral Intentions Moderate Intention-Behavior and Past Behavior-Future Behavior Relations?

  1999cited by this paper
• THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING

  1999cited by this paper
• Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.

  1999cited by this paper
• Optimism and Self-Mastery Predict More Rapid Disengagement from Unsolvable Tasks in the Presence of Alternatives

  1999cited by this paper
• Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.

  1999cited by this paper
• A Note on Superadditive Probability Judgment

  1999cited by this paper
• Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure?

  1999cited by this paper
• Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.

  1999cited by this paper
• Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?

  1999cited by this paper
• Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments.

  1999cited by this paper

• An Interactionist Approach to Cognitive Debiasing

  2020cites this paper
• Mental Frameworks: Psychological, Religious, Philosophical, and Political

  2020cites this paper
• My worst faults and misdeeds: Self-criticism and self-enhancement can co-exist*

  2017cites this paper
• When cognition turns vicious: Heuristics and biases in light of virtue epistemology

  2015cites this paper
• Overconfidence in Forecasts of Own Performance: An Experimental Study

  2009cites this paper
• An exploration of self-confidence and insight into marking accuracy among GCSE maths and physics markers

  2007cites this paper
• These Bizarre Fictions: Thought-experiments, our Psychology and our Selves

  2006cites this paper
• Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest

  2005cites this paper