Machine Translation Performance Prediction System: Optimal Prediction for Optimal Translation

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2022

• Venue

  SN Computer Science

• Publication date

  2022-05-19

• Fields of study

  Linguistics, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s42979-022-01183-0
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Statistical Learning Theory

  2021cited by this paper
• Machine Translation with parfda, Moses, kenlm, nplm, and PRO

  2019cited by this paper
• deepQuest: A Framework for Neural-based Quality Estimation

  2018cited by this paper
• RTM results for Predicting Translation Performance

  2018influential reference
• Predicting Translation Performance with Referential Translation Machines

  2017influential reference
• The UU Submission to the Machine Translation Quality Estimation Task

  2016cited by this paper
• Edinburgh Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT 16

  2016cited by this paper
• Predicting the Performance of Parsing with Referential Translation Machines

  2016cited by this paper
• ParFDA for Instance Selection for Statistical Machine Translation

  2016cited by this paper
• Pattern Recognition And Machine Learning

  2016cited by this paper
• YSDA Participation in the WMT’16 Quality Estimation Shared Task

  2016cited by this paper
• RTM at SemEval-2016 Task 1: Predicting Semantic Similarity with Referential Translation Machines and Related Statistics

  2016influential reference
• Character-based Neural Machine Translation

  2016influential reference
• Optimizing Instance Selection for Statistical Machine Translation with Feature Decay Algorithms

  2015cited by this paper
• QuEst for High Quality Machine Translation

  2015cited by this paper
• The Edinburgh/JHU Phrase-based Machine Translation Systems for WMT 2015

  2015cited by this paper
• Referential translation machines for predicting semantic similarity

  2015influential reference
• Multi-level Translation Quality Prediction with QuEst++

  2015cited by this paper
• Domain Adaptation for Machine Translation with Instance Selection

  2015cited by this paper
• chrF: character n-gram F-score for automatic MT evaluation

  2015cited by this paper
• Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines

  2014cited by this paper
• Adaptive HTER Estimation for Document-Specific MT Post-Editing

  2014cited by this paper
• Findings of the 2014 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation

  2014cited by this paper
• QuEst – Design, Implementation and Extensions of a Framework for Machine Translation Quality Estimation

  2013cited by this paper
• Towards Efficient Large-Scale Feature-Rich Statistical Machine Translation

  2013influential reference
• Predicting sentence translation quality using extrinsic and language independent features

  2013cited by this paper
• Quality estimation for Machine Translation output using linguistic analysis and decoding features

  2012cited by this paper
• A weighted voting framework for classifiers ensembles

  2012cited by this paper
• The Regression Model of Machine Translation

  2012influential reference
• Findings of the 2012 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation

  2012cited by this paper
• Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

  2011cited by this paper
• Issues in Stacked Generalization

  2011cited by this paper
• RegMT System for Machine Translation, System Combination, and Evaluation

  2011cited by this paper
• Findings of the 2011 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation

  2011cited by this paper
• Super Learner In Prediction

  2010influential reference
• TrustRank: Inducing Trust in Automatic Translations via Ranking

  2010cited by this paper
• Estimating the Sentence-Level Quality of Machine Translation Systems

  2009cited by this paper
• Context-Based Sentence Alignment in Parallel Corpora

  2008cited by this paper
• Automatic Prediction of Parser Accuracy

  2008influential reference
• Learning syntactic structure

  2007cited by this paper
• METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments

  2007cited by this paper
• Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation

  2007cited by this paper
• A Study of Translation Edit Rate with Targeted Human Annotation

  2006cited by this paper
• Extremely randomized trees

  2006cited by this paper
• Sentence-level MT evaluation without reference translations: beyond language modeling

  2005cited by this paper
• Asymptotics of cross-validated risk estimation in estimator selection and performance assessment

  2005cited by this paper
• Confidence Estimation for Machine Translation

  2004cited by this paper
• A tutorial on support vector regression

  2004influential reference
• Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation

  2002cited by this paper
• Asymptotically Optimal Choice of ε-Loss for Support Vector Machines

  1998cited by this paper
• Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods

  1997cited by this paper
• The Mathematics of Statistical Machine Translation: Parameter Estimation

  1993cited by this paper
• When Networks Disagree: Ensemble Methods for Hybrid Neural Networks

  1992cited by this paper

• Identifying Intensity of the Structure and Content in Tweets and the Discriminative Power of Attributes in Context with Referential Translation Machines

  2024cites this paper
• Predicting Word Similarity in Context with Referential Translation Machines

  2024cites this paper
• A hybrid approach of Poisson distribution LDA with deep Siamese Bi-LSTM and GRU model for semantic similarity prediction for text data

  2023cites this paper